175 réponses à ce sujet

[Eveangaline]

I admit, for a full new game, I would like a new character.

However, I wouldn't mind an expansion pack for DA2, with Hawke.

[Rawgrim]

Brand new game. Cameos from previous games, maybe. Some returning companions.

[Rhayth]

I like the idea of a new main protagonist for DA3...but I think they're really sold on Hawke. I;m not against Hawke as I loved his VA...and i'd love to pick up DA3 and maybe having Bethany/Carver as a permanent companion for a full game.

I think DA2 falls into the "Empire Strikes Back" mytho of setting up the next one. I'm not gonna harp on DA2 problems my only real serious issue was the recycled dungeons. Plus maybe making more armors available...needless to say when I saw the new Grey Warden armors I was a little disappointed that I couldn't wear them...much like the Ceremonial Armor having a stat negative.

Either way I think a game with a focused path and making decisions rather then explaining motivations will do Hawke some good for his divided fanbase.

[renato30]

DA3 should continue where DA2 endend. It's not that I actually liked DA2 but Hawk's adventure changed much in all of Thedas wether we like it or not. The Templar/Mage war would be a great plot line and I would like to know where would said war lead Thedas to. Add in an invasion by the Qunari and all the ingridients are reunited for a grat story. But a new character is in order here. One where we should be able to choose both the race and social status. And then our character should be able to side with the Qunari, the templars or the mages changing the outcome of the war with our choice. As for Hawk and the Grey Warden I don't think they should appear. Maybe just mencioned. As for the companions we could use some from both games.

[Captain_Obvious]

I really don't know. I like Hawke, but I want to see the progression of the mages/templar conflict. If Hawke works with that, then use Hawke for DA3. If they can tie Origins and DA2 together in DA3, maybe that's the way to go. I don't really want to see the warden return solo.

[Kuriby]

Yep starting over would be the best idea, dragon age 2 left a bad scar in the series, anything related to origins will simply remind players about the horrifics of dragon age 2.

Start over, make a new game, they can use the same world, similar enemies, same lore, etc etc, just don't mention hawke

[furryrage59]

God i hope they fix it more in line to Origins than DA:2. That game was so terrible it made me feel like crying.

[SirOccam]

I really liked Hawke and his/her companions, so continuing from DA2 would be great.
That said, I also really liked my Warden, but I'm not sure how I feel about how giving the Wardens a voice (if they go that route, and I can't see them making another silent protagonist). I'd like to think I could accept it without too much fuss, but who knows. It would be weird.
That said, I also think a brand new character could be just as fun. It would be cool to have 3-4 games with new characters, then bring them all back for a big finale as squadmates (though the logistics of that would be pretty spectacularly complex).

[Shadowbanner]

Flayling wrote...

Personally I want to see Dragon Age 3 continue where Dragon Age Origins left off.  Then just pretend Dragon Age 2 never existed.

Ditto.

For me, it's like DA2 never existed; did not happen. I'm looking forward to DA3 as if it were DA2. Erm I take that back, as if it were DA3.

[Nohvarr]

I say new protagonist dealing with the Warden and Hawk's mess, and allow them to be bitter about it as well.

New Protagonist: "The Warden? Oh yeah brilliant fighter, but left a few lose ends that have become MY problem."

NP: "Hawk? A born survivor and a walking disaster area."

As far as returning characters: Varric, Cassandra, Isabela and Fenris from DA 2. Leliana, Dog, and Sten (or a suitable Quanari) from DA: O

The story is essentailly a new character (going back to Origins backstories) getting forced to solve the crap that's been dumped in his/her lap by the previous protagonists.

[SeliaRU]

In my opinion the story will be in Orlais, because Bodanh and "Enchantment" boy got there, so it settles it, all know how the creators love this pair.
About the protagonist, i'm not sure, it'll either be a new one, Hawke, or both Hawke and Warden ( If the last one will be true i think it will be separated in 3 or more acts, where in first u play as Hawke, second Warden, and the 3rd one you play both. ) For The Warden being main protagonist i doubt that, we can't forget that its like 13 or more years passed since we las saw him, so he won't be a best main character anymore. Origins story line has ended with archdemon, but Da2 didn't, so we definetly will have mage templar war.

[MegaBadExample]

I want Dragon Age 3 to be about, how Varric lied about the whole thing and there was no Hawke.

[ItsTheTruth]

MegaBadExample wrote...

I want Dragon Age 3 to be about, how Varric lied about the whole thing and there was no Hawke.

DA3 shouldn't be about that, but it is definitely something you should read in a codex somewhere.

[LostInReverie19]

I don't hate DA2 like a lot of people here do, but I think DA3 should be a new game. Obviously, it should still reference the events of the past two games, but I'd like a new hero/main character. I think that'd be best.

[ne0x]

i want my save games actually bring some changes and make my playstyle value,by this dragon age 2 failed 2 me so much ,nothing 2 change(and btw final choice between templar or mages changes nothing),and all mages are like kill them or they will stab u in back.So yeah i wanna play old hero from DA:O which rested enough now as king ,and is rdy to do epic adv,not some ****ty hawke noob,and btw how many times we have to kill flamet **** so she dies?
And btw bioware if u add mage or rogue into game balance it first,not that stupid things u couldn't win duel vs red devil as rogue or mage,just cause your dev's thinks everyone plays it as protection war:sick:,thus making dragon fight also unpleasant if u aren't war

Modifié par ne0x, 11 juin 2011 - 05:10 .

[house of flies]

DA:O

[AllThatJazz]

 I don't want to see a direct continuation of either game. My Warden's personal story is done and I'm assuming that Hawke's will be also, should I decide to purchase the (inevitable) dlc.

However, I much prefer the world state at the end of DA2 to that of Origins. End of Origins - there's peace and celebration and song, war is over, lalala etc. Which is all very nice, but conflict would have to be created from scratch again. The only really interesting scenario to me is if the Architect is still alive and the consequences of that. By the end of DA2, on the other hand, there's all-out war between mages and Templars/Chantry although some Templars are mage sympathisers, blood magic is seemingly on the rise but some mages despise it, the Qunari have been re-introduced as a mighty race and potential threat, there's tension between Ferelden and Orlais again. Lovely - loads of factions to join/betray, lots of conflict we can just jump into. There is also the potential for many more shades of grey, which I would personally enjoy very much. 

But elements from both Origins and DA2 should be weaved in - what happened with Morrigan/the Eluvian and possible god-child? Where did the Warden disappear to and why? Are the other Old Gods stirring? Is Vengeance still alive? Is the Kirkwall hellmouth veil about to explode and turn the entire population into abominations? Okay, maybe not that last one.

Agree with shantisands' post much earlier in this thread - they need to take the positive things from both games and combine them into Something Amazing. Should be simple enough, right Bio? 

ps It could be just me, but lots of factions, a potentially very large landscape, a whole world at war etc - seems DA3 might be gearing up to have a very large multiplayer component. 

[_Aine_]

AllThatJazz wrote...

ps It could be just me, but lots of factions, a potentially very large landscape, a whole world at war etc - seems DA3 might be gearing up to have a very large multiplayer component. 

totally agree with the build-up for the next world being better as a continuation from DA2.  There is a world in a state of almost complete conflict.  Lots to work with there.  

And i think you may be right about the multiplayer aspect of it....

[TEWR]

shantisands wrote...

AllThatJazz wrote...

ps It could be just me, but lots of factions, a potentially very large landscape, a whole world at war etc - seems DA3 might be gearing up to have a very large multiplayer component. 

totally agree with the build-up for the next world being better as a continuation from DA2.  There is a world in a state of almost complete conflict.  Lots to work with there.  

And i think you may be right about the multiplayer aspect of it....

God I hope they're not so foolish as to put multiplayer in Dragon Age. That would destroy their fanbase and leave them with barely anyone who still likes the series

[Selphie12]

Personally I'd like a new story. In Da:O I pretty much filled in the blanks in terms of what happened to my Warden after the end credits. I liked that. It made the whole thing a bit more personal. Regardless of what happened in DA2, my Wardens story is still untouched in my head.
I'd like if the new game were set in a later time period than that of the previous games. I mean it MIGHT be fun to play a new gme with all the mage/templar stuff in it, but as far as I'm concerned, that's for Hawke to deal with in DLC. I'd rather see a new world as a result of these things. For instance, maybe in DA3, it'd be 50 years after the mages war and the circle was abolished?
I dunno, I think the potential for a new story would be better. I've heard in countless interviews where devs have compared ME and DA saying that while ME was mostly about Shepherd, DA is very much centred on the companions and the world. If that's true, I'd like to see how Thedas would evolve as a result of these actions rather than dwelling on the actions themselves. That really makes it less about the world and more about that specific conflict to me.

And as a sidenote, I do agree with the above post, I can't see a DA multiplayer working. Especially since with the choices in DA, it should be a personal story. You can't have something personal when you've got someone else trying to pull the story elsewhere.

[Feanor_II]

Finally after beating the game I believe that after DA2 an interesting setting has been established, they should continue the story at this point but I don't think that the direction taken in DA2 is the one they should follow.

[Gillborn]

I would say continue the story from DA origins.Many things were covered in mystery while in DA2 it was all about templar/mage conflicts.And i would like to see my warden again even in a side story coming as a wonderer trying to repent for his actions or warn the hero for what's about to come in the world