Cyberwarren wrote...
Or Dragon Age 2.
Really? People are still saying stuff like this?
Cyberwarren wrote...
Or Dragon Age 2.
Modifié par Curunen, 12 juin 2011 - 12:52 .
Dannyboy9876 wrote...
Mass Effect 1 was awesome.
Mass Effect 2 was more awesome.
Mass Effect 3 will be even more awesome.
Varus Praetor wrote...
My favorite squad mates being relegated to a simple cameo, not being able to have a significant impact on events (*cough DA2 cough*), having BW complete the transformation and the last game in the trilogy to become a shooter rather than the hybrid RPG/shooter that ME2 tried to be.
Pursuit of the "CoD dollars" will be the death of BW as a AAA developer.
Dannyboy9876 wrote...
If you complain so much, you actually don't deserve to be heard. Why do whiners get such a loud voice, while the majority of the people who played these games and love them are largely ignored on these forums?
Bluko wrote...
Forums are for discussion. If you want a topic that's all about why ME3 will be Great! make one? Or should players only offer positive criticism? As great as the games have been, they aren't "perfect". There's plenty of room for improvment and the best way Bioware can make the game better is by finding out what players like and don't like. Right?
Rather than players being all like "BioWare will fail, they are lacking creativity, it'd be nicer to see "You guys should think about this, or do this, it would make it better." It's hard to know what to improve upon when people are stating that they lack creativity and their games are nonsensical.
Actually, I think I will make a thread. Not now, though, when some of the rage smoke has been cleared.
Are the moderators locking topics that say nice things about Mass Effect?
No, because nearly all threads on these forums are nitpicking, hardly any praise the games (except ME1 worshippers).
Or do you just think anything remotely negative should be locked right away? Kind of limits what can be discussed then.
It's just that some of these threads generate the least acceptable criticism. Accusing BioWare of lacking artistic creativity is the latest one. You can't disagree that some of these threads complaints are outright ridiculous.
C9316 wrote...
Things that would ruin ME3 huh? Let's see
Co-Op
Every LI being BI
Crappy DLC Outfit packs
Immersion breaking elements (ex: squadmates in catsuits in warzones)
Whyp_2 wrote...
Dannyboy9876 wrote...
Mass Effect 1 was awesome.
Mass Effect 2 was more awesome.
Mass Effect 3 will be even more awesome.
fix'd
zakahir wrote...
right, now for what would ruin it for me, the continuation of being more shooter then rpg,. maybe i'm one of the only ones who liked the inventory system, and the skill based shooting aspect. removing more rpg parts, it felt so constrained in mass effect 2, hell at least in mass effect one even if they didn't have a choice that was exactly what i wanted i had something close to it, in mass effect 2 there was multiple times that the answer i wanted was not on the screen and none of the choices were not even close to what i wanted
basically i'm tired of them alienating the core audience to try and get some of the fps fanboys who need to go back to bashing rocks on their heads because they don't have an iq high enough to understand the idiocy of doing that.
The JoeMan wrote...
Yeah. RPG fans are WAY smarter than shooter fans. Get over yourself.
i'd agree but then i'd just be a mass effect 1 fanboy and that would upset dannyboy...screw it, dang right.mortons4ck wrote...
Boring, linear level design.
Believe it or not, I enjoyed the ARRPEEJEE elements of Feros and Noveria. Getting the water up and running, breaking into synthetic insights, or getting the Mira's core primed may have been MacGuffins, but they made for a fairly interesting experience. I also liked how mini-sidequests broke up the action in the levels, instead of the "cutscene-convo-shooting gallery" copypasta they had for the majority of the second game. Honestly, most of the N7 missions had more going for them than the main missions.
I'd like to return to the ME1 school of thought on main-mission level design.
QFTfiendling wrote...
The JoeMan wrote...
Yeah. RPG fans are WAY smarter than shooter fans. Get over yourself.
You cannot be serious!
Bioware dumbed down the inventory and skill trees in ME 2 just to cater for the FPS market segment who complained that it was too complex in ME 1! Hell, even the dialogue options were dumbed down to an almost smiley face/frowny face level so that the minimum of thought was required from the gamer in between the action sequences.
What about these requested changes support your theory that FPS gamers have any need for cognition whatsoever? In case you are wondering where I am heading with this, there is a direct correlation between a need for cognition (thought) and intelligence.
There is usually a reason why people prefer not to think, it is the same reason very obese people don’t like running. They aren’t very good at it!
Modifié par Sarevok Synder, 12 juin 2011 - 01:48 .
Guest_Trust_*
Modifié par AwesomeEffect2, 12 juin 2011 - 02:19 .
C9316 wrote...
Things that would ruin ME3 huh? Let's see
Co-Op
Every LI being BI
Crappy DLC Outfit packs
Immersion breaking elements (ex: squadmates in catsuits in warzones)
Modifié par FluffyScarf, 12 juin 2011 - 02:03 .