150 réponses à ce sujet

[Ianamus]

XFemShepX wrote...

...As much as I really hate to say this, I agree.  That trailer really did nothing for me, and I kind of cringed at Shep floating backwards and firing a turret at a walking Reaper.

I'm hoping they put out a trailer that is less CoD-ish crazy combat and more character/story focused.  I know they'll do one eventually.  Here's hoping.

I agree with you completely about the floating, I think the animation was a bit off. That said, I'm glad to see that battles against the reapers involve more than just shooting at them and ducking behind cover. One of my problems with the ME1/2 combat was that it could get repetitive after awhile.

I’m also a bit disappointed by the trailers. I already knew that it would be actiony, and that there were grenades and everything, and that’s all there really was. Kinect doesn’t matter to me either, since I don’t play on the X-Box.
I was really hoping to see some of the new characters, or some of the re-worked older characters, and while seeing Legion was nice it would have been good to see what this new James Vega guy looks like at least.
I just don’t feel like I really learnt anything new about the game.

Modifié par EJ107, 06 juin 2011 - 08:35 .

[XFemShepX]

Reapinger wrote...

Sorry but actually beating reapers requires action and shooting... If that makes it a shooter then I guess you're being rigid. The whole point of the series was to beat the reapers and I hate to say but you can't talk them to death. I'm sure there will be side quests before and after and other RPG elements but that will be on hold for some of the campaign or reserved for after when there aren't 2km long machines destroying your home world. 

Well, duh.

All I'm saying is that I wasn't too psyched about that trailer, and look forward to seeing more of the actual *story*.  I know they'll put more trailers out that will show that eventually.  Just like I assume you have, I've played the whole series and all the DLC, you know.

I love how people around here assume you're an idiot if you have a differing opinion.  Really.  <_<

[Reapinger]

XFemShepX wrote...

Reapinger wrote...

Sorry but actually beating reapers requires action and shooting... If that makes it a shooter then I guess you're being rigid. The whole point of the series was to beat the reapers and I hate to say but you can't talk them to death. I'm sure there will be side quests before and after and other RPG elements but that will be on hold for some of the campaign or reserved for after when there aren't 2km long machines destroying your home world. 

Well, duh.

All I'm saying is that I wasn't too psyched about that trailer, and look forward to seeing more of the actual *story*.  I know they'll put more trailers out that will show that eventually.  Just like I assume you have, I've played the whole series and all the DLC, you know.

I love how people around here assume you're an idiot if you have a differing opinion.  Really.  <_<

Not at all, I think that EA is doing this to draw people into the series showcasing the action. I have faith that interaction and RPG elements will come within and after the story. People that watch E3 want to see all those tihngs and its a commericalism/advertisement thing unfortunately. 

[Reapinger]

Watching the Extended edition of the trailer on Spike.

[lazuli]

Phaedon wrote...




Shepard uses charge, background, possibly Sur'Kesh?

Is that really Charge?  I hope Shepard doesn't shrink into a little ball of light to Charge like Tela Vasir in LotSB.  I'll miss the animation from ME2.  I wonder if replacing Shepard's model with VFX will make Charge less buggy.  It might remove the problem of not being able to Charge when Shepard's back is to a wall (no room for the backswing animation).

[Jzadek72]

Reapinger wrote...

Watching the Extended edition of the trailer on Spike.

Can you post it here?

[Reapinger]

Wrex is waiting for the Krogan Princess on Shur'Kesh. Mordin says so and they also say that Cerberus operatives are indoctrinated. Atlas is a controllable suit in the story.

[Jzadek72]

Wrex, eh?

Shepard.

[Reapinger]

Jzadek72 wrote...

Reapinger wrote...

Watching the Extended edition of the trailer on Spike.

Can you post it here?

IDK how it was on live TV. 

[Moiaussi]

Just watched an interview. Casey was asked about RPG elements and his response was that there will be greatly expanded RPG elements, that ME3 will have a greater degree of choice in terms of power/skill development. Not a word about story elements or otherwise non character development choices.

Edit: Nm, just saw another trailer where Shepard has a choice how to deal with a child in a ventilation shaft, so I am back to hopeful

Modifié par Moiaussi, 06 juin 2011 - 09:10 .

[Aimi]

Moiaussi wrote...

Just watched an interview. Casey was asked about RPG elements and his response was that there will be greatly expanded RPG elements, that ME3 will have a greater degree of choice in terms of power/skill development. Not a word about story elements or otherwise non character development choices.

Of course not.  The demo was there to showcase combat, and talking about other things would've meant going off script.

[TexasToast712]

GOD DAMN YOU BIOWARE!

I wanted to see what the female Krogan looked like. I also dont like that they broke down and made ME3 support kinect. (yes I know I dont need it but I dont care) Kinect sucks.

In other words...........SWEET! Cant wait!

[Kaltrec]

Batarian husks? or something else?

[Babli]

So Ashley is really wearing that ****-outfit...

[Moiaussi]

daqs wrote...

Of course not.  The demo was there to showcase combat, and talking about other things would've meant going off script.

He was specificly asked about RPG though and that was the answer he gave. The other demo I saw later had a reassuring rpg-ish scene, but that kind of thing wasn't mentioned in the interview despite the question.

[Moiaussi]

Babli wrote...

So Ashley is really wearing that ****-outfit...

It could still be her shipboard suit or something... <crosses fingers>

[MrDizazta]

Kaltrec wrote...



Batarian husks? or something else?

They are called Cannibals

[k177sh0t]

Something tells me Anderson did not made it jumping unto the Normandy



Just a hunch

[Thompson family]

Has anybody mentioned yet that EDI's alive and on our side? That was the biggest relief and revelation to me. It's in the gamplay demo that Casey Hudson introduced, as the Normandy does that precision bombing run right over the Reaper hole. She's talking to Shep.

[Wulfram]

Is shooting that turret at the reaper actually supposed to do anything, or is Shepard just bored and decided to waste some ammo?

[Bolboreta]

I have the bad feeling that Mordin is going to die :_(

At first, I thought it was going to be Anderson, because he's a squad member in the early game.

[Jzadek72]

TexasToast712 wrote...

GOD DAMN YOU BIOWARE!

I wanted to see what the female Krogan looked like. I also dont like that they broke down and made ME3 support kinect. (yes I know I dont need it but I dont care) Kinect sucks.

In other words...........SWEET! Cant wait!

Your avatar suits your rant. Which I agree with, BTW. Especially after the next game actually seemed to be using Kinect competently. Not enough to make me buy it, but enough to put Bioware to shame.

[Reapinger]

Jzadek72 wrote...

TexasToast712 wrote...

GOD DAMN YOU BIOWARE!

I wanted to see what the female Krogan looked like. I also dont like that they broke down and made ME3 support kinect. (yes I know I dont need it but I dont care) Kinect sucks.

In other words...........SWEET! Cant wait!

Your avatar suits your rant. Which I agree with, BTW. Especially after the next game actually seemed to be using Kinect competently. Not enough to make me buy it, but enough to put Bioware to shame.

I mean it's optional and I kinda like it, lol.  Just play without it? It won't take away from the game experience!

[Jzadek72]

That's what they say about multiplayer. But everything they do costs resources. They could spend the time and money spent integrating Kinect on something more worthwhile.

[Walker White]

Jzadek72 wrote...

That's what they say about multiplayer. But everything they do costs resources. They could spend the time and money spent integrating Kinect on something more worthwhile.

It is very possible that Microsoft has paid them to do Kinect.  Hence providing them with the resources.