As was said before, your previous thread would not have been locked if it was about any LI instead of simply Tali. Hell, maybe just a squadmember. There would be no occasion where a specific squadmember from ME1 and ME2 would be sacrificed due to the fact that any of them could be dead due to ME2. The only characters who could have this situation brought to them is the VS, Anderson, Udina, Hackett, and Liara due to their current invulnerability in those games.
Would I sacrifice one of them to save hundreds? Depends on the importance of that person. Shadowbroker Liara, and counselor Udian/Anderson may be saved depending on their usefulness, but otherwise I'd sacrifice them.
now assuming the team at BioWare decided to herp their derp and inhale car exhaust for a few days and actually put in a situation where Tali is the ONLY ONE that could be sacrificed, even though in some peoples games she wont even be alive, it would still depend on her importance. If it seems impossible to gain the Quarians trust without her, or if the Quarian/Geth situation cannot be resolved without her then I'd save her because in the long run I'd probably be saving more people. (Following your updated question, with only hundreds of lives at stake instead of billions). If there was no such consequence I would probably sacrifice her.
The only problem I have here is that you insist on it being one specific character, when in reality it would probably be an important character who cannot die in one of the previous games, or a current squadmember.
Modifié par Spartanburger, 04 juin 2011 - 08:08 .