3 réponses à ce sujet

[mitch shepard for ash]

so was just wondering when casey hudson said that bad coices from me1 and me2 wouldnt make the game uncompletable just how winable the war is made me wonder if it turns out that my previous decisions in the first two games were bad to i have accept that i wont beat the reappers afterall and go back right through every game to make it right coz tht will suck

[Bogsnot1]

Awww, poor diddums doesnt want to suffer any consequences for acting like an ****.

[ADelusiveMan]

I think it will be the same for all endings - Reapers defeated. But the aftermath - such as the political and social landscape afterwords...is what will be different.

[mitch shepard for ash]

ADelusiveMan wrote...

I think it will be the same for all endings - Reapers defeated. But the aftermath - such as the political and social landscape afterwords...is what will be different.

yh i guess that would make more sense i just think maybe that yh evryones choices from 1 and 2 carrying over is gr8 thats what mass effect is all about changing situations slightly to make it more perssonall but i kinda think aswell that the coices from me3 should mainly be what contributes to the overall ending of the mass effect series coz some ppl arent going to be bothered to do the first two again if they made wrong choices and ppl who are starting at me3 dont really controll the events of the previous 2.
but for example i was thinking will effects of choices even out to the overall contribution of the war effot for example i killed the rachni so i may have lost an ally there but i rewrote the geth heretics so i may gain an ally there to make up for my bad rachni choice maybe i dont know just some of my thoughts intrested to hear other ppls choices they made