Aller au contenu

Photo

♂♂ • ♀♀ For The Love — The Same-Sex Romance Discussion Thread **may contain spoilers**


25715 réponses à ce sujet

#7226
demonic_cookie

demonic_cookie
  • Members
  • 285 messages
gtmanwe, I like your suggestion in principle (more acts of intimacy through the romance), but your examples just make me giggle, because I have an image of Jack giving my Soldier!fShep flowers and skipping around the presidium singing songs.

I am more of a touching person myself. I would rather have a hug or a kiss or a make-out session rather than romantic dedications of songs. Or, well, the LI comes to comfort you after a heavy loss (you can bet there will be a lot of those). Or brings you coffee. Anything but flowers >_< Maybe Liara, if she suddenly started reading human romance novels to educate herself on the intricacies of human romance.

It's part of the whole "Asari aren't female" thing. Those are the guns bioware is sticking too.

Are they though? I guess I'm forever doomed to be disappointed by people's lack of brains, but asari as said to be female in the codex...

I guess it's silly of me to expect an even 2/2 (or 3/3) split, but I really do. I really hope they won't drop the ball this badly, and even if I don't get another new f/f interest out of it, it will finally shut up those people who keep repeating that femShep/Liara is not a lesbian romance. Bioware counted it as lesbian, suck it! But, ah >_< I expect to be let down by the ME team on the s/s part, just as I expect to be wowed by the Dragon Age team.

#7227
Abispa

Abispa
  • Members
  • 3 465 messages
@ demonic_cookie -- I think Bioware's Asari stupidity is that they're FEMALE, but since they're mono-gendered it really isn't a same sex relationship if Shepard is a woman.

Modifié par Abispa, 28 juillet 2011 - 02:56 .


#7228
_Sylar_

_Sylar_
  • Members
  • 71 messages

Abispa wrote...

@ demonic_cookie -- I think Bioware's Asari stupidity is that they're FEMALE, but since they're mono-gendered it really isn't a same sex relationship if Shepard is a woman.


Hmmm but what about the lil details that asari act like?I mean if they weren't female,wouldn't they act a little more manly...and as far as I've seen all of them speak loudly "we are female"...even in the romance with Liara....she speaks like a woman,acts like a woman..her body language is womanly..so eh...don't know what else to add here,but you get my point :D Long story short their body language speaks of them as females so it counts as a lesbian romance!Lol!

#7229
Guest_Nyoka_*

Guest_Nyoka_*
  • Guests

KawaiiKatie wrote...

That's one way to write a video game, but that's not Mass Effect. Characters already react different to male versus female Shepard, and I hope that they do so when it comes to Shepard's sexuality.

Aside from jerks like Harkin, no, they don't. The conversations are for the most part exactly the same. The only thing that was different was the availability of romances, and that's the thing we're trying to get rid of.

I'm not asking for two radically different romances where Kaidan bares his soul to male Shepard but had casual sex with female Shepard. I'm asking for romances that have unique dialogue based on the fact that one is a homosexual relationship, and the other is heterosexual.

The general point is: why that kind of segregation? Do you think it is impossible to write one good romance for everyone? That hypothetical general romance would be so bad that players who don't like their sex-assigned romance being forced to play another character, like you had to in ME1, would be worth it? What if you find the ME3 homosexual Kaidance awful (much shorter than the hetero one, or maybe full of stereotypes or whatever other reason) and have to play Femshep again to be able to experience a decent romance with him? Simply by being different, people will like one better than the other. And some of those people will be of the wrong sex. What do you say to them?

There's no need for that. We can have aknowledgment without segregating people. We had it in the ME1 liaramance.

To use your Jack example, if Jack is made bisexual in ME3, there should be unique dialogue for female Shepards versus male Shepards. For female Shepard, Jack should be able to discuss her previous "I'm not a 'girl's club' kind of person" comment, and her seemingly casual sexual history with women. For a male Shepard who did not romance Jack in ME2, Jack should be able to discuss why male Shepard did or did not take advantage of her, or why it took him so long to finally express and interest in her, when she brought it up several times.

Different priorities I guess. To me those are negligible details that should be dealt with in a couple "Investigate" lines. The point of the Jackmance in my opinion is the Good Will Hunting routine: Jack's initial, violent barrier that you get to go through. Their personalities are the point of it.


The relationship between Jack and Shepard is already different based on Shepard's gender, and ME3 should reflect this. The same goes for Kaidan.

Yes, because they are romances reserved for one particular sex right now. I'd like those romances to be available to everyone, so everyone has the same experience, like what they already have in the rest of the game (again, aside from the occasional jerk).

The fact that Kaidan and male Shepard already have a very different relationship than that of Kaidan and female Shepard (even if female Shepard did not romance him) should mean that, if Kaidan is bisexual, his romance in ME3 should have two variants based on Shepard's gender.

No, single Femshep and Manshep don't have a very different relationship with Kaidan. Their relationship isn't different at all. Even if they were, if you play Manshep, what do you care what Kaidan feels towards my femshep anyway? He won't talk about that in your game, that's for sure. He didn't talk about that in your ME1 playthroughs, either. For all you know, he's gay. That's all that should matter to you. (this is the same point you make at the end of your post; this response works for that as well. Just to make this post shorter.)

Anyway, let's say it's all true for the sake fo the argument. That difference you think it's so different that it deserves a whole different romance can be dealth with by changing one single sentence. In ME1, Kaidan said "when you put it that way, there's no reason why they shouldn't like you--err, I mean us. Humans". So yeah, he is interested in Femshep. Now, in ME3, if you're Manshep, he can pull a Garrus on you and say "you mean... well, I hadn't thought about it, yadda yadda, I need time"; if you're Femshep, he can say: "you mean... well, I kinda thought about it but that was a long time ago, yadda yadda, I need time". That's all. That's acknowledgment right there in a natural way. Not a big deal. Why the fact that Shep is a man deserves more "honour", I definitely don't understand. I don't think my modded Ashmance deserves more honour (whatever that means) than the standard one. My aspiration is normality.

Kaidan should definitely have two distinct experiences that honours and acknowledges the different relationship that he has with male Shepard as compared to female Shepard.

At the expense of the players. Sorry, I don't see why. And I don't see why because I don't understand why you think homosexual couples are inherently different from heterosexual couples. Maybe you can explain that one to me.

Modifié par Nyoka, 28 juillet 2011 - 03:26 .


#7230
TheMarshal

TheMarshal
  • Members
  • 2 339 messages

Abispa wrote...

@ demonic_cookie -- I think Bioware's Asari stupidity is that they're FEMALE, but since they're mono-gendered it really isn't a same sex relationship if Shepard is a woman.


I'm pretty sure that's just a marketing line they used to cover up the "OMG LESBIAN SEX SIMULATOR!!!" hullaballoo that FoxNews raised several years back.

#7231
_Sylar_

_Sylar_
  • Members
  • 71 messages

Augoeides wrote...

_Sylar_ wrote...

AngelicMachinery wrote...

demonic_cookie wrote...

.With Vega on the run and that new "Vigilante"/or something/->I'm guessing that they would be the ones for the s/s romances.

But that would still leave the f/f side of the fence one romance up. Liara is already in the game, so if they do bring a new human LI into the game they have to have 2 male s/s LIs.


It's part of the whole "Asari aren't female" thing.  Those are the guns bioware is sticking too.


Lol now that you say it like this :whistle: it makes sense.Why?Well here is how I see things...in ME1 Kaidan->FemShep/Ash->ManShep and Liara for both.Now that they bring the s/s romances I guess it would be the same pattern...like this Vega->ManShep/Vigilante->FemShep and maybe again Liara for both..if you haven't romanced her yet?

@demonic_cookie
I see that it would be fair if there were 2/2 for both Man/Fem Sheps,but as you can see in ME1that distinction wasn't exactly fair for some of the players...and who said it would be again in ME3...really im only guessing and I hope that the game will succeed in everyones expectations,but till then...


or maybe in ME3:
Kaidan-> FemShep+MShep/Ash -> MShep+FemShep
AND
Vega-> MShep/Vigilante->FemShep
AND
Liara for both
AND
Male alien for both

Wishful thinking? Totally. xD


Lol lol lol! In this case I guess the Normandy has to have a reconstruction for a lot of new bedrooms... :happy::D

#7232
demonic_cookie

demonic_cookie
  • Members
  • 285 messages
Nyoka, I find the way you equate the sort of alienation gay PCs experienced during ME to the kind of 'alienation' a heterosexual PC experiences when their version of the romance doesn't have the same lines as a gay one disturbing. Do you really think these are equal?

#7233
Jimmy Fury

Jimmy Fury
  • Members
  • 1 486 messages

Nyoka wrote...
Now, in ME3, if you're Manshep, he can pull a Garrus on you and say "you mean... well, I hadn't thought about it, yadda yadda, I need time"; if you're Femshep, he can say: "you mean... well, I kinda thought about it but that was a long time ago, yadda yadda, I need time". That's all. That's acknowledgment right there in a natural way.

Just to go on record here real quick...
Those two slight variations are what i meant with  "I never said 'utterly identical' I said the same."
There's a small difference in the words themselves but the sentiment, the emotion, and the depth are the same. Two versions of the romance where the differences are that insignificant would be the same to me.

#7234
KawaiiKatie

KawaiiKatie
  • Members
  • 1 810 messages

Nyoka wrote...

Aside from jerks like Harkin, no, they don't. The conversations are for the most part exactly the same. The only thing that was different was the availability of romances, and that's the thing we're trying to get rid of.


You'd like to take away what little distinction there is between playing male and female Shepard and make them completely identical except for pronouns? Yeah, that's not what Bioware games strive to do. There's gender equality, yes, but some people in the Mass Effect do (and will always) react to Shepard different because of his/her gender. I don't know why you think "different" has to equal bad.

The general point is: why that kind of segregation?


The segregation of male and female Shepard as distinct experiences is already in the game. If you think that the writers are suddenly going to make female and male Shepard identical-except-for-pronouns in ME3, you're mistaken. I just want that distinction to also apply to bisexual romances.

What if you find the ME3 homosexual Kaidance awful (much shorter than the hetero one, or maybe full of stereotypes or whatever other reason) and have to play Femshep again to be able to experience a decent romance with him? Simply by being different, people will like one better than the other.


Again, I don't know why you assume that different equals bad. I don't know why the homosexual romances between Kaidan and manShep would be "shorter" or somehow less satisfying that the heterosexual romance between Kaidan and femShep. Again, I'm not asking for something radically different, but the foundation of Kaidan and male Shepard's relationship is already different than that of female Shepard and Kaidan, and this should be explored in ME3.

No, single Femshep and Manshep don't have a very different relationship with Kaidan. Their relationship isn't different at all. Even if they were, if you play Manshep, what do you care what Kaidan feels towards my femshep anyway?


Yes, they are. Kaidan flirts with female Shepard in Mass Effect 1 after she saves him from the Prothean Beacon. My male Shepard might not care what Kaidan did with female Shepard in a different game, but Kaidan should certainly care! In Mass Effect 3, if female Shepard is single and suddenly starts returning his advances, he should have dialogue that respects the relationship they started in ME1--a relationship that is inherently different than that of male Shepard and Kaidan, because male Shepard saved Ashley from the Prothean Beacon, and he was never able to flirt with Kaidan at all. Male Shepard and Kaidan were robbed of certain plot-points granted to female Shepard and Kaidan, even if she never chose to start a relationship with him. Even if female Shepard only talks to Kaidan, he still makes casual passes as her and expresses an interest in her, something he never does with male Shepard.

And because Kaidan will be (or should be) aware of how he treated female Shepard as distinct from male Shepard in ME1, his romance with them in ME3 should also be distinct.


Kaidan should definitely have two distinct experiences that honours and acknowledges the different relationship that he has with male Shepard as compared to female Shepard.


At the expense of the players. Sorry, I don't see why. And I don't see why because I don't understand why you think homosexual couples are inherently different from heterosexual couples. Maybe you can explain that one to me.


Again, I don't know why respecting the existing difference between Kaidan's relationship with male Shepard and female Shepard is at the player's "expense." If anything, taking away how Kaidan treated female Shepard (again, even if she didn't romance him) in ME1 and making it identical to male Shepard is what will take away from the players.

And, yes, homosexual and heterosexual couples are inherently different. I know that I would certainly enter a relationship with a woman very differently than I would with a man. You may not feel that way--in fact, a lot of "gender blind" people don't feel that way--but I'm sure that Kaidan does. The fact that his relationship with male and female Shepard are already different means that they should have different plot elements in ME3.



Edit on my last point: I didn't mean to get into gender politics, I only meant to imply that, yes, some people treat homosexual and heterosexual relationships differently, even bisexuals, and I'm sure that Kaidna is one of them, seeing that he flirted with female Shepard in ME1 but not male Shepard. No, male Shepard would not be aware how Kaidan reacted to femShep in a different game, but Kaidan would certainly be aware of how he acted around femShep in femShep's game. For him to act like his flirtations with femShep in ME1 never happened would be a detriment to his character, and the evotion of his and femShep's relationship. Therefore, his romance with single femShep in ME3 should be fundamentally different that his relationship with male Shepard in ME3, and I would certainly appreciate it if the Bioware writers used that opportunity to explore Kaidan and my male Shepard's relationship as a distinctly homosexual couple, and not just a relationship with a genderswapped femShep.

Modifié par KawaiiKatie, 28 juillet 2011 - 04:09 .


#7235
Jimmy Fury

Jimmy Fury
  • Members
  • 1 486 messages

KawaiiKatie wrote...
Again, I don't know why you assume that different equals bad. I don't know why the homosexual romances between Kaidan and manShep would be "shorter" or somehow less satisfying that the heterosexual romance between Kaidan and femShep. Again, I'm not asking for something radically different, but the foundation of Kaidan and male Shepard's relationship is already different than that of female Shepard and Kaidan, and this should be explored in ME3.


The homosexual romances are already shorter and less satisfying because they don't cover 3 games worth of content and never will.
Different equals bad because different equals priorities. This is still a video game with limited resources. Priorities are important and differences determine priorities.
The import, which you keep using as a comparison, is already exclusively straight. That's never going to change.
If it's a matter of Gay Content vs. Straight Content then the straight stuff will take priority. The straight audience is larger and, to be quite frank, the devs are part of that audience so the priority will be what appeals to them more.

BUT if it's a matter of Old Content vs. New Content, then the new versions will both get the same attention. If they can make a new gay romance and a new straight romance with a few differences as possible, that is what they'll do.
What you call lazy a business will call efficient. Fewer differences means less time spent writing, less time coding, less VA studio time, and more money at the end of the day.

edit: Ugh I do sound like finis. :pinched:
I AM TOO OPTIMISTIC FOR MY OWN PARANOIA. I SWEAR.

Modifié par Jimmy Fury, 28 juillet 2011 - 04:30 .


#7236
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages
Which really is why I don't want old Lis that need a lot of explanation for not going after Shepard. Garrus (thankfully) has to be approached first. So he doesn't need a lot of different dialogue. Just a "oh. You're interested? Let me think on that." and he can treat MShep and FShep nearly identical (seeing as that's what he does regardless unlike Kaidan).

And far too often gender differences = Oh someone's hitting on you crashly. Which...yeah not interesting to me. Just irksome. I rather have no difference than tat.  

Modifié par Ryzaki, 28 juillet 2011 - 04:30 .


#7237
TheMarshal

TheMarshal
  • Members
  • 2 339 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Which really is why I don't want old Lis that need a lot of explanation for not going after Shepard. Garrus (thankfully) has to be approached first. So he doesn't need a lot of different dialogue. Just a "oh. You're interested? Let me think on that." and he can treat MShep and FShep nearly identical (seeing as that's what he does regardless unlike Kaidan).

And far too often gender differences = Oh someone's hitting on you crashly. Which...yeah not interesting to me. Just irksome. I rather have no difference than tat.  


You don't think that there's going to be a lot of that going around with the o/s romances already?  They're going to allow the player to start up romances in ME3, no doubt about it, and there's going to have to be some sort of explanation about why the romance wasn't begun earlier.  Why would it be worse to have to explain why they didn't go after a s/s Shepard?

#7238
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

TheMarshal wrote...
You don't think that there's going to be a lot of that going around with the o/s romances already?  They're going to allow the player to start up romances in ME3, no doubt about it, and there's going to have to be some sort of explanation about why the romance wasn't begun earlier.  Why would it be worse to have to explain why they didn't go after a s/s Shepard?


I severely doubt they're gonna let new players romance someone from ME2 in ME3. Now they might let you pick your romance in ME3 via comic but that's gonna follow the route of the ME2 romance. Otherwise it's a massive drainage of resources. Which would just be stupid. Especially when you can achieve nearly the same thing via comic. 

So there's not gonna need to be any explanation in the first place there doesn't need to be. Not anymore than the people who picked Ash/Kaidan/Liara got from Gensis in ME2. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 28 juillet 2011 - 04:38 .


#7239
shepskisaac

shepskisaac
  • Members
  • 16 374 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Which really is why I don't want old Lis that need a lot of explanation for not going after Shepard.

Nope. Kaidan's explanation is short & simple "I thought you were straight". Nothing needs to be heavily explained, it was already written in ME1. Keep trying :kissing:

#7240
Jimmy Fury

Jimmy Fury
  • Members
  • 1 486 messages

IsaacShep wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

Which really is why I don't want old Lis that need a lot of explanation for not going after Shepard.

Nope. Kaidan's explanation is short & simple "I thought you were straight". Nothing needs to be heavily explained, it was already written in ME1. Keep trying :kissing:

Way to ignore the entire page worth of debate there...:?
Unless I'm mistaken and "a lot of explanation" didn't refer to what Katie has been talking about.

#7241
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

IsaacShep wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

Which really is why I don't want old Lis that need a lot of explanation for not going after Shepard.

Nope. Kaidan's explanation is short & simple "I thought you were straight". Nothing needs to be heavily explained, it was already written in ME1. Keep trying :kissing:


The lot of explanation refers to the romance itself. 

The s/s romance will need to have different tracks and alot of different dialogue from it's o/s version. You can't just say "Oh I thought you were straight. And now I'm going to treat you exactly like I would a female Shepard who rejected/ignored me." Doesn't work. He would need to treat male and female Shepard completely different. Which takes up resources. And since the s/s romances are used by a minority as it is they'll get the short end of the stick. ESPECIALLY if Kaidan is made romanceble by FemSheps during the course of ME3 as opposed to just through a comic. 

Kaidan Romance - ME1 - FemShep loyal, FemShep unloyal (if they bother) FemShep loyal paragon/renegade, FemShep unloyal paragon/renegade, s/s romance (if put in), o/s romance with FemShep. 

That's a minimum of 4 different romance tracks. And according to stats Kaidan is a character that isn't likely to be in a large number of games. 

Now what do you really think is gonna happen? Each romance will get a lesser amount of content then if they were all similar. 

BW couldn't even be bothered to differentianting between a recruited Garrus and a non-recruited Garrus from ME1 other than cutting of the romance. (he still refers to old times and still trusts newly known Shep the same way he trusts friends all along Shep). My hopes aren't exactly high. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 28 juillet 2011 - 04:59 .


#7242
Arik7

Arik7
  • Members
  • 1 095 messages
In DA2, there were probably 3-4 lines of different dialog for s/s vs m/f romance. It worked pretty well. ( I just wish all companions would have more dialog, instead of receiving a rear "quest" to speak to your companion at a specified location.) Also, BioWare should go back to ME1 style love scenes. It's supposed to be "M" for mature.

#7243
shepskisaac

shepskisaac
  • Members
  • 16 374 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

The lot of explanation refers to the romance itself. 

Not what you said: "a lot of explanation for not going after Shepard".

Ryzaki wrote...
The s/s romance will need to have different tracks and alot of different dialogue from it's o/s version. You can't just say "Oh I thought you were straight. And now I'm going to treat you exactly like I would a female Shepard who rejected/ignored me." Doesn't work. He would need to treat male and female Shepard completely different. Which takes up resources. And since the s/s romances are used by a minority as it is they'll get the short end of the stick. ESPECIALLY if Kaidan is made romanceble by FemSheps during the course of ME3 as opposed to just through a comic. 

And? Isn't it better it will actually ackowledge different history of the relationship between MaleShep and FemShep? Or are you just for "quantity over quality" a.k.a. give me as many LIs possible no matter if in the end the romance sucks balls because they did a horrible cope + paste job from the female romance?

EDIT: Didn't you also JUST talked about how you don't think there will NOT be a new o/s romance for FemSheps that didn't romance Kaidan in ME1? But I see you suddenly now assume it for granted for the purpouse of making it look like FemShep got ohh so many different Kaidan romances herself

Modifié par IsaacShep, 28 juillet 2011 - 05:03 .


#7244
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

Arik7 wrote...

In DA2, there were probably 3-4 lines of different dialog for s/s vs m/f romance. It worked pretty well. ( I just wish all companions would have more dialog, instead of receiving a rear "quest" to speak to your companion at a specified location.) Also, BioWare should go back to ME1 style love scenes. It's supposed to be "M" for mature.


The thing about DA2 though is all romances were on equal footing. There was no messy past history to deal with. 

Though I don't mind small amounts of differences. It's just when the romances start varying widely (like omission of certain information about the character's past) that I get annoyed. 

Well hopefully BW won't hamfist it like the Talimance if they decide to go the "I had feelings for you all along but thought I didn't have a chance." route. 

Ah screw it. I really can't be bothered. 

I wonder what will be the betrayal triggers for the LIs. Will it be the same as if they and Shep were only friends/acquaintances? 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 28 juillet 2011 - 05:13 .


#7245
Siansonea

Siansonea
  • Members
  • 7 282 messages
@Velanna Dalish: You're in the wrong thread, sweetheart. Take your HATE somewhere else. This is "For The Love". Got it?

Reported, BTW, just in case anyone else wants to try something like that. :police:

Modifié par Siansonea II, 28 juillet 2011 - 05:14 .


#7246
BrandNewMan

BrandNewMan
  • Members
  • 140 messages
In my personal opinion, a Kaidan romance will always feel disingenuous. Neither him nor Ashley were intended to be bisexual, according to Bioware themselves:

Both Shepard voice actors recorded both sides of the romance. The romance dialog was included in the main follower conversation file, and ultimately, it was considered faster just to have the actor do a take on every dialog line, regardless of whether it was one that would ever fire in game, than to spend part of the VO session trying to figure out whether a given line was on the romance track or not.

Once the lines were recorded, there was a brief high-level discussion about whether we should make Kaiden and Ashley bisexual, since the lines were already there. The leads decided not to do it. The lines work on a technical level, but they didn't do justice to the characters and sounded very strange sometimes. Beyond that, there were questions about having to do a different cutscene for different genders.

But to be clear, it was never part of the plan. It was only briefly considered after the lines were recorded, and it was only recorded because it was easier and faster than marking some lines as "Hale only records".



#7247
ArawnNox

ArawnNox
  • Members
  • 785 messages

BrandNewMan wrote...

In my personal opinion, a Kaidan romance will always feel disingenuous. Neither him nor Ashley were intended to be bisexual, according to Bioware themselves:

Both Shepard voice actors recorded both sides of the romance. The romance dialog was included in the main follower conversation file, and ultimately, it was considered faster just to have the actor do a take on every dialog line, regardless of whether it was one that would ever fire in game, than to spend part of the VO session trying to figure out whether a given line was on the romance track or not.

Once the lines were recorded, there was a brief high-level discussion about whether we should make Kaiden and Ashley bisexual, since the lines were already there. The leads decided not to do it. The lines work on a technical level, but they didn't do justice to the characters and sounded very strange sometimes. Beyond that, there were questions about having to do a different cutscene for different genders.

But to be clear, it was never part of the plan. It was only briefly considered after the lines were recorded, and it was only recorded because it was easier and faster than marking some lines as "Hale only records".



I'm sorry, that sounds like some damage control BS, to me.

#7248
Jimmy Fury

Jimmy Fury
  • Members
  • 1 486 messages

BrandNewMan wrote...

In my personal opinion, a Kaidan romance will always feel disingenuous. Neither him nor Ashley were intended to be bisexual, according to Bioware themselves:

Both Shepard voice actors recorded both sides of the romance. The romance dialog was included in the main follower conversation file, and ultimately, it was considered faster just to have the actor do a take on every dialog line, regardless of whether it was one that would ever fire in game, than to spend part of the VO session trying to figure out whether a given line was on the romance track or not.

Once the lines were recorded, there was a brief high-level discussion about whether we should make Kaiden and Ashley bisexual, since the lines were already there. The leads decided not to do it. The lines work on a technical level, but they didn't do justice to the characters and sounded very strange sometimes. Beyond that, there were questions about having to do a different cutscene for different genders.

But to be clear, it was never part of the plan. It was only briefly considered after the lines were recorded, and it was only recorded because it was easier and faster than marking some lines as "Hale only records".

That's been long since dismissed as complete and utter BS.
Voice work takes days and costs thousands of dollars. You have to pay for the studio time, pay the actors, pay the engineers, mix the files, review the files, move them to the game, etc. etc. etc.
Marking lines would take hours and cost one marker and a few photocopies.

#7249
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages
That's not BS Jimmy they do read from the same script it seems. It happened in DA2 as well. There's lines with M!Hawke saying F!Hawke's lines. (Like "if he has blue eyes and a killer smile I'll marry him on the spot!") which refers to F!Hawke talking about either Anders or the man Leandra wanted to engage her to. Not sure which. It's not a male Hawke line however. Not to mention "festooned in ruffles!" towards the dressmaker. Dude Hawke doesn't say that but Fem Hawke does. 

Not to mention this from ME1. 

dude Shep also calls himself a woman. They're reading from the same (if not a eeriely similar save a few pronoun changes) script. 

Edit: before my throat gets clogged by someone jumping down it. I'm not saying I believe any part of the quote other than "they read from the same script." is true. 

BW has no problem throwing away excess dialogue. (As proven by the dialogue from certain characters that shouldn't even be in certain areas [Legion on Jack's recruitment mission]). 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 28 juillet 2011 - 05:44 .


#7250
Jimmy Fury

Jimmy Fury
  • Members
  • 1 486 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

That's not BS Jimmy. It happened in DA2 as well. There's lines with M!Hawke saying F!Hawke's lines. (Like "if he has blue eyes and a killer smile I'll marry him on the spot!") which refers to F!Hawke talking about either Anders or the man Leandra wanted to engage her to. Not sure which. It's not a male Hawke line however. Not to mention "festooned in ruffles!" towards the dressmaker. Dude Hawke doesn't say that but Fem Hawke does.

Don't care what they did in DA2 the "We recorded it only because it was easier and faster and it was never our intention to ever make anyone bisexual" is absolute BS.
If it was a couple of lines maybe, but multiple scenes worth of dialogue?
No. I absolutely can not process in what reality more work, and more expensive work, is easier or faster.

Either it's BS or Gaider flat out lied about how expensive and time consuming voice work is when he was explaining why we might not see s/s content in a game.