64 réponses à ce sujet

[nisallik]

Then how did you pay more than $7 for DLC? Shale is a free purchase for anyone who buys the game new. Warden's Keep is the only new DLC we can purchase.

[chiliztri]

Darviathar wrote...

Are you retarded?  I didn't buy the game used.  I don't know what gave you that impression.

If you did not buy the game used, then it is theoretically impossible for you to have payed over $20 on DLC.

Since, Stone Prisoner comes with every copy of DA:O free of charge.

[Beertastic]

Darviathar wrote...

Crawling_Chaos wrote...

Darviathar wrote...

Lucy_Glitter wrote...
Your face is inexcusably bad.

As if I care?

Did you spend all night tweaking yours?  If i wanted to do that, I'd download second life.

That doesn't excuse you from buying a game used.

You got the perfect punishment for commiting such an attrocity.

I hope you wallow in your squandered 22 dollars for much time to come.

Are you retarded?  I didn't buy the game used.  I don't know what gave you that impression.

Because every copy of the game comes with Stone Prisoner and Blood Dragon Armor FREE. You should not have paid 20$+ for DLC.

[Darviathar]

Eshaye wrote...

Lucy_Glitter wrote...

Your face is inexcusably bad.

Is it bad this made me chuckle?

But honestly speaking of Fallout 3, it's true Bethesda is actually releasing some good content there. BUT consider the Oblivion DLCs and laugh, a really long time... I guess they learned.

The only Fallout 3 DLC I do not have is the Space Zeta thingy one, the other ones if I recall right are on par with BioWare's take. The Pitt make take longer but that's because the fights can be tough depending on your level... There is a difference between these games though Fallout 3 makes you fight more and is slimmer on dialogue, while DA is the other way around, at least that's what it seems to me.

I enjoyed the Pitt.  One of the few times in computer gaming that a decision hasn't been obviously "black vs. white".  I thought the storyline was excellent, and one of the weapons gained from it because my weapon of choice for a long time.  The Anchorage expansion was weak (but still required more effort than either of the ones here).  Lookout Point was fairly good and required several hours of work.  I never attempted Broken Steel or Mothership Zeta.

[Sloth Of Doom]

I paid over one hundred million dollars for this game and I demand it b slightly longer it was only barely worth that much money

[Dr. Explosion]

Crawling_Chaos wrote...
<swearing and insults removed>

/end-thread

but I want a nug ear helmet...

Modifié par Torias, 21 novembre 2009 - 11:33 .

[Darviathar]

veryalien wrote...

Well get used to it. Bioware seems to believe we want 1-hour adventures for about $5-$7. They seem to have no interest in actually adding anything beyond this. At least none they've spoken about.

If you don't like it then don't buy anymore DLC. That's what I'm probably going to do. Send a clear message that being nickle and dimed over tiny dungeons isn't going to cut it.

I honestly suspect this is the Electronic Arts influence.  Sims 3 is the absolute worst; trying to sell individual hairstyles within the game for real money.

[BluesMan1956]

Crawling_Chaos wrote...

<swearing and insults removed>

/end-thread

Or a troll.. 
I'm sorry we were supposed to end the thread there, werem't we?

Modifié par Torias, 21 novembre 2009 - 11:33 .

[xIc3x]

You guys, I think he means that you can buy the normal edition for 50 bucks, or the digital deluxe one for 65. Which is still only 15 bucks hmm, maybe he got wardens keep twice? Or bought the collectors edition + wardens keep, I think only the digital one comes with wardens keep for free. I'm not sure though, I got the digital one

It's your own fault people are calling you stupid lol, you STILL haven't explained

Modifié par xIc3x, 20 novembre 2009 - 05:00 .

[jdeneweth]

I suspect the enraged people that paid $22 of their hard earned money (up hill, both ways) couldn't be bothered to realize that the stone prisoner DLC came free with any new copy of the game. If this is the case you are absolutely correct, its not worth $15 for something you already have for free.

If you bought the game used and are complaining then you should consider buying new games to support developers or at the very least not be surprised when companies try to make money in response to the used game market.

Modifié par jdeneweth, 20 novembre 2009 - 05:03 .

[Sloth Of Doom]

Darviathar wrote...

Crawling_Chaos wrote...

Fission Mailed^^^^

Sorry but I had to.

Keep up the sniveling, by all means.  At least until you slip between the cracks in the floor where you belong.

Well, it would hlp if yu told us how you spent hat much on DLC.   Until you do so it seems like your oiginal post is based in lies.  Why would you expect anyone to treat a blatent liar nicely?

[addiction21]

Darviathar wrote...

I thought Fallout 3 had some weak DLC's, but the two available for this game make them look epic in proportion.  I cannot recall the last time I felt such a sense of having wasted my money.  Paying a total of 20+$, I expected more than this.  Simple dungeons that can be completed in about an hour is not going to cut it. 

You deserve losing your money and being disapointment. No ones fault but your own so suck it up and stop ya ****ing.

[xIc3x]

I think including free dlc is an awesome way to push new game sales. I can't wait until people start coming to the forums to **** because they bought the game used for 5 bucks off and have to buy all the dlc now hahaha

[Crackerjaquebox]

Not that I'm taking his side.... But once you've used the *Free codes that you received with your game, you can't use them again.



I haven't had to reload my game, but I have been under the assumption that if I had to, I would have to pay for Stone Prisoner, and Blood Dragon because I got them through *Free codes with my video game purchase.

[J.O.G]

Crackerjaquebox wrote...

Not that I'm taking his side.... But once you've used the *Free codes that you received with your game, you can't use them again.

I haven't had to reload my game, but I have been under the assumption that if I had to, I would have to pay for Stone Prisoner, and Blood Dragon because I got them through *Free codes with my video game purchase.

You used the codes on the EA account, they are stored here

So yes if you forget your login data or EA goes bankrupt and closes this site, your DLC is lost as soon as you have to reinstall. Otherwise you can reinstall as often as you want.

Modifié par J.O.G, 21 novembre 2009 - 10:27 .

[Joshua Raven]

Crawling_Chaos wrote...

I payed 7 dollars total for all of my DLC, so I don't know what you did there.

Maybe you bought this game used, in which case you'd deserve all the disappointment you got and more.

I can't believe this comment, you're basically saying he is a bad person for buying something second hand? Seriously, go think over what you just said and come back and apologize. So if someone buys your car because they don't have the money for a new one you'll laugh at him too? Pah, well done EA, you just managed to make another customer into your propaganda slave.

[xIc3x]

Joshua Raven wrote...

Crawling_Chaos wrote...

I payed 7 dollars total for all of my DLC, so I don't know what you did there.

Maybe you bought this game used, in which case you'd deserve all the disappointment you got and more.

I can't believe this comment, you're basically saying he is a bad person for buying something second hand? Seriously, go think over what you just said and come back and apologize. So if someone buys your car because they don't have the money for a new one you'll laugh at him too? Pah, well done EA, you just managed to make another customer into your propaganda slave.

Buying used games is a **** move, you save like 5 or 10 bucks and you deny the people who made it any kind of profit. I'm all for 15 dollar dlc that you get for free with a new copy .

[Spaceweed10]

Darviathar wrote...

I thought Fallout 3 had some weak DLC's, but the two available for this game make them look epic in proportion.  I cannot recall the last time I felt such a sense of having wasted my money.  Paying a total of 20+$, I expected more than this.  Simple dungeons that can be completed in about an hour is not going to cut it. 

Don't buy them then - fixed.

[Spaceweed10]

chiliztri wrote...

Darviathar wrote...

Are you retarded?  I didn't buy the game used.  I don't know what gave you that impression.

If you did not buy the game used, then it is theoretically impossible for you to have payed over $20 on DLC.

Since, Stone Prisoner comes with every copy of DA:O free of charge.

Owned.

[TheAlarmist]

xIc3x wrote...

Buying used games is a **** move, you save like 5 or 10 bucks and you deny the people who made it any kind of profit.

Nobody is being denied anything. The studio have received it's profit. Ownership has been transferred.

Is buying a used car a **** move? Is buying antiques a **** move? Is buying various collectibles off E-bay a **** move? 
Is _renting_ a game a **** move? How about renting a movie or a car or special purpose contruction tool?

In all of the above the original producer/distributor has been payed per their satisfaction and ownership has been transferred.

What quality of games makes them unigue in the world of commerce that they should only ever be purchased new and then never to be used again but by their original post wholesale owner if ever?

[slikster]

^ Licences are not property. DLC is licensed content.

[bjdbwea]

Solution: Don't like it, don't buy it. Serves me well. If enough people act the same, the DLC rip-off business will stop. Until then, at least we save some money.

[TheAlarmist]

slikster wrote...

^ Licences are not property. DLC is licensed content.

Correct but I my post was not about DLC. No one said anything about buying used DLC or that doing so was a ***move.

(However that broaches several interesting topics for debate but we'll get to those later.)

Question stands as posted.


[Just a quick PS FYI edit. Licences are indeed property. They just happen to be property that are usually revocable and non-assignable (aka non transferrable.) But I took your meaning.  ]

Modifié par TheAlarmist, 21 novembre 2009 - 11:46 .

[Spaghetti_Ninja]

Another crybaby topic by some crybaby moron.

[Lyrandori]

So what if the OP thinks the DLCs are bad, it's not like BioWare can go back in time and "repair" it for Mr. Disappointed. What's the goal for the replies here? To change the OP's mind about it? He says it's inexcusable, well that's it then, it's pretty much carved in rock for him, whatever we tell him he'll think we're wrong since it's inexcusably bad, not just "bad", it's ultimately bad.



I say let him think what he wants and the rest of us including myself will quickly forget about this thread and the OP, that way everyone is happy, the OP doesn't have anyone to **** against and we don't feed his hatred anymore, cool, no? I just wanted to come by and talk to all the repliers here, just let him be guys, what we can do about this anyway, it's pointless.