The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Isn't it confirmed that there is no multiplayer?
MarchWaltz wrote...
I remember one time when I thought that Mass Effect would never come to the ps3, and that there will be no kinetic for ME3.
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
charmingcharlie wrote...
The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Isn't it confirmed that there is no multiplayer?
No it is not confirmed, all the statements with regard to MP in ME 3 by Bioware staff have been vague half answers which give them enough leeway to put MP in ME 3 and go "derp derp we never said we wouldn't put MP in now did we".
Bogsnot1 wrote...
I see that, and give you this...battleroyale565 wrote...
Why would Bioware even bother to debunk this moronic rumor, considering how many different links(all of which claim to have their own "mole") and the biblical level flood of threads about it it's obviously the best free advertising ever.
Modifié par Someone With Mass, 17 juin 2011 - 04:11 .
Turgen Starblazer wrote...
Don't know why people would get upset over ADDING another feature. Seems silly, and stubborn to me. If there is multiplayer cool; if not, no biggie. The continuation of the Sheppard story is my main investment in this game. But I'm welcome to more content.
RyuGuitarFreak wrote...
DLC, Kinect, multiplayer.
Therefore_I_Am wrote...
Turgen Starblazer wrote...
Don't know why people would get upset over ADDING another feature. Seems silly, and stubborn to me. If there is multiplayer cool; if not, no biggie. The continuation of the Sheppard story is my main investment in this game. But I'm welcome to more content.
the continuation of his story should be the only thing that should be focused on. MP feature would take away development time and resources when making a fullblown single player experience. Look at how big the ME2 game was in terms of locations, backstories, characters, and dialog. Now imagine all of that reduced by half or more.
EMHologram wrote...
In the Game Informer issue where the first large amount of information of the game came out, Casey Hudson said that they wanted Multiplayer, but it was determined that they wouldn't be able to do it well, so they left it out. I would take anything from that article with a grain of salt, as it doesn't look very reliable, especially when you look at some of their other articles they have put out. <_<
EMHologram wrote...
In the Game Informer issue where the first large amount of information of the game came out, Casey Hudson said that they wanted Multiplayer, but it was determined that they wouldn't be able to do it well, so they left it out. I would take anything from that article with a grain of salt, as it doesn't look very reliable, especially when you look at some of their other articles they have put out. <_<
Casey Hudson In Game Informer wrote ....
"We haven't YET come up with a way to do that, so we don't have anything to announce at this time. But obviously muliplayer is something we want to do more of in the future as a company".
Modifié par charmingcharlie, 17 juin 2011 - 04:32 .
Therefore_I_Am wrote...
Turgen Starblazer wrote...
Don't know why people would get upset over ADDING another feature. Seems silly, and stubborn to me. If there is multiplayer cool; if not, no biggie. The continuation of the Sheppard story is my main investment in this game. But I'm welcome to more content.
the continuation of his story should be the only thing that should be focused on. MP feature would take away development time and resources when making a fullblown single player experience. Look at how big the ME2 game was in terms of locations, backstories, characters, and dialog. Now imagine all of that reduced by half or more.
Modifié par Turgen Starblazer, 17 juin 2011 - 04:35 .
charmingcharlie wrote...
EMHologram wrote...
In the Game Informer issue where the first large amount of information of the game came out, Casey Hudson said that they wanted Multiplayer, but it was determined that they wouldn't be able to do it well, so they left it out. I would take anything from that article with a grain of salt, as it doesn't look very reliable, especially when you look at some of their other articles they have put out. <_<
That is NOT what he said, this is what he said :-Casey Hudson In Game Informer wrote ....
"We haven't YET come up with a way to do that, so we don't have anything to announce at this time. But obviously muliplayer is something we want to do more of in the future as a company".
Now I do not see anywhere in that quote him saying "there will be no MP in Mass Effect 3. All I see him saying is "we aint going to tell you yet".
Flashlegend wrote...
Therefore_I_Am wrote...
Turgen Starblazer wrote...
Don't know why people would get upset over ADDING another feature. Seems silly, and stubborn to me. If there is multiplayer cool; if not, no biggie. The continuation of the Sheppard story is my main investment in this game. But I'm welcome to more content.
the continuation of his story should be the only thing that should be focused on. MP feature would take away development time and resources when making a fullblown single player experience. Look at how big the ME2 game was in terms of locations, backstories, characters, and dialog. Now imagine all of that reduced by half or more.
lol, don't be ridiculous. I'm pretty sure a few months back the devs said ME3 is already playable, from beginning to end. Having a MP might take some resources away but the ME team knows what they're doing. And from what we've seen and heard so far, there really is no reason to believe that ME3 won't be better than its predecessors. Just adding a MP does not destroy a game. Focusing entirely on it does, and the ME team clearly isn't.
Modifié par Therefore_I_Am, 17 juin 2011 - 04:46 .
Therefore_I_Am wrote...
Flashlegend wrote...
Therefore_I_Am wrote...
Turgen Starblazer wrote...
Don't know why people would get upset over ADDING another feature. Seems silly, and stubborn to me. If there is multiplayer cool; if not, no biggie. The continuation of the Sheppard story is my main investment in this game. But I'm welcome to more content.
the continuation of his story should be the only thing that should be focused on. MP feature would take away development time and resources when making a fullblown single player experience. Look at how big the ME2 game was in terms of locations, backstories, characters, and dialog. Now imagine all of that reduced by half or more.
lol, don't be ridiculous. I'm pretty sure a few months back the devs said ME3 is already playable, from beginning to end. Having a MP might take some resources away but the ME team knows what they're doing. And from what we've seen and heard so far, there really is no reason to believe that ME3 won't be better than its predecessors. Just adding a MP does not destroy a game. Focusing entirely on it does, and the ME team clearly isn't.
It would make the gameplay more linear no matter the scale of which it's implemented, I can tell you that much. Take away the whole galaxy map, choosing on where you want to go. This of course if they implement one of those MP devices where you have to beat the game first, so they leave all of the exploration out on release, and instead put it in as DLC.
Shadowflare_XIII wrote...
......what?....no, your not getting a d@mn endorsement now, ask one of these guys....here, ask the one over there dragging his nuts over a Quarian saying "Haloz" like he's on meth....Joker, get the Normandy ready were f#%ing leaving.)
EMHologram wrote...
Even so, the site is still hardly reliable. Looking through their previous articles, they seem to report a lot of completely unconfirmed rumors.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
