Lizardviking wrote...
Sunnie22 wrote...
How do you determine a good from bad ending? I've seen all the source video for all the good/bad endings, theres not a lot of difference between them. They were all bad endings, but I feel the least bad was the destroy the Reapers end. In any of the chices though, if you didn;t have enough asset points, the earth get toasted, which is the only real difference.Lizardviking wrote...
jlb524 wrote...
The vid doesn't really debunk Indoctrination theory since Shepard could have been on the Citadel and got indoctrinated there.
If the indoctrination theory is true. Then why does the catalyst only provide the destruction option for Shepard in the bad ending?
The worst ending is the version of destroy where the energy wave kills both organics and the Reapers. There is also the part wher Harbinger kills Shepard's squadmates as well if you have a low amount of war assest (not sure if there are more throughout the London battle).
I thought that part where Harbinger kills your 2 squadmembers was cut from the game, at least that's what it said as a title for the vid on youtube. Are you sure it's still in the released game version?
I don't think even they know, they are clearly in a state of total shock that these endings were rejected. At this point nobody can predict what they'll do anymore then they can stick their tongue out the window and predict the barometric pressure 3 weeks from now. The most they've concretely said is they're going to do something, probably.
And I'm still having trouble believing this. The current ending is so full of plot holes, things that go completely against the lore and space magic that I do not believe BioWare could even think the fans would accept this ending, not after all the promises they made. I'm very conflicted in this matter...
Modifié par Robhuzz, 23 mars 2012 - 08:48 .





Retour en haut








