^ That is full of win xDS3Plan wrote...
I love this.
*snip*
link
It made me grin like an idiot. [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/happy.png[/smilie]
Modifié par Systemlord Baal, 30 juin 2012 - 06:51 .
adneate wrote...
I came up there to accept the Reaper's unconditional surrender, not to offer the surrender of the galaxy and if I don't get my surrender I've got a big goddamn bomb to set off.
Modifié par doozer12, 30 juin 2012 - 06:53 .
S3Plan wrote...
I love this.
*snip*
It made me grin like an idiot. :happy:
Modifié par MidnightRaith, 30 juin 2012 - 06:55 .
S3Plan wrote...
I love this.
link
It made me grin like an idiot. :happy:

Modifié par noxiuniversitas1, 30 juin 2012 - 07:06 .
Guest_frudi_*
Modifié par frudi, 30 juin 2012 - 07:10 .
noxiuniversitas1 wrote...
Re: ending choices... it's pretty clear it's gonna be an "agree to disagree" thing... much likewhether or not Liara could fall for a renegade Shep... what?!
frudi wrote...
Well, I don't see Reject as Shepard consciously condemning the entire galaxy to gruesome death. As I said before, from her perspective, there is still hope the Reapers can be stopped. And how many of you saved the Destiny Ascension in ME1, knowing that doing so increases the chances of Sovereign succeeding? How many destroyed the Collector base, knowing the tech there could be invaluable to stopping the Reapers? There was as much at stake in those decisions as when choosing to reject the Catalyst.
And there is one crucial factor, one that I haven't even properly considered before my previous post. We now know that the Catalyst controls the Reapers, we know that he's an AI and that he resides on the Citadel. This knowledge is a complete game-changer! There is now no need to take on the Reapers themselves, the Catalyst is their Achilles' heel; we only have to get to him - destroy him, hack him, reprogramme him, whatever. There's our unconventional victory right there.
lillitheris wrote...
No! There are objective facts at play. Everyone’s entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts!noxiuniversitas1 wrote...
Re: ending choices... it's pretty clear it's gonna be an "agree to disagree" thing... much likewhether or not Liara could fall for a renegade Shep... what?!
Modifié par noxiuniversitas1, 30 juin 2012 - 07:20 .
Guest_frudi_*
Actually, if you don't believe the Catalyst anyway, than why do you believe that shooting the red tube is the way to detonate the big-ass warhead? Maybe the real way to detonate it is back at the console he dragged you away from, hoping to distract you until his minions can destroy the Crucible. So yeah, you still have a lot to lose by going along with him...adneate wrote...
You have no reason to believe that stupid kid and yet nothing to lose if you try to detonate the mother of all nuclear warheads.
frudi wrote...
Well, I don't see Reject as Shepard consciously condemning the entire galaxy to gruesome death. As I said before, from her perspective, there is still hope the Reapers can be stopped.
And there is one crucial factor, one that I mentioned but haven't really properly considered before my previous post. We now know that the Catalyst controls the Reapers, we know that he's an AI and that he resides on the Citadel. This knowledge is a complete game-changer! There is now no need to take on the Reapers themselves, the Catalyst is their Achilles' heel; we only have to get to him - destroy him, hack him, reprogramme him, whatever. There's our unconventional victory right there.
Modifié par lillitheris, 30 juin 2012 - 07:22 .
CrazyGreggy wrote...
As far as Reject goes, it's a bollocks ending that fits perfectly....as a shining example of the godawful writing that leaked out of the collective Walters/Hudson orifice.
Here's the blueprints that have been tweaked, nudged, noodled with and modified by the races of countless cycles, an archaeological techno-chinese whispers if you will. The only realistic outcome of building the damn thing is "press the button and see what it does". So you get to the Crucible chamber and find that there's actually THREE buttons, but none of them are going to do what you wanted them to. Well maybe you should've designed and built your own damn doomsday device, say the writers. Oh wait, you couldn't cos we didn't give you that choice.
So you take your "wtf does this do" machine, and you choose blue/green/red. It makes perfect sense from within the confines of the moronic way they ditched Drew's original idea that had been trailed in ME2 and tried to kitbash together something that they could shoehorn starbrat into.
gg no re.
Guest_frudi_*
You're using meta-gaming knowledge about the consequences of those two choices (saving the DA and destroying the Collector base). Even just the fact that this was the first/second game in the trilogy is enough to conclude that the ultimate fate of the galaxy is not going to rest on these decisions.MidnightRaith wrote...
frudi wrote...
Well, I don't see Reject as Shepard consciously condemning the entire galaxy to gruesome death. As I said before, from her perspective, there is still hope the Reapers can be stopped. And how many of you saved the Destiny Ascension in ME1, knowing that doing so increases the chances of Sovereign succeeding? How many destroyed the Collector base, knowing the tech there could be invaluable to stopping the Reapers? There was as much at stake in those decisions as when choosing to reject the Catalyst.
And there is one crucial factor, one that I haven't even properly considered before my previous post. We now know that the Catalyst controls the Reapers, we know that he's an AI and that he resides on the Citadel. This knowledge is a complete game-changer! There is now no need to take on the Reapers themselves, the Catalyst is their Achilles' heel; we only have to get to him - destroy him, hack him, reprogramme him, whatever. There's our unconventional victory right there.
I disagree about those choices being as heavy as deciding the fate of the entire galaxy. The Council can and does get replaced and the Collector base was never touted as something that could hold the answers to the Reapers destruction. It would give us an advantage, but I suspected that advantage would be minimal at best and I destroyed it. Turns out I was right anyway come ME3. Rather have blown it sky high than let TIM have it.... However, the ending choices are too critical to take the chance that the fleet can miraculously destroy the Reapers. Shepard should know that the risk may just be too high or just not pay out at all, as it turns out to be.
I don't see how you can sabotage the Starchild. No one is coming up that beam after Shepard, I don't think. We don't have any heavy weapons with us, only a pistol and Shepard may not be an engineer or infiltrator so no tech skill to hack the Brat if that's even possible. Then, there's the matter of Shepard being horribly wounded already and may not have the lucidness required to hack the Starkid.
Hmm I wonder if there's any weird AU fanfic of Liara choosing Control and about how she goes around being a Reaper overlord?coatsworth wrote...
What Would Liara Do?
We just need more of those turian ships that can shoot off their legs with one shot.Aristobulus500 wrote...
Except for, you know, all the other times we defeated Reapers conventionally.
Oh and the time a worm with no technology at all to aid it defeated a Reaper.
Modifié par Arcataye, 30 juin 2012 - 07:36 .
frudi wrote...
From a role-playing perspective, you're risking the lives of the entire galaxy for your naive paragon ideals. It's not about the council at all, those ships we throw at the Geth to save Destiny Ascension might be crucial to stopping Sovereign in time, before he opens the relay and all the Reapers from dark space come flooding in. And it's similar with the Collector base - there are mountains of information and technology in there, even the remains of a new Reaper; there's no guarantee we'll find the key to defeating the Reapers in there, but there is a chance, a chance you're again throwing away for nothing more than your ideals.
frudi wrote...
And how many of you saved the Destiny Ascension in ME1, knowing that doing so increases the chances of Sovereign succeeding? How many destroyed the Collector base, knowing the tech there could be invaluable to stopping the Reapers?
Modifié par doozer12, 30 juin 2012 - 09:12 .
Guest_frudi_*
And I was killing billions every time I got sidetracked for a few weeks to track down the Grand ****** of Athame (credit to Rae for the phrase) and the rest of the Stupid Artefacts of the Galaxy Collection. And again when I responded to every damn distress signal from random facilities around the galaxy. And I was OK with that, just as everyone else, because it was the right thing to do.lillitheris wrote...
frudi wrote...
Well, I don't see Reject as Shepard consciously condemning the entire galaxy to gruesome death. As I said before, from her perspective, there is still hope the Reapers can be stopped.
It will still kill billions or trillions. Even if you win. There’s a good chance you’re killing Liara and everyone else with that decision.
Sure, there's no way to know how the Reapers will respond if the Catalyst is destroyed. But if he is hacked or reprogrammed to for instance order them to FTL into the Sun? There's the real potential of this solution, getting the Catalyst to destroy the Reapers for us.lillitheris wrote...
And there is one crucial factor, one that I mentioned but haven't really properly considered before my previous post. We now know that the Catalyst controls the Reapers, we know that he's an AI and that he resides on the Citadel. This knowledge is a complete game-changer! There is now no need to take on the Reapers themselves, the Catalyst is their Achilles' heel; we only have to get to him - destroy him, hack him, reprogramme him, whatever. There's our unconventional victory right there.
…There’s really no proof for this assertion. Interesting idea, but it’s far from concrete. For all we know, the Reapers might keep doing exactly what they are doing now.


Modifié par noxiuniversitas1, 30 juin 2012 - 07:53 .
Modifié par doozer12, 30 juin 2012 - 07:53 .

Modifié par noxiuniversitas1, 30 juin 2012 - 08:03 .
doozer12 wrote...
AIght back to Liara for the upcoming 1700 page.
Top 10 Liara quotes so far (or related to, comic book references are accepted) and favorite screenshot (from any of the three games). Begin!



Modifié par TheDonk95, 30 juin 2012 - 08:13 .