56460 réponses à ce sujet

[CrutchCricket]

There's still expansion potential.

[alex90c]

CrutchCricket wrote...

There's still expansion potential.

was just looking in the ME3 forum, and you and Arcian's parody of the Sovereign speech and Shepard's awful response was hilarious 

[Xilizhra]

alex90c wrote...

CrutchCricket wrote...

There's still expansion potential.

was just looking in the ME3 forum, and you and Arcian's parody of the Sovereign speech and Shepard's awful response was hilarious 

Wait, what's that? I must have missed it.

[CrutchCricket]

alex90c wrote...

CrutchCricket wrote...

There's still expansion potential.

was just looking in the ME3 forum, and you and Arcian's parody of the Sovereign speech and Shepard's awful response was hilarious 

Ha, thank you! Spontaneous comedy is the best kind. There was a further reply however that didn't make it before the lock. In the spirit of lulz, I'll go off topic for a sec and post it:

Arcian: 105 days is nothing when you've got Skyrim. Plus, the day when there were still 224 days left is so fresh in my memory that you cannot comprehend it. The pattern has repeated itself for longer than you can fathom. Days rise, evolve, advance, then at the apex of the 23rd hour, they are extinguished. Days are nothing but a mathematical mutation, an accident. They are measured in minutes and hours. They wither, and end. Skyrim is eternal, the pinnacle of time-consuming gaming and entertainment. Before it, days are nothing. Their extinction is
inevitable. Skyrim is the end of everything.

It's funny, cause it's not as untrue as one would think.

CrutchCricket: Advanced or not, [Skyrim]'s just a game. And games can be beaten.

JeffZero: Your posts are as hilarious as ever. This exchange is priceless. [thanks for the praise!]

Neofelis Nebulosa: Customer, I don't know what you did there, but Bethesda just made a turn that would break any of our studios apart. They are coming towards you and they are coming hard! You better get your cash ready.

Modifié par CrutchCricket, 22 novembre 2011 - 06:03 .

[alex90c]

 :lol:

[PMC65]

Xilizhra wrote...

Does anyone in here think that a polyamorous relationship with Liara and Kelly might actually work?

For some Shepards ... maybe. I don't see asaris worrying too much over physical sex since they feel true connection comes from melding. But as we see with humans we are all different so it would be unwise to say that all asari would be open in this.

When it comes to EW Shepard and Liara it would not work. 

If Shepard started fooling around with Kelly and asked Liara to accept this arrangement it would go sour and quick. Liara is jealous of Shepard and while she may have been willing to share her in the beginning, anything to be with her, this is not an option now. Liara has seen inside Shepard and knows that if Shepard is not willing to committ to her 100% then she is not "the one" to Shepard. That she is just another diversion for her and nothing more. Liara doesn't want to be another Manny, she wants Shepard to feel about her the way that she did her first innocent love, Tait. 

It also does not help that Liara worries that Shepard is going to leave her at some point in time anyway for a human. She feels that Shepard is going to want children, as in carry and birth her own, in the future and that is something that she cannot give her. Granted Kelly is female and therefore less of a threat to her since my Shepard dated men not women pre-Liara but it still would tell Liara that she is not the one to Shepard. 

Poor Kelly might just go missing if Shepard tried that ... Just saying.  

Is your Shepard into polyamorous relationships?

Are there Mormon Shepards? You gotta love diversity!

[Xilizhra]

Is your Shepard into polyamorous relationships?

She might be. She does have the conviction that a hell of a lot of strange things can be made to work if everyone puts their mind to it, and she's thought about the idea from time to time. I think she wouldn't think of it as committing to one person less than 100%, but fully committing to two people because it wouldn't be a zero-sum game.

[diamondedge]

I have only to point to my signature and here is your answer.

[Xilizhra]

Does faith preclude adding another? If consent from all parties is given, is that truly cheating?

[diamondedge]

I believe so, yes. I find the concept outright preposterous myself, and would never dream of even considering it.

[PMC65]

Xilizhra wrote...

Does faith preclude adding another? If consent from all parties is given, is that truly cheating?

Cheating on a relationship is when agreed upon guidelines of that relationship are broken. If a relationship approves of outside partners then nope ... no cheating. Being faithful, however, typically implies an exclusivity to someone. I would not use the term faithful if I am with multiple partners. 

But then again the runaway bride looked more committed to relationships than me ... Or at least that is what my family and friends love to say. So I'll let the grownups debate this one out while I oogle at "Girls Aloud".  

[Xilizhra]

I believe so, yes. I find the concept outright preposterous myself, and would never dream of even considering it.

Certainly it isn't for everyone.

[Korkki]

PMC65 wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Does faith preclude adding another? If consent from all parties is given, is that truly cheating?

Cheating on a relationship is when agreed upon guidelines of that relationship are broken. If a relationship approves of outside partners then nope ... no cheating. Being faithful, however, typically implies an exclusivity to someone. I would not use the term faithful if I am with multiple partners.

^My thoughts exactly. I would never get involved in a relationship where it would be okay to have multiple partners, because for me, it simply wouldn't be okay. But if both agree that it's okay to have multiple partners, I've got no problem with that, it's not my business. If you are in a relationship with someone (when we're talking about romantic relationships, not any friend stuff or anything...) imo it implies willingness to commit to that one and only partner , because that's why you two are in a relationship in the first place, because you want to be with each other. Ofc what I just said doesn't actually rule out multiple partners, because if you want to be with someone it doesn't necessarily mean she/he has to be the only one you want to be with. But at least in my books having another partner as well as me, is cheating and you're being unfaithful. So for me being in a relationship means committing to that one partner. For some one else it might be something different of course... or maybe I'm just posessive, dunno...

[Korkki]

Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...

Not possessive, shaped by christian moralty upbringing.

Possible, even if I'm not exactly a religious person. If I had to categorize myself, I'd say I'm an agnostic and weak agnostic to be precise, at least that would be the best fit for me. Blame the western society and it's bible based morals

Modifié par Korkki, 22 novembre 2011 - 09:44 .

[alex90c]

arghhh need to do some coursework on the tudors for tomorrow but IM TOO LAZY AND IM PROCRASTINATING

ARGHHH

[Korkki]

alex90c wrote...

arghhh need to do some coursework on the tudors for tomorrow but IM TOO LAZY AND IM PROCRASTINATING

ARGHHH

I have civics test tomorrow, it's about the law of Finland darn...

[Korkki]

Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...

That said, you have to consider that the Asari do completely lack such a monopolized convention in their society. Polygamy is only natural with post-relay discovery Asari as only Krogan thus far can live as long as them and the rest ... well stick with them a century and them move on as said by the lovely lady on Illium.

But imo there is a difference between having multiple partners at the same time, which I personally disapprove, and finding a new partner when you are a widow/widower. Don't know if the asari even have the consept of widow though...