506 réponses à ce sujet

[Mr.House]

jlb524 wrote...

Not everyone is bi....

...and this game is chock full of heterosexuality at every turn...really.

THAT TRAN ELF TURNED ME GAY!!!!

Wait I was already bi, ah crap.

[Blitzkrieg0811]

[spam image removed by moderator]

For the record, I'm inclined to agree with OP.

Warning: Images used as emotes or as commentary are considered as spam and will be dealt with as per the Site Rules

EDIT: I got backtraced by the cyberpolice D:>

Modifié par Blitzkrieg0811, 04 juin 2011 - 03:13 .

[KnightofPhoenix]

Zjarcal wrote...

I doubt Anders would've changed his stance on the mage/templar debacle due to his sexuality.

Freud would probably disagree with that.

And interpret that huge straight red beam in the sky as an illustration of him fantasizing over phalus ejaculating.
And would probably look at the tension between Justice and Anders as S&M in nature.

[thesilverlinedviking]

I though we would've broken this stick by now...

[syllogi]

neppakyo wrote...

San Fransico? *ducks and runs*

Nah, NYC for high school and the deep south for college.  

And I'm really the kind of person who doesn't care to hang around with people I have nothing in common with, so I wouldn't only choose friends based on sexual preference...which I believe has very little to do with your personality.  It was mostly a coincidence, or there are more LGBT nerds out there than you'd think.

[Zjarcal]

jlb524 wrote...

Not everyone is bi....

Indeed.

The four people who are willing to romance Hawke are bi. The rest, its all mixed.

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Zjarcal wrote...

I doubt Anders would've changed his stance on the mage/templar debacle due to his sexuality.

Freud would probably disagree with that. 

And interpret that huge straight red beam in the sky as an illustration of him fantasizing over phalus ejaculating.
And would probably look at the tension between Justice and Anders as S&M in nature. 


[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/devil.png[/smilie]

When I first read the Freud comment I thought we were about to have a quick back and forth discussion... and then you killed me with the Chantry ejaculation comment! :lol:

Modifié par Zjarcal, 04 juin 2011 - 03:03 .

[oldmansavage]

This thread is gayer than anders.

End of line.

[neppakyo]

TeenZombie wrote...

neppakyo wrote...

San Fransico? *ducks and runs*

Nah, NYC for high school and the deep south for college.  

And I'm really the kind of person who doesn't care to hang around with people I have nothing in common with, so I wouldn't only choose friends based on sexual preference...which I believe has very little to do with your personality.  It was mostly a coincidence, or there are more LGBT nerds out there than you'd think.

Oh I know, just dropped SF as that city is considered the mecca of gayness (not said in a mean way)

Girls who make out with girls, then discuss nerdy subjects are fun people.

[Mr.House]

oldmansavage wrote...

This thread is gayer than anders.

End of line.

*touches you*

[Monica83]

mmmmh for me all companion bisexual means ruins story..it just don't have any coherence... i have nothing aganist bi people cause im bisexual but i find a group where all are bisexual something laughtable... after sayd this...

*kiss neppakyo*

[Zjarcal]

Monica83 wrote...

mmmmh for me all companion bisexual means ruins story..it just don't have any coherence... i have nothing aganist bi people cause im bisexual but i find a group where all are bisexual something laughtable... after sayd this...

Four of the companions are bisexual. Is it really that hard to grasp that it's not ALL of them?

[TheBlackBaron]

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Zjarcal wrote...

I doubt Anders would've changed his stance on the mage/templar debacle due to his sexuality.

Freud would probably disagree with that.

And interpret that huge straight red beam in the sky as an illustration of him fantasizing over phalus ejaculating.
And would probably look at the tension between Justice and Anders as S&M in nature.

Goddamnit KoP. I'm never getting that image out of my head.

Zjarcal wrote...

Monica83 wrote...

mmmmh for
me all companion bisexual means ruins story..it just don't have any
coherence... i have nothing aganist bi people cause im bisexual but i
find a group where all are bisexual something laughtable... after sayd
this...

Four of the companions are bisexual. Is it really that hard to grasp that it's not ALL of them?

As if anybody cares about the companions you can't romance.

Modifié par TheBlackBaron, 04 juin 2011 - 03:13 .

[Monica83]

Zjarcal wrote...

Monica83 wrote...

mmmmh for me all companion bisexual means ruins story..it just don't have any coherence... i have nothing aganist bi people cause im bisexual but i find a group where all are bisexual something laughtable... after sayd this...

Four of the companions are bisexual. Is it really that hard to grasp that it's not ALL of them?

consider one of them is your brother/sister and the other is a Dwarf... lol i don't know if sebastian is... anyways...mhh the dog?

All romanceable character are bisexual

[Robobot]

Zjarcal wrote...

Monica83 wrote...

mmmmh for me all companion bisexual means ruins story..it just don't have any coherence... i have nothing aganist bi people cause im bisexual but i find a group where all are bisexual something laughtable... after sayd this...

Four of the companions are bisexual. Is it really that hard to grasp that it's not ALL of them?

[How about no to spam images used as emotes/commentary?]

Modifié par Selene Moonsong, 04 juin 2011 - 03:23 .

[Ryzaki]

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Zjarcal wrote...

I doubt Anders would've changed his stance on the mage/templar debacle due to his sexuality.

Freud would probably disagree with that.

And interpret that huge straight red beam in the sky as an illustration of him fantasizing over phalus ejaculating.
And would probably look at the tension between Justice and Anders as S&M in nature.

 

 

That...that explains so much. 

[Mr.House]

Monica83 wrote...

Zjarcal wrote...

Monica83 wrote...

mmmmh for me all companion bisexual means ruins story..it just don't have any coherence... i have nothing aganist bi people cause im bisexual but i find a group where all are bisexual something laughtable... after sayd this...

Four of the companions are bisexual. Is it really that hard to grasp that it's not ALL of them?

consider one of them is your brother/sister and the other is a Dwarf... lol i don't know if sebastian is... anyways...mhh the dog?

All romanceable character are bisexual

Seb is not bi, Aveline is not bi, Varric is not bi, Carver is not bi. You have failed, you must find another way.

Modifié par Mr.House, 04 juin 2011 - 03:14 .

[Zjarcal]

TheBlackBaron wrote...

As if anybody cares about the companions you can't romance.

And that would not be the game's problem if people think like that.

[jlb524]

I don't care about the potentially romanceable characters I don't romance.

[Ryzaki]

Mr.House wrote...

Monica83 wrote...

Zjarcal wrote...

Monica83 wrote...

mmmmh for me all companion bisexual means ruins story..it just don't have any coherence... i have nothing aganist bi people cause im bisexual but i find a group where all are bisexual something laughtable... after sayd this...

Four of the companions are bisexual. Is it really that hard to grasp that it's not ALL of them?

consider one of them is your brother/sister and the other is a Dwarf... lol i don't know if sebastian is... anyways...mhh the dog?

All romanceable character are bisexual

Seb is not bi, Aveline is not bi, Varric is not bi, Carver is not bi. You have failed, you must find another way.

 

Gee thanks now I have this echoing in myhead.  *hums along* 

[KnightofPhoenix]

On a serious note. I too prefer to have straight, bi and homosexual companions, instead of all of them being bi. I feel the former scenario adds more realism and ultimately more variety than the latter.

That said, as long as it's not written horribly, this is not something that is going to ruin my experience.

[Robobot]

Zjarcal wrote...

TheBlackBaron wrote...

As if anybody cares about the companions you can't romance.

And that would not be the game's problem if people think like that.

[spam image link removed by moderator]

Modifié par Robobot, 04 juin 2011 - 03:22 .

[Selene Moonsong]

 NPC's are not bisexual unless specifically designed as such. Otherwise, you should be considering NPCs as PC centric instead, meaning that their interest is in the PC, whether they are the same or opposite gender.; if you play a male character then it is possible for your character to have a male romantic interest as well, the same goes for women and possible female romantic interest.

If you have a bias against same gender romance, then you should not be showing such interest in a same gender character, it is easy enough to avoid in the game.

[Mr.House]

Ryzaki wrote...

Gee thanks now I have this echoing in myhead.  *hums along* 

I put Harby humor in there on purpose!

[Monica83]

Carver:Brother don't count
Varric:dwarf.Hetero
Avelin: is more a man than a woman but ok Hetero
Sebastian:DLC.i don't count it

Isabella:BI
Merryl:Bi
Fenris:BI

by the way to much BI and its still laughtable..in a storu prospective considering the character meet eachother only by random factor..

No need to be so rude is just a my opinion house.... Don't like this... You seems a kid that someone broke the toy

Criss chocker: Leave dragon age 2 alone right now!!! :___((