Aller au contenu

Photo

Obsidian should develop DA3


327 réponses à ce sujet

#201
Guest_simfamUP_*

Guest_simfamUP_*
  • Guests

mrcrusty wrote...

Save game bug has long been fixed I believe. I never got it, so meh. But I think that was an issue corrected months ago.


Nope still an issue. It's happen to a lot of players. Your just lucky ^_^

#202
Romantiq

Romantiq
  • Members
  • 1 784 messages

simfamSP wrote...

-Semper- wrote...

simfamSP wrote...

Such as the save game crash bug. I couldn't proceed anywhere because everytime the game saved. Weather auto, quick or manual - it just crashed.


pls don't blame obsidian because of your crappy pc. that's not their fault :P


You know what pisses me of. Is that someone is in such denial that they lead to insults? My PC has managed to run the newest games this year and it's almost 5 years old and the XP version.

Once again. I enjoy FO:NV it's a great game, but I am not blind to any flaws. Though those flaws to not hinder my enjoyment because I tend to ignore them. Like DA2. I enjoy it a lot. I really do. But I'm the first one to admit that it was a flop.


Try CASM (http://www.newvegasn...le.php?id=36730)
Go to options in New Vegas and disable saves on rest, wait, autosaves etc.

I had this crap happening to me in Fallout 3 as well but CASM fixes it in new vegas.

#203
Biodrone9001

Biodrone9001
  • Members
  • 9 messages
You don't have much faith in our overlords. They make the best games.

#204
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*

Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
  • Guests

Biodrone9001 wrote...

You don't have much faith in our overlords. They make the best games.


I really hope that was a form of sarcasm. If not, then I fear for you man...

Anyways, I half expected this thread to be locked when I got up today simply because there are two main camps when it comes to Obsidian. The people who hate their work regardless of Obsidian's strengths and those who love Obsidian despite their weaknesses. And when you have completely polar-opposite camps involved, discussion tends to get heated quickly.

All companies have strengths and weaknesses, this applies to video-game studios as well. But so far in this thread all I can really see is a bunch of biased conjectures along with blind hating. And much of the blind hating is uninformed or based on half-truths.

The fact of the matter is that Gaider, as talented as he is, cannot compare to the writers of Obsidian and Mike Laidlaw is not even close to half as good a lead developer as the most unqualified employee at Obsidian. That includes their janitors.

Modifié par XxTaLoNxX, 03 juin 2011 - 03:00 .


#205
Guest_simfamUP_*

Guest_simfamUP_*
  • Guests

XxTaLoNxX wrote...

Biodrone9001 wrote...

You don't have much faith in our overlords. They make the best games.


I really hope that was a form of sarcasm. If not, then I fear for you man...

Anyways, I half expected this thread to be locked when I got up today simply because there are two main camps when it comes to Obsidian. The people who hate their work regardless of Obsidian's strengths and those who love Obsidian despite their weaknesses. And when you have completely polar-opposite camps involved, discussion tends to get heated quickly.

All companies have strengths and weaknesses, this applies to video-game studios as well. But so far in this thread all I can really see is a bunch of biased conjectures along with blind hating. And much of the blind hating is uninformed or based on half-truths.

The fact of the matter is that Gaider, as talented as he is, cannot compare to the writers of Obsidian and Mike Laidlaw is not even close to half as good a lead developer as the most unqualified employee at Obsidian. That includes their janitors.


Right until then I was nodding in agreement. RIGHT UNTIL THEN!

You made a fair and honest post about the two sides of an obsidian discussion, then you go and make a complete hypocrite out of yourself.

#206
Nepenthe87

Nepenthe87
  • Members
  • 66 messages

-Semper- wrote...

Nepenthe87 wrote...

How could Obsidian have been thinking of a story and other design options in 2008 a year before they were contacted by Bethsoft?


because once upon a time black isle developed the real deal (fallout 3 aka van buren) which was later canceled. they kept the design documents as intellectual property and used them as inspiration for new vegas. if you browse through them you will notice lots of similarities ;)

anyways the 18month development time bio've gotten is more than enough for such a big team to drop an aaa title. their whole schedule was a mess. add all the bad design decisions they made and you know why da2 is... a dissappointment.


I know the history behind the fallout series. and setting =/= the story and characters. yeah they had all the stuff from Va buren but they said themselves they tried t otake as little from Van Buren as possible. Hell the only real thing in the game that was influenced by VB was caesars legion. the rest is completely different (to the point of even completely different wastelands).

So yeah they probably had a lot of the stuff from the Van buren days but that doesnt mean they were crafting the New vegas plot from that before they were contacted to make the game.

the way I see it is Bethsoft came to them about a new fallout game. They gathered up all their stuff from back in the old days and then decided to craft a completely new game. I dont think they had the foresight to start making a game before the ywere contacted to make it. even if it was their baby at one point.

Modifié par Nepenthe87, 03 juin 2011 - 03:38 .


#207
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*

Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
  • Guests

simfamSP wrote...

XxTaLoNxX wrote...

The fact of the matter is that Gaider, as talented as he is, cannot compare to the writers of Obsidian and Mike Laidlaw is not even close to half as good a lead developer as the most unqualified employee at Obsidian. That includes their janitors.


Right until then I was nodding in agreement. RIGHT UNTIL THEN!

You made a fair and honest post about the two sides of an obsidian discussion, then you go and make a complete hypocrite out of yourself.


Yes and no.

My opinion of David Gaider's abilities is what I would call an "isolated opinion" meaning that while other's may share that opinion it is probably not the general concensus. However my opinion of Mike Laidlaw is what I like to call "general concensus" meaning that well over half of the people who have an opinion of him tend to have a negative impression.

So am I a hypocrite? Yes. Because like all other human beings I have an opinion, and thus I am fallible. The same is true for you, I'm sure at some point in your life if I was around I could make the same accusation. However there is a point in my post. Perhaps I should have illustrated it better.

Based on the quality of Dragon Age 2 verse the quality of Obsidians past three games, I have reached the opinion that Obsidian's team is better qualified to make Dragon Age 3 due to the underwhelming qualifications of the current team BioWare/EA has assigned to the Dragon Age franchise. To dispute this would be to ignore the overwhelmingly negative response to DA2 as well as the continued success of the Fallout franchise, dispite personal opinions of the game, which have no bearing on the discussion... you know since it has outsold DA2 and been moderately better received AND a-helluva-lot more support for the game has been given compared to DA2.

6 patches (2 within 2 months) for F:NV vs. 3 patches (1 in month one, 1 in month 3, 1 in month 4) for DA2
*2 full DLCs (4 confirmed DLC/expansions) for F:NV vs. **Item Packs for DA2

sorry but according to Obsidian's track record for their latest game... I prefer an underwhelming launch with excellent post launch support vs. a decent launch and horrible "cash-grabbing and obviously failing" support.

Hypocrite? Sure, I'm fine with that.

* I would like to add that I LOVE knowing what I can expect from a companies DLC plans
VS.
** Being completely in the dark and only able to assume based on DA and ME2 that I can expect b.s. Item Packs and lackluster DLC... maybe, since we are completely in the dark about the DLC plans.

Modifié par XxTaLoNxX, 03 juin 2011 - 03:44 .


#208
Raygereio

Raygereio
  • Members
  • 913 messages

simfamSP wrote...
You made a fair and honest post about the two sides of an obsidian discussion, then you go and make a complete hypocrite out of yourself.

You know? I'm actually rather amazed at the fact that thread has remained so civil. Even personal attacks haven't really gone beyond the above sillyness. This isn't the forum filled with vitrol I used to know! What happened?

Anyway; do look up the meaning of the word hypocrite. In this case XxTaLoNxX would be an hypocrite if he was a member of the David Gaider fanclub, while simultaneously harping on the man, or something like that. This message was brought to you by association dedicated to the proper use of words

Honestly though: some people might think ME2 has a masterfully written story, I look at those people with a slack jawed, stunned expression of disbelieve. But hey, I can't argue they're wrong as that's their opinion. They're having fun with that story, so more power to them.
Likewise I have nothing but pity for the people that think Alpha Protocol is anything but a beautiful gem as that means they won't experience what I think of as a good game. I think it's sad for those individuals, but that's their loss.
What I'm trying to say is that this thread doesn't have any point to it. Everyone has their opinions of what is and isn't a good gamestudio and anyone that thinks his or her opinion is some kind of objective, unassailable truth deserve all the scorn and mockery they'll get.

Modifié par Raygereio, 03 juin 2011 - 04:42 .


#209
Eternal Phoenix

Eternal Phoenix
  • Members
  • 8 471 messages
Obsidian suck. There are game killing bugs in all of their games.

#210
Bejos_

Bejos_
  • Members
  • 643 messages

XxTaLoNxX wrote...

... the Fallout franchise ... has outsold DA2 and been moderately better received ...


These two points don't have any bearing on the rest of your post. You could interpret these two statements in a variety of ways. Fallout is more easy to market to FPS players than DA2 is; because FPS players are by far the biggest subset of gamers, it's reasonable to expect that Fallout would sell better than does DA2. Also, a lot of FPS players aren't expecting the same level of story or world that RPG fans do, so a lot of those "receptions" may well have been overly positive simply because they (FPS gamers) have nothing else with which to compare Fallout.
As gaming reviews and reception, I think it's been established fairly well over the past decade or two, are a shameful way to measure quality, and because DA2 is not an FPS, you really can't factor them into whether Bethesda would benefit DA3.

Modifié par Bejos_, 03 juin 2011 - 06:03 .


#211
Nashiktal

Nashiktal
  • Members
  • 5 584 messages
I love obsidian and their work.


But I do not want them making Dragon Age 3.

#212
Kalmarath

Kalmarath
  • Members
  • 7 messages
There are people in Obsidian who did Planescape: Torment and Fallout (1 and 2) no? Those are legendary.

I've only played Neverwinter Nights 2 and its expansion that are from Obsidian and I thought that they're better than the first.

Neverwinter Nights was quite a let down, especially after making a game like Baldur's Gate 2. But it got better in the expansions. And I thought that Obsidian did great with the sequel.

#213
Porenferser

Porenferser
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages
No thanks.

Also, what's the great deal about Obsidian writers?
I personally found the Story of KotoR 2 pretty much senseless.

#214
lyleoffmyspace

lyleoffmyspace
  • Members
  • 499 messages
The gameplay in KoTOR2 was better than in the first game. It's really not a bad game considering how long they had to work on it.

Chris Avellone's writing would be well suited to the world of Thedas too. DA is supposed to be gritty, dark, low fantasy isn't it? And that's what Chris does pretty well.

Modifié par lyleoffmyspace, 03 juin 2011 - 08:07 .


#215
ArcanistLibram

ArcanistLibram
  • Members
  • 1 036 messages
No.

#216
Brahox

Brahox
  • Members
  • 146 messages
I like Obsidain but I don't think they should have anything to do with DA3.. Bioware just needs to go back to doing what it did best.

#217
JamesMoriarty123

JamesMoriarty123
  • Members
  • 898 messages
They really shouldn't. As bad as DA2 is, Bioware's general quality is about 1000% better than Obsidian.

But then again, Alpha Protocol was actually better than DA2...and that's saying a lot.

Modifié par JamesMoriarty123, 03 juin 2011 - 08:38 .


#218
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*

Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
  • Guests

Porenferser wrote...

No thanks.

Also, what's the great deal about Obsidian writers?
I personally found the Story of KotoR 2 pretty much senseless.


I've seen this argument made quite often and this time I am glad it was made in the form of a question. See I can answer this instead of throwing out random information in an attempt at getting people who don't fully understand that situation.... to understand that situation.

See LucasArts pressured Obsidian into a rushed product by cutting the pre-established development time by 4 months or so, (I'm not sure if the fully accurate timeframe was ever released to public) but from the articles I read a long time ago about KoTOR2 that was the gist of the issues Obsidian faced.

Again, they were rushed. And in all seriousness we know what happens when you rush RPG development.

#219
jack_f

jack_f
  • Members
  • 73 messages
You can criticize Obsidian games for being unfinished or buggy, but one thing nobody can deny: their writing is miles above Bioware's - that's a fact.

#220
Guest_Guest12345_*

Guest_Guest12345_*
  • Guests
I heart Obsidian, but I don't think Bioware should license out any of their IPs.

#221
Atakuma

Atakuma
  • Members
  • 5 609 messages

jack_f wrote...

You can criticize Obsidian games for being unfinished or buggy, but one thing nobody can deny: their writing is miles above Bioware's - that's a fact.

That is nowhere near being a fact.

#222
-Semper-

-Semper-
  • Members
  • 2 259 messages

simfamSP wrote...

My PC has managed to run the newest games this year and it's almost 5 years old and the XP version.


you tried to format your hdd, install an os with newest drivers (unequipping all additional hardware not needed for running the game) and then only steam and new vegas, patched up to date and without mods? btw i've searched the interwebs and there is nowhere a nerdrage because of constant ctds while saving.

there are ctds, but they are minor and absolutely not restricted to saving. the fault lies within your hardware and you can't blame obsidian for this.

#223
A Crusty Knight Of Colour

A Crusty Knight Of Colour
  • Members
  • 7 472 messages

Atakuma wrote...

jack_f wrote...

You can criticize Obsidian games for being unfinished or buggy, but one thing nobody can deny: their writing is miles above Bioware's - that's a fact.

That is nowhere near being a fact.


I don't know about fact, but in all honesty, Chris Avellone & George Zeits > Bioware.

#224
hoorayforicecream

hoorayforicecream
  • Members
  • 3 420 messages

jack_f wrote...

You can criticize Obsidian games for being unfinished or buggy, but one thing nobody can deny: their writing is miles above Bioware's - that's a fact.


You might want to visit this link.

#225
-Semper-

-Semper-
  • Members
  • 2 259 messages

mrcrusty wrote...

I don't know about fact, but in all honesty, Chris Avellone & George Zeits > Bioware.


pls don't miss the jack of all trades sawyer.