Alpez glad we can keep this civil... it is actually a bit refreshing.
Now here's the key point, all of these things have to mesh up and work in a continous story arc, the problem is that no matter how its written (good or bad) no matter how they story arc plays out, cerberus loyalists won't accept any outcome that doesn't either paint TIM as a super genius with a master plan or a misunderstood hero.
To me if they don't give the option that is more like a slap to the face to some and bad writing to others. It also pretty much pisses all over the renegade train of thought and their actions in ME2.
We need to gather allies in me3, allies that may not want to work for someone who works with Cerberus, something they have already shown us by not allowing us to work with the Alliance or Council in me2. Its a similar thing with choosing a council made up entirely of humans, you immediately create a level of distrust amongs alien races.
I find the council to be actually useless. Something that they don't help humanity and well in 50 years humanity rose to high heights in power that is great but to punish them for it... means that i will only help the council or aid the council or request aid when it benefits humanity as they seem to be on the same mindset we help humans when it benefits us.... we won't help their colonies we see no benefit in it.
Who said Cerberus can't have allies? I never claimed to go pure renegade.... actually in my games I am generally 70 30 renegade paragon. I have Rachni and the Krogan cure.... I made sure to keep the overlord project running just in case the geth get some reprogramming.... I told the quarians to make peace after nuking the rogue geth. Sorry but brainwashing to me is not something I'd do because if I could do it the opponents could easily do it back. Thus domination is preferable. So I have the quarians, geth, krogan and rachni.... Earth Alliance will come along and Cerberus would be behind the scene.((maybe))? Do I expect to win.... maybe... maybe not... but I plan to give a good fight.
Given the choice Cerberus on your side and no one else or everyone else but no cerberus who would you pick? and logically is it possible that the rest of the galaxy would just ignore every action cerberus has ever taken and accept their help knowing what goal cerberus ultimately wants?
First question Everyone else. Second Logically speaking yes, yes they would. Here is why: In the area of genocide and survival from genocide morality and ethics are very cloudy. War makes the strangest bedfellows. Here is a hypothetical.
You take a Wahabist, a Salafist and a sociopathic Shia give them all knives... and leave them in a room with 10 random Americans... The 3 with knives know that the 10 will overpower them if they do not act in unison. So they put aside their differences and proceed to butcher the 10 for survival. The Salafist and Wahabist being Sunni then proceed to kill the Shia if the Shia still lives. So yes War, Blackmail, Genocide all can make strange bedfellows.
At once again the people that hate Cerberus seem to only be able to paint TIM as a monster and a villain and nothing else? Could it be that he is a Villain and a Hero? Or a Genius and a Monster that fights for humanity?
The thing is I see no middle ground really on either camp but since BW has yet to make anything but a few minute demo which just says "Cerberus has been indoctrinated." Could just mean 1 or 2 cells or it could mean the entire organization and what the pro cerberus camp pretty much thinks if its the entire organization thats horrid writing as the renegade shep has pretty much been pro cerberus... Why kill your loyal minion?
And TIM being indoctrinated since ME1 makes sense to me whatsoever. If he was indoctrinated Why would he get Sheps body back from the shadow broker and prevent it from going to the collectors if the collectors serve the reapers... If he is indoctrinated in ME3 that to me is poor writing... once again my opinions on the whole indoctrination thing.
Modifié par AesirMan, 14 juillet 2011 - 11:13 .