Shepard Lives wrote...
What do you think?
He means there will be fewer squadmates but each one will have more dialogue and character development. And frankly, I wouldn't have it any other way.
indeed.
Shepard Lives wrote...
What do you think?
He means there will be fewer squadmates but each one will have more dialogue and character development. And frankly, I wouldn't have it any other way.
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Someone With Mass wrote...
Quality before quantity. Just the way I like it.
Guest_SwobyJ_*
SteelRaptor wrote...
Let's just say your squad is being..... "streamlined" *runs for cover*
Guest_SwobyJ_*
SalsaDMA wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
Quality before quantity. Just the way I like it.
No. Quality would have meant that all the characters would have gotten depth. Rather than just give some characters depth, and some characters cameos.
I dunno how you can define seeing half a dozen of characters as cameos without depth as "quality" rather than "quantity".
Guest_Montezuma IV_*
SalsaDMA wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
Quality before quantity. Just the way I like it.
No. Quality would have meant that all the characters would have gotten depth. Rather than just give some characters depth, and some characters cameos.
I dunno how you can define seeing half a dozen of characters as cameos without depth as "quality" rather than "quantity".
Guest_mrsph_*
mrsph wrote...
Fewer squadmates makes it easier to write stuff like banter, give them more abilities so they aren't clones, and generally improve the game.
Whatever666343431431654324 wrote...
My guess is that we'll lose the non-LI. So off the squad:
Mordin (we already saw him in a non-squad role)
Legion (we already saw him in a non-squad role)
Grunt
Samara
Zaeed
Kasumi
Modifié par Whole Particle, 10 juin 2011 - 10:02 .
Guest_mrsph_*
SalsaDMA wrote...
Since when was "easier" or "faster to make" a sign of "quality" ?
mrsph wrote...
SalsaDMA wrote...
Since when was "easier" or "faster to make" a sign of "quality" ?
Because they can pack more stuff in with 6-8 people than they can with 10-12 people.
SalsaDMA wrote...
mrsph wrote...
SalsaDMA wrote...
Since when was "easier" or "faster to make" a sign of "quality" ?
Because they can pack more stuff in with 6-8 people than they can with 10-12 people.
Or... They could have taken the time and money to pack the same depth in with 10-12 people as with 6-8 people.
It's a cost savings thing. Nothing else.
Eradyn wrote...
SalsaDMA wrote...
mrsph wrote...
SalsaDMA wrote...
Since when was "easier" or "faster to make" a sign of "quality" ?
Because they can pack more stuff in with 6-8 people than they can with 10-12 people.
Or... They could have taken the time and money to pack the same depth in with 10-12 people as with 6-8 people.
It's a cost savings thing. Nothing else.
There is only a finite amount of time and money devoted to any project. Resources are not infinite, as anyone running a project is aware, and scope creep is a killer. BW could have gone either way, but realistically not both; I am very pleased BW is going for quality over quantity.
Guest_mrsph_*
SalsaDMA wrote...
Or... They could have taken the time and money to pack the same depth in with 10-12 people as with 6-8 people.
It's a cost savings thing. Nothing else.
Shepard Lives wrote...
What do you think?
He means there will be fewer squadmates but each one will have more dialogue and character development. And frankly, I wouldn't have it any other way.
Cancer Puppet wrote...
Shepard Lives wrote...
What do you think?
He means there will be fewer squadmates but each one will have more dialogue and character development. And frankly, I wouldn't have it any other way.
Well, more characters AND more depth...
IsaacShep wrote...
Sure thing: twitter.com/#!/CaseyDHudson/status/69607879346356224 and then he said it again in BioWare Pulse Q&AWhatever666343431431654324 wrote...
Can you point me to that confirmation? I've never actually heard that was confirmed.In the video interview I can't remember which one ATM, theyWhatever666343431431654324 wrote...
I can certainly see it as possible that an LI will be given a non-squad role but I can't imagine Bioware not letting the player conclude the romantic arc. And considering that your ME1 LI and ME2 LI will apparently fight over you, Bioware is going to face a wall of rage if they don't give them all fair treatment. It will be of DA2 epic proportions.
He did say that even though they may not be in your party there will still be romance content with them though, something along these lines if I remember correctly
Modifié par Whatever666343431431654324, 10 juin 2011 - 10:43 .
Shepard Lives wrote...
Cancer Puppet wrote...
Shepard Lives wrote...
What do you think?
He means there will be fewer squadmates but each one will have more dialogue and character development. And frankly, I wouldn't have it any other way.
Well, more characters AND more depth...
Oh of course. Why not also wish for world peace, the cure for cancer and domesticated dinosaurs for everyone, while we're at it?