Jzadek72 wrote...
They said I was mad! But I showed them! I showed them all.
Ahem.
I'm glad for confirmation, but I can't say I didn't expect this. Bioware aren't stupid.
*cough* DA2 *cough*
:innocent:
Jzadek72 wrote...
They said I was mad! But I showed them! I showed them all.
Ahem.
I'm glad for confirmation, but I can't say I didn't expect this. Bioware aren't stupid.
Brenon Holmes wrote...
Change our stance?
I only mention this because the idea that lots of posts can amount to a specific change in the game is kind of dangerous. It's far more likely that insightful, thoughtful posts will result in direct change.
I know for myself, I'm far more likely to pay attention to thoughtful, civil discussion than to... alternatives. :happy:
Brenon Holmes wrote...
If you know that 30% of the total playerbase did one thing and seemed to enjoy one particular thing... but a group on the forums is saying they don't like that... which is more important? Is there a way to compromise so that we can deliver something that we think everyone will like?
It's a hard decision... and thankfully one that I don't usually have to make. :happy:
Thanks for such candid answers and insight into the way you look at game data analysis and customer interaction on these forums, even though most will put more effort into misunderstanding it than treating it for what it is.Brenon Holmes wrote...
Yep, it's easy to know (from data) that someone did something. Knowing *why* they did it is incredibly difficult. If we need to know that's when we start looking at forums, play/focus tests, personal experience... etc.
Modifié par nexworks, 12 juin 2011 - 08:05 .
onelifecrisis wrote...
DocLasty wrote...
"Bioware are, by their own admission and in their own words, focused on getting a larger audience. They're not interested in "insightful" or "thoughtful" fans, they're interested in getting MOAR fans. I believe that, contrary to Brenan's claim, a large loud outcry from the fanbase here will carry more weight than a small, thoughtful, insightful one. This forum may only represent 1% of the fans, but if 90% of that 1% all agree on something then that is s
statistically relevent."
Tell me - what are you more likely to listen to? Ten people talking to you in a polite, thoughtful manner, or 100 people screaming like whiney, spoiled children?
If I want to "broaden my audience" or whatever, I'll listen to the 100 screamers.
bobobo878 wrote...
hmm so much for zero suit ashley than.
iakus wrote...
My faith is halfway restored.
It's great to hear about helmets being back. And I'm trusting they are sealable helmets too.
Now we just have to see who's definition of "armor" is being used...
Modifié par Schneidend, 12 juin 2011 - 09:04 .
Damn straight!Avian005 wrote...
See, I thought that was her "off-duty" suit. Or at least, it better be.
Spaghetti_Ninja wrote...
Ah yes, Ashley. An optional squadmate, alledgedly back in ME3 for more boring poety and angsty daddy-issues.
We have dismissed those claims.
SalsaDMA wrote...
Brenon Holmes wrote...
Change our stance?
I only mention this because the idea that lots of posts can amount to a specific change in the game is kind of dangerous. It's far more likely that insightful, thoughtful posts will result in direct change.
I know for myself, I'm far more likely to pay attention to thoughtful, civil discussion than to... alternatives. :happy:
The biggot parade getting their way while they were spewing hate on anyone that disagreed with them to the point that people just gave up trying to discuss things with them, certainly got quite a few of us to think otherwise about the point you just stated. Just saying...
Schneidend wrote...
In context it is pretty clear. Casey was referring to something different than what we have now, the suit/light armor we've seen Ashley wearing. There's really only room to go heavier from there. That's your answer.
Wulfram wrote...
Schneidend wrote...
In context it is pretty clear. Casey was referring to something different than what we have now, the suit/light armor we've seen Ashley wearing. There's really only room to go heavier from there. That's your answer.
Chainmail bikini?
ElitePinecone wrote...
Tweet from Casey Hudson a few minutes ago:
"Ashley will be able to have armor and a helmet in #ME3, as will others. We've only shown very little of the game so far."
