Aller au contenu

Photo

The trouble with Morinth.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
447 réponses à ce sujet

#176
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 683 messages

luk4s3d wrote...

Morinth didnt really have a choice in ME2 did she.


And you dont think Sheps gonna be asking anyone who can fight for help in ME3?

You mean besides refusing/fleeing at shore leave/using the secret of her recruitment to blackmail Shepard, or any combination of the above?

Because that's a lot of 'except.' Shepard didn't even need to coerce her: she volunteered without being asked.

I mean were not desperate, are we?  Oh sorry, thats right, we are!

What are we desperate for? The combined naval and military forces of the galaxy...

...or a pseudo-cult of mall cops?


Now, infringment on the honor of the Justicars aside, it's important to remember what they are not... and that's a major military force.

#177
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 083 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

The fact that the Code needed an addendum to specify that Justicars need to respect Asari common law should rather serve as evidence that the Code is not Asari law, but rather the codification of a private group. If the Justicars were the source or basis of Asari law, that wouldn't be necessary. Justicars are just a reflection of a group's interpretation of Asari law, plus the Code.


More like the Code is the Asari Law and any local laws are additional.

You leave out the fact that that assendum was put there because questionable politicians didn't want the law bitting them in the ass. They make a mistake, conscious or otherwise, and they are in trouble.


Codex: Justicars...

Justicars tend to be independent, requiring little help but also scorning it since such advanced skill and experience usually travels with a powerful ego. The conflicts presented by such arrogance prompted the Justicar Order to develop the Oaths of Subsumation. The oaths pledge protection of the innocent, the punishment of the guilty, and defence of common law and the norms of asari society. The effect of the Oaths is conservative, ensuring that justicars respect the existing distribution of asari power rather than staging a coup to rearrange society according to justicar satisfation. Nevertheless, the possibility of such an attack is a source of anxiety -- and counter-intelligence -- among the asari elite.


Codex: Justicars...

Despite the refinement and sophistication of asari culture, criminality remains a fact of life. The asari solution to the most vicious and destructive criminal element is the Justicar Order.


Like I said, if the asari as a people did not support the Code there would be no justicars. For instance, if we had guys like The Punisher or Batman running around they would be arrested because they fall outside the law. No one tolerates groups that fall outside their own laws. We don't even tolerate Mormon's right to practice polygamy.

Dean_the_Young wrote...

As a self-created group without government sanction, the Justicars have only as much claim to be the purest representation of Asari law as any other group. That Asari culture tolerates them does not imply anything else but that the Asari culture tolerates them.


You can't say that the Code is not asari law, but all the cops and civilians defer to a justicar's judgement without question. "Without government sanction" my ass. An extra-judicial order implies government sanction.

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Illium is an Asari world as referred to by nearly all the Asari who live on it. The reason that Samara was a considerable risk wasn't because Illium was not an Asari world, but rather simply because Illium was a place non-Asari frequent.


Illium is an asari world like Noveria is a human world. Noveria is not an Alliance world nomore than Illium is a Republic world.

Modifié par The Twilight God, 11 juillet 2011 - 01:11 .


#178
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 083 messages

littlezack wrote...

The Twilight God wrote...

littlezack wrote...

There's a big difference between respecting something and following it. I respect lots of religions beyond my own, and I wouldn't impede anyone's ability to practice their religion so long as it didn't bother me. But I don't believe in their religion, nor does my respect hinge on it. 


I don't beat my wife. But I respect husbands who do and sit back while a guy beats the living daylight out of his wife in a public park.



Yeah, that really isn't an adequate analogy. My point was that just because the Asari as a whole respect and honor Justicars, that doesn't make that they're bound by the code. There's nothing that suggests that Justicars are recognized as the official law of Asaris. If that were the case, than most of the Asari we meet would be like Samara.


They are bound by the Code. Otherwise, how could a justicar kill them if they didn't fall under the Code? Why would police defer to their judgement if they weren't under the Code. EVERY Republic citizen is under the Code. Do they have to all be justicars and enforce it to the letter? No. But they are ALL under its juristiction. Similarly I am under the law of the United States. Do I have to enforce it? No. Must I agree with it? No. If found guilty of violating it can I be punished? Yes.

And it was a very adequate analogy. You just don't want to associate all asari values with justicar values. There are no justicars without the consent of the asari republic. Period. You think Samara is a heartless ****? Fine. You also think they're all heartless ****es for creating the order and letting them do what they were created for. Otherwise, you'd be a hypocrite. 

It's easy to single out an individual and ignore everyone else who made them possible. 

Modifié par The Twilight God, 11 juillet 2011 - 01:13 .


#179
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 683 messages
[quote]The Twilight God wrote...

[quote]Dean_the_Young wrote...

The fact that the Code needed an addendum to specify that Justicars need to respect Asari common law should rather serve as evidence that the Code is not Asari law, but rather the codification of a private group. If the Justicars were the source or basis of Asari law, that wouldn't be necessary. Justicars are just a reflection of a group's interpretation of Asari law, plus the Code.[/quote]

More like the Code is the Asari Law and any local laws are additional. [/quote]No, it really is like that the Code binds Justicars, and the Asari laws are a different body of words.

[quote]
You leave out the fact that that assendum was put there because questionable politicians didn't want the law bitting them in the ass. They make a mistake, conscious or otherwise, and they are in trouble. [/quote]Nothing at all sugests it was questionable politicians, or any sort of unreasonable concerns.
[quote]

[quote] Codex: Justicars...

Justicars tend to be independent, requiring little help but also scorning it since such advanced skill and experience usually travels with a powerful ego. The conflicts presented by such arrogance prompted the Justicar Order to develop the Oaths of Subsumation. The oaths pledge protection of the innocent, the punishment of the guilty, and defence of common law and the norms of asari society. The effect of the Oaths is conservative, ensuring that justicars respect the existing distribution of asari power rather than staging a coup to rearrange society according to justicar satisfation. Nevertheless, the possibility of such an attack is a source of anxiety -- and counter-intelligence -- among the asari elite.[/quote]
[quote] Codex: Justicars...

Despite the refinement and sophistication of asari culture, criminality remains a fact of life. The asari solution to the most vicious and destructive criminal element is the Justicar Order.

[/quote]

Like I said, if the asari as a people did not support the Code there would be no justicars. [/quote]Given that this is not true for nearly all organizations in Human history, why should it be true for the Asari? 

An organization does not need popular support to continue: it only needs not to be opposed in sufficient measure to rally its opponents. Cultural contexts and examples are endless, even in western history.

[quote]
For instance, if we had guys like The Punisher or Batman running around they would be arrested because they fall outside the law. No one tolerates groups that fall outside their own laws.
[/quote]Or if we had guys like the Punisher and Batman running around, we would have since formed a Justice League.

And yes, toleration for groups that fall outside their own laws is a fact of life for societies and governments.


[quote]We don't even tolerate Mormon's right to practice polygamy. [/quote]Mormons don't have a right to practice polygamy*.

*In so much that, no, minorities claiming rights doesn't mean that such a right actually exists if it is not accepted by a wider culture.


[quote]
[quote]Dean_the_Young wrote...

As a self-created group without government sanction, the Justicars have only as much claim to be the purest representation of Asari law as any other group. That Asari culture tolerates them does not imply anything else but that the Asari culture tolerates them. [/quote]

You can't say that the Code is not asari law, but all the cops and civilians defer to a justicar's judgement without question. "Without government sanction" my ass. [/quote]You can say just that. The widespread reverence of the Justicars is a cultural phenomenum of the Asari, and even Asari officials are still culturally Asari. It's the same concept as to why authorities in super hero comics accept super heroes.
[quote]
[quote]Dean_the_Young wrote...

Illium is an Asari world as referred to by nearly all the Asari who live on it. The reason that Samara was a considerable risk wasn't because Illium was not an Asari world, but rather simply because Illium was a place non-Asari frequent.[/quote]

Illium is an asari world like Noveria is a human world. Noveria is not an Alliance world nomore than Illium is a Republic world. [/quote]Besides that no one on Noveria ever claimed it to be an Alliance world? Or that it even had exceptional ties to the Alliance?

The better argument would be that Noveria isn't a Citadel space. And it isn't, except in so much that Noveria is within Citadel space, populated by Citadel citizens, funded by Citadel corporations, provides exceptional priviliges and authorities to Citadel member officials, services Citadel governments and persons, and acknowledges the authority of the right-hand of the Citadel Council.

In a similar forms of policy, China wasn't fighting the US in Korea, Iran is not conducting a nuclear weapons program, NATO is not at war with Libya.

#180
C9316

C9316
  • Members
  • 5 638 messages
This is why you kill her and spare yourself the trouble...

#181
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 083 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

No, it really is like that the Code binds Justicars, and the Asari laws are a different body of words.


So if a cop is taking a handcuffed suspect in for questioning and a Justicar shows up starts interrogating the suspect. The suspect is being hostile and will not speak. Justicar kills her and says she saw her shoot a victim last month, but she got away at the time. The cop did not have any knowledge of this. What do you think will happen next?

The cop will accept that getting any further information out of the dead suspect will not occur, nod and go about their business.  They will accept the judgement, claims and actions of the justicar as fullfilment of the law. If any random citizen or even another cop did this they would be arrested and would be a full on investigation into her actions. Justicars are governement sanctioned extra-judicial enforcers similar to Judge Dread. 

Justicars and the Code are asari law. The Code is in effect everywhere in Asari space. Local laws are just local laws. It's not so much that The Code is the only laws they have, but the Justicars themselves do what they do legally under the law. I think you may be thinking I'm saying the Code is the totality of asari law and nothing else. I'm sure regular cops follow different procedures and are more accountable for their actions, but like the SPECTREs, the justicars are within their right to do what they do. The law is on their side.

Codex: Justicars...

The effect of the Oaths is conservative, ensuring that justicars respect the existing distribution of asari power rather than staging a coup to rearrange society according to justicar satisfation. Nevertheless, the possibility of such an attack is a source of anxiety -- and counter-intelligence -- among the asari elite.



What are these asari elite worried about? If they follow the law they'll have no trouble. They worry is not that someone will get killed because some local law violates the Code, but to keep Justicars from cleaning up corruption in higher offices. In either case, the fact remains that new laws will emerge and the Code needs to consider this. Thus certain Oaths were adopted. For instance, if a justicar felt slavery was against the code Illium would run red with white collar blood (regardless of the fact that it is not a Republic world). So there is an oath that addresses this.

Given that this is not true for nearly all organizations in Human history, why should it be true for the Asari?

An organization does not need popular support to continue: it only needs not to be opposed in sufficient measure to rally its opponents. Cultural contexts and examples are endless, even in western history.

 

You're being too general. Justicars are state sanctioned, not some random group of people doing their own thing like a privately owned mercencary guild. The Power Rangers would be a organization without sanction. A guy who tried to arrest someone or interfere with a police investigation flashing a Power Ranger badge would be arrested themselves or escorted away.

A Justicar comparison: Would the NYPD would exist if the state and federal government did not want it to exist? No.

A non-justicar comparison: Could Blackwater Inc. exist without state or federal support? Yes.




Or if we had guys like the Punisher and Batman running around, we would have since formed a Justice League.


They'd be dead or in jail. Let's be serious for a moment, please.




And yes, toleration for groups that fall outside their own laws is a fact of life for societies and governments.


Examples please.

Do we let rastafarians smoke pot?
Do we let Mormon men marry more than one wife?
Do we allow honor killings?
We don't tolerate cultures whose practices violate out laws. Allowing people to associate themselves with mormonism, is not the same thing as tolerating mormonism as mormonism and polygamy go hand in hand.

Besides that no one on Noveria ever claimed it to be an Alliance world? Or that it even had exceptional ties to the Alliance?

The better argument would be that Noveria isn't a Citadel space. And it isn't, except in so much that Noveria is within Citadel space, populated by Citadel citizens, funded by Citadel corporations, provides exceptional priviliges and authorities to Citadel member officials, services Citadel governments and persons, and acknowledges the authority of the right-hand of the Citadel Council.


1. Noveria is not part of Citadel Space.
2. The citizenship of it corporate employees is irrelevant.
3. There is no such thing as a citadel corporation. There are corporations that have permission to operate within citadel space, but they do not belong to the citadel council.
4. Noveria has a special arrangement for the SPECTREs. And we saw first hand how they "acknowledge the authority of the right-hand of the Citadel Council".

Codex: Illium...

Illium is a classic garden world developed to serve as entrepôt between the Terminus Systems and the Asari Republics. To abet this trade the normally stringent customs laws of Council space on product-safety-proscribed materials and sapient trafficking are relaxed. Officially, Illium is not an asari world; it is colonized and operated by asari corporate interests. This gives it the same legal latitude enjoyed by the human corporate research enclaves of Noveria


Codex: Noveria...

[...]Noveria is technically not part of Citadel space and therefore exempt from Council law.
By special arrangement, Citadel Council Special Tactics and Reconnaissance agents have been granted extraterritorial privileges, but it remains to be seen how committed the Executive Board is to that principle.


Modifié par The Twilight God, 11 juillet 2011 - 02:38 .


#182
littlezack

littlezack
  • Members
  • 1 532 messages
Punisher and Batman aren't dead or in jail for the same reasons Samara's not in jail - they live in a fictional universe that allows for such things.

#183
Ryllen Laerth Kriel

Ryllen Laerth Kriel
  • Members
  • 3 001 messages
The Justicars will just end up sending Leliana after Shepard and Morinth. Leliana is destined to make bad cameos everywhere.

#184
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 083 messages

littlezack wrote...

Punisher and Batman aren't dead or in jail for the same reasons Samara's not in jail - they live in a fictional universe that allows for such things.


In our world such people would be dead or in jail. The DC or Marvel universes are irrelevent. Besides, Samara is not a vigilante. A more appropriate analogy for Samara is Judge Dread.

#185
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 083 messages

Ryllen Laerth Kriel wrote...

The Justicars will just end up sending Leliana after Shepard and Morinth. Leliana is destined to make bad cameos everywhere.


They'll probably send the Virmire Sacrifice to look for Shepard.

#186
BP20125810

BP20125810
  • Members
  • 508 messages
Morinth is able to imitate Samara. Anyway, Samara died in a Shady place. **** happens.

Modifié par BP20125810, 11 juillet 2011 - 03:43 .


#187
javierabegazo

javierabegazo
  • Members
  • 6 257 messages
Great posts The Twilight God

#188
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages
[quote]Dean_the_Young wrote...

[quote]The Twilight God wrote...

[quote]Dean_the_Young wrote...

The fact that the Code needed an addendum to specify that Justicars need to respect Asari common law should rather serve as evidence that the Code is not Asari law, but rather the codification of a private group. If the Justicars were the source or basis of Asari law, that wouldn't be necessary. Justicars are just a reflection of a group's interpretation of Asari law, plus the Code.[/quote]

More like the Code is the Asari Law and any local laws are additional. [/quote]No, it really is like that the Code binds Justicars, and the Asari laws are a different body of words.

[quote]
You leave out the fact that that assendum was put there because questionable politicians didn't want the law bitting them in the ass. They make a mistake, conscious or otherwise, and they are in trouble. [/quote]Nothing at all sugests it was questionable politicians, or any sort of unreasonable concerns.
[quote]

[quote] Codex: Justicars...

Justicars tend to be independent, requiring little help but also scorning it since such advanced skill and experience usually travels with a powerful ego. The conflicts presented by such arrogance prompted the Justicar Order to develop the Oaths of Subsumation. The oaths pledge protection of the innocent, the punishment of the guilty, and defence of common law and the norms of asari society. The effect of the Oaths is conservative, ensuring that justicars respect the existing distribution of asari power rather than staging a coup to rearrange society according to justicar satisfation. Nevertheless, the possibility of such an attack is a source of anxiety -- and counter-intelligence -- among the asari elite.[/quote]
[quote] Codex: Justicars...

Despite the refinement and sophistication of asari culture, criminality remains a fact of life. The asari solution to the most vicious and destructive criminal element is the Justicar Order.

[/quote]

Like I said, if the asari as a people did not support the Code there would be no justicars. [/quote]Given that this is not true for nearly all organizations in Human history, why should it be true for the Asari? 

An organization does not need popular support to continue: it only needs not to be opposed in sufficient measure to rally its opponents. Cultural contexts and examples are endless, even in western history.

[quote]
For instance, if we had guys like The Punisher or Batman running around they would be arrested because they fall outside the law. No one tolerates groups that fall outside their own laws.
[/quote]Or if we had guys like the Punisher and Batman running around, we would have since formed a Justice League.

And yes, toleration for groups that fall outside their own laws is a fact of life for societies and governments.


[quote]We don't even tolerate Mormon's right to practice polygamy. [/quote]Mormons don't have a right to practice polygamy*.

*In so much that, no, minorities claiming rights doesn't mean that such a right actually exists if it is not accepted by a wider culture.


[quote]
[quote]Dean_the_Young wrote...

As a self-created group without government sanction, the Justicars have only as much claim to be the purest representation of Asari law as any other group. That Asari culture tolerates them does not imply anything else but that the Asari culture tolerates them. [/quote]

You can't say that the Code is not asari law, but all the cops and civilians defer to a justicar's judgement without question. "Without government sanction" my ass. [/quote]You can say just that. The widespread reverence of the Justicars is a cultural phenomenum of the Asari, and even Asari officials are still culturally Asari. It's the same concept as to why authorities in super hero comics accept super heroes.
[quote]
[quote]Dean_the_Young wrote...

Illium is an Asari world as referred to by nearly all the Asari who live on it. The reason that Samara was a considerable risk wasn't because Illium was not an Asari world, but rather simply because Illium was a place non-Asari frequent.[/quote]

Illium is an asari world like Noveria is a human world. Noveria is not an Alliance world nomore than Illium is a Republic world. [/quote]Besides that no one on Noveria ever claimed it to be an Alliance world? Or that it even had exceptional ties to the Alliance?

The better argument would be that Noveria isn't a Citadel space. And it isn't, except in so much that Noveria is within Citadel space, populated by Citadel citizens, funded by Citadel corporations, provides exceptional priviliges and authorities to Citadel member officials, services Citadel governments and persons, and acknowledges the authority of the right-hand of the Citadel Council.

In a similar forms of policy, China wasn't fighting the US in Korea, Iran is not conducting a nuclear weapons program, NATO is not at war with Libya.

[/quote]What you are not understanding is that the code is an unchanging ideal of dealing with Justice that has to co-exsist with a body of constantly changing Law that also differ from onr place to another. The Justice is about order but based on the cerrent laws the location they are at abides by. The code is not Asari law but Justicar co-exsist with the law. If the law goes ageint them as imprisoning them for being justicars, then the law is not law full. In short, Justicar with always coexsist with Laws, as different and as changing as they maybe from place to place but if the law segregates them in anyway, the Justica has the right to go ageint the law because it unlawful.

#189
pablodurando

pablodurando
  • Members
  • 516 messages

The Twilight God wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

No, it really is like that the Code binds Justicars, and the Asari laws are a different body of words.


So if a cop is taking a handcuffed suspect in for questioning and a Justicar shows up starts interrogating the suspect. The suspect is being hostile and will not speak. Justicar kills her and says she saw her shoot a victim last month, but she got away at the time. The cop did not have any knowledge of this. What do you think will happen next?

The cop will accept that getting any further information out of the dead suspect will not occur, nod and go about their business.  They will accept the judgement, claims and actions of the justicar as fullfilment of the law. If any random citizen or even another cop did this they would be arrested and would be a full on investigation into her actions. Justicars are governement sanctioned extra-judicial enforcers similar to Judge Dread. 

Justicars and the Code are asari law. The Code is in effect everywhere in Asari space. Local laws are just local laws. It's not so much that The Code is the only laws they have, but the Justicars themselves do what they do legally under the law. I think you may be thinking I'm saying the Code is the totality of asari law and nothing else. I'm sure regular cops follow different procedures and are more accountable for their actions, but like the SPECTREs, the justicars are within their right to do what they do. The law is on their side.


No, the justicar code envelops the asari law but still follows the justicar interpretation of justice.  On Illium detective Anaya says that the she would be forced to arrest Samara because she murdered someone.  That wasn't part of the the asari law but Justicar code says any crime will not go unpunished.  The law is independent of the justicars as evidenced by Anaya arresting Samara even though she did her own version of justice.  In your example if the cop follows asari law then he should arrest the Justicar because she commited a crime.  Corruption is completely unrelated to the justicar situation. 

Given that this is not true for nearly all organizations in Human history, why should it be true for the Asari?

An organization does not need popular support to continue: it only needs not to be opposed in sufficient measure to rally its opponents. Cultural contexts and examples are endless, even in western history.

 

You're being too general. Justicars are state sanctioned, not some random group of people doing their own thing like a privately owned mercencary guild. The Power Rangers would be a organization without sanction. A guy who tried to arrest someone or interfere with a police investigation flashing a Power Ranger badge would be arrested themselves or escorted away.

A Justicar comparison: Would the NYPD would exist if the state and federal government did not want it to exist? No.

A non-justicar comparison: Could Blackwater Inc. exist without state or federal support? Yes.


I agree with your point here.



And yes, toleration for groups that fall outside their own laws is a fact of life for societies and governments.


Examples please.

Do we let rastafarians smoke pot?
Do we let Mormon men marry more than one wife?
Do we allow honor killings?
We don't tolerate cultures whose practices violate out laws. Allowing people to associate themselves with mormonism, is not the same thing as tolerating mormonism as mormonism and polygamy go hand in hand.


We tolerate religion, there's a major example.  We tolerate the KKK even though they publicly take credit for lynching of minorities and segregating all non-white races.  Toleration is everywhere.  Whether it is publicly supported or not is a different matter.  Look at the definition of tolerate.

#190
pablodurando

pablodurando
  • Members
  • 516 messages
double post

Modifié par pablodurando, 11 juillet 2011 - 04:32 .


#191
SkittlesKat96

SkittlesKat96
  • Members
  • 1 491 messages

Fidget6 wrote...

I don't think it will be a very big plot-point. I am curious to see how they fit Morinth into the story if you chose her over Samara though. They can't just have Samara's part in the story be completely replacable with Morinth like in ME2 because it's possible they both could have died.


Morinth is less important to the grand scale of things plus not many players would have chosen her over Samara (for their main games) so yeah she probably won't.

Maybe she'll be in one or two side quests or something, maybe you can choose to finally kill her cause I'd imagine that after she leaves the Normandy she'd probably have gone off killing people.

#192
atheelogos

atheelogos
  • Members
  • 4 554 messages
Saving Morinth really shouldn't have been an option. It's not even renegade. Its just evil.

#193
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

atheelogos wrote...

Saving Morinth really shouldn't have been an option. It's not even renegade. Its just evil.

It depends on your perspective. What's it to you if she kills or not. Is it the reason why she kills, or the way she kills. The same can be easily be said for her mother.

#194
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages
Nooooo.... Morinth kills to survive, but she also likes it and the ones she kills aren't criminals, but innocent civilians. Her mother doesn't like killing, but does it out of duty.

Taking Morith IS an evil choice.

#195
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

ThePwener wrote...

Nooooo.... Morinth kills to survive, but she also likes it and the ones she kills aren't criminals, but innocent civilians. Her mother doesn't like killing, but does it out of duty.

Taking Morith IS an evil choice.

So murder is ok if the person is criminal?

#196
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

ThePwener wrote...

Nooooo.... Morinth kills to survive, but she also likes it and the ones she kills aren't criminals, but innocent civilians. Her mother doesn't like killing, but does it out of duty.

Taking Morith IS an evil choice.

So murder is ok if the person is criminal?


Stop being dumb, you know it' not the same, it could never be the same. It isn't murder to kill someone who is trying to shoot at you, something cops do all the time. Are cops murderers because of it? No. I demand you stop saying dumb things.

#197
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

ThePwener wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

ThePwener wrote...

Nooooo.... Morinth kills to survive, but she also likes it and the ones she kills aren't criminals, but innocent civilians. Her mother doesn't like killing, but does it out of duty.

Taking Morith IS an evil choice.

So murder is ok if the person is criminal?


Stop being dumb, you know it' not the same, it could never be the same. It isn't murder to kill someone who is trying to shoot at you, something cops do all the time. Are cops murderers because of it? No. I demand you stop saying dumb things.

That merc that Samara killed after she broke her in half really could of  shot Samara anytime while she was all broken on the ground.
True, killing out of self defence and lack of compliance from an officer is one thing, but killing a criminal that already completly subjugated is another thing. The woman was down and out with no way to fight back. And Samara coldly kill her like an ant after the merc was taken down. That was like a cop killing a subject after they were tasered and out cold.

Modifié par dreman9999, 11 juillet 2011 - 11:06 .


#198
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages
No it wasn't. Wrex killed Fist after he was beaten, and nobody holds it against him. Not even Shepard. Thus, your argument is biased, you racist.

#199
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

ThePwener wrote...

No it wasn't. Wrex killed Fist after he was beaten, and nobody holds it against him. Not even Shepard. Thus, your argument is biased, you racist.

So, when you first meet Semara, she did not throw a Eclips merc through a glass window, walk up to that beaten pleading merc and placed her foot on that Mercs throat and crushed it?
The point is not where it's good or evil. It's relevence. Both Morith and Samara kill ruthlessly, who they kill is different, but they kill just as mercylessly. The point is persepective. Sure, Mornith was a serial killer but the consept of the Justicars are based and Asari law, which is in Asari space. Mornith want so much to do away the asari consept that she left to a place with no laws. Even if Mornith killed anyone, what group of law in Omaga would hold her to it?  Samara had as much athority to kill her daught in omega as Mornith had with Sed.
In the end murder is murder not matter the reason. And Samara is a murder, too.

Modifié par dreman9999, 11 juillet 2011 - 11:35 .


#200
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages
Pleading? The merc was making threats of death. Your obviously insane. Your argument attempts to protect a selfish serial killer. Hope you feel good about yourself.