SCM003 wrote...
Jimmy Fury wrote...
SCM003 wrote...
That just reeks of pandering to a group that may be a vocal majority on the BSN but a minority in actuality.
Realism argument and you said pandering.
[drinks twice]
WOO! now it's a party.
I love it how people on BSN only pull out "sound bites" and as a result, completely misrepresent the whole statement presented. Why don't you post the paragraph I wrote after that as well? Oh, wait. Because it states how I am actually in support of s/s romances, and heaven forbid someone actually have a complex view of the situation.
First, congrats on the sense of humor removal. I hear thats a risky procedure but yours seems to have gone swimmingly.
Second your view really isn't that complex.
"I'm ok with s/s relationships as long as it's none of the characters I like." is pretty clear cut. It also isn't new.
I mean dressing it up as support with the old "No but really I think you should totally get your own character. Just leave mine alone. Because they're mine." and then topping it off with a downright ironic "mary sue" accusation was a nice twist but at the end of the day... you still said pandering.