♂♂ • ♀♀ For The Love — The Same-Sex Romance Discussion Thread **may contain spoilers**
#10901
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 06:25
Y'all don't want to get hit on by people who you really, really don't want to sleep with? Y'all don't want to experience that squidgy uncomfortable feeling of turning down someone you like, but just not like that? Y'all don't want to walk around people who should be your comrades and allies and suspect they're eyeing you up like a slab of meat?
Welcome to my whole Goddamn life. Except, you know, that it's a video game and will only happen once per person guaranteed, a maximum of maybe three times the whole game through, and will be completely 100% avoidable every time. I would really like to see statistics on how many women complain about the (nearly perfect, and I say this as a player who has wanted to smack the dude since Awakening) Anders flirt vs. how many men.
I'm with Abispa. People will complain about everything. And I'll be here to hand out tiny invisible violins when they do.
#10902
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 06:35
Guest_Puddi III_*
bleetman wrote...
ElitePinecone wrote...
even David Gaider has conceded he probably wouldn't make the Anders advance if he were writing DA2 again, given the controversy it caused
That makes me indescribably sad to hear.
I would question that seeing as how David Gaider didn't even write Anders in DA2.
Modifié par Filament, 07 octobre 2011 - 06:36 .
#10903
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 06:36
#10904
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 07:01
Quething wrote...
No, he *has* said that. I was confused at the time, myself. I think he means in a supervisorial role, he wouldn't have let that through?
Yeah, he is the lead writer, I believe.
I'll try and track down the quote, it was in the DA2 forums.
Here's the quote:
The truth is that making a romance available for both genders is far less costly than creating an entirely new one. Does it create some issues of implementation? Sure-- but anything you try on this front is going to have its issues, and inevitably you'll always leave someone out in the cold. In this case, are all straight males left out in the cold? Not at all. There are romances available for them just the same as anyone else. Not all straight males require that their content be exclusive, after all, and you can see that even on this thread.
Would I do it again? I don't know. I doubt I would have Anders make the first move again-- at the time, I thought that requiring all romances to have Hawke initiate everything was the unrealistic part. Even if someone decides that this makes everyone "unrealistically" bisexual, however, or they can't handle the idea that the character [color=rgb(170, 170, 170)">might ]want [/color]to romance. That's why romances are optional content. It's such a personal issue that we'll never be able to please everyone. The very best we can do is give everyone a little bit of choice, and that's what we tried here.
http://social.biowar...75&lf=8#6665212
Modifié par ElitePinecone, 07 octobre 2011 - 07:05 .
#10905
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 08:29
It's almost amusing to me that some people still harbor the illusion that only straight males play video-games. I hope BioWare continues to break barriers and keep its progressive attitude.
The primary argument is that the straight male community makes up most of the gaming community, and therefor, should receive the most attention. This is where it gets tricky. Just exactly how many straight romance options do you think the straight male community needs compared to the gay community, and how "protected" from gay advances does the straight community need to be?
Unfortunately, this topic that the poster made has more to do with the loaded real-world politics behind sexuality, rather than the actual game-mechanics. He got hit on by a male character, it offended him, so then he made it into the fault of the game's creators that he was offended.
#10906
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 08:34
Mostly because there's never a good harsh rejection.
#10907
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 09:09
Quething wrote...
I have so little pity for people who complain about being hit on without their express written invitation, I cannot even begin to tell you. A ninjamance is a problem because the PC ends up doing something the player did not agree to. If an NPC does something the player did not agree to, that is called characterization.
Y'all don't want to get hit on by people who you really, really don't want to sleep with? Y'all don't want to experience that squidgy uncomfortable feeling of turning down someone you like, but just not like that? Y'all don't want to walk around people who should be your comrades and allies and suspect they're eyeing you up like a slab of meat?
Welcome to my whole Goddamn life. Except, you know, that it's a video game and will only happen once per person guaranteed, a maximum of maybe three times the whole game through, and will be completely 100% avoidable every time. I would really like to see statistics on how many women complain about the (nearly perfect, and I say this as a player who has wanted to smack the dude since Awakening) Anders flirt vs. how many men.
I'm with Abispa. People will complain about everything. And I'll be here to hand out tiny invisible violins when they do.
You're absolutely right. But, as pretty much all supporters of s/s already know, trying to make the people against it see that is like trying to teach deaf people to hear. You can yell in their ears for hours but they still won't hear anything. (Was that offensive? I hope not. It was just an analogy >.<)
Modifié par katerinafm, 07 octobre 2011 - 09:09 .
#10908
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 10:04
katerinafm wrote...
You're absolutely right. But, as pretty much all supporters of s/s already know, trying to make the people against it see that is like trying to teach deaf people to hear. You can yell in their ears for hours but they still won't hear anything. (Was that offensive? I hope not. It was just an analogy >.<)
I usually use the "singing pig" analogy:
"Trying to make the people against it [s/s] see that is like trying to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of your time and it annoys the pig."
#10909
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 10:29
katerinafm wrote...
Quething wrote...
snip
Agree that people are overreacting, but I can understand Bioware's position. It's a lot easier to make all romances player-initiated than to suffer with the moaning.
It has the side-effect of eliminating advances on players who want to avoid romantic content entirely, or (as we've seen) mSheps who want to avoid advances from women, or femSheps from men. Which is, ultimately, probably a good thing.
In a perfect world I'd tell people complaining about a few lines of flirting from an NPC, that can be ignored, to STFU. But the fanbase being what it is, I'm not disappointed at all that there'll be no advances on the player. Frankly I'd rather not deal with the forum threads and ignorance that would come with it.
#10910
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 11:40
Quething wrote...
I have so little pity for people who complain about being hit on without their express written invitation, I cannot even begin to tell you. A ninjamance is a problem because the PC ends up doing something the player did not agree to. If an NPC does something the player did not agree to, that is called characterization.
Y'all don't want to get hit on by people who you really, really don't want to sleep with? Y'all don't want to experience that squidgy uncomfortable feeling of turning down someone you like, but just not like that? Y'all don't want to walk around people who should be your comrades and allies and suspect they're eyeing you up like a slab of meat?
Welcome to my whole Goddamn life. Except, you know, that it's a video game and will only happen once per person guaranteed, a maximum of maybe three times the whole game through, and will be completely 100% avoidable every time. I would really like to see statistics on how many women complain about the (nearly perfect, and I say this as a player who has wanted to smack the dude since Awakening) Anders flirt vs. how many men.
I'm with Abispa. People will complain about everything. And I'll be here to hand out tiny invisible violins when they do.
This is why you're one of my favorite posters in this forum. RIGHT ON!
If I took offense for every girl that ever hit on me I'd be more sour than a Warhead. Seriously, this is the best example of how overpriviledged straight people are: "OH NOES! ONE GAY PERSON IS HITTINS ON ME! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!" Meanwhile we have to rebuff people left and right and have been doing it for years.
#10911
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 02:34
Modifié par Chris Priestly, 07 octobre 2011 - 04:18 .
#10912
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 02:48
Modifié par Chris Priestly, 07 octobre 2011 - 04:19 .
#10913
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 02:50
Indigo the Cat wrote...
The primary argument is that the straight male community makes up most of the gaming community, and therefor, should receive the most attention. This is where it gets tricky. Just exactly how many straight romance options do you think the straight male community needs compared to the gay community, and how "protected" from gay advances does the straight community need to be?
This is interesting to me considering the romances for straight women.
As I've mentioned before, BW used to provide more female options for straight men than they did male options for straight women. In recent games, these options have been equal in spite of those that want to romance men being in the minority.
I suppose giving this minority group equal options to 'the straight male gamer' is okay b/c it doesn't impose on the 'straight males' game as most of them probably don't even play as a female anyway. Though, I guess they don't realize that male romances for females takes away resources from them....derp.
#10914
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 02:50
Not worth even responding. Just hit the report button like I did and let's go back to drolling all over Kaidan, Vega & JacobXilizhra wrote...
Nothing, you've said enough.
#10915
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 02:52
Report for what, if I may ask?IsaacShep wrote...
Not worth even responding. Just hit the report button like I did and let's go back to drolling all over Kaidan, Vega & JacobXilizhra wrote...
Nothing, you've said enough.
#10916
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 02:54
Azbeszt wrote...
Report for what, if I may ask?IsaacShep wrote...
Not worth even responding. Just hit the report button like I did and let's go back to drolling all over Kaidan, Vega & JacobXilizhra wrote...
Nothing, you've said enough.
Shoo.From board intro topic...
Mass Effect 3 also has same sex relationships. If you do not enjoy or approve of same sex relationships, please stay out of discussion on these topics.
#10917
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 02:55
Oh, my apologies then.Xilizhra wrote...
Azbeszt wrote...
Report for what, if I may ask?IsaacShep wrote...
Not worth even responding. Just hit the report button like I did and let's go back to drolling all over Kaidan, Vega & JacobXilizhra wrote...
Nothing, you've said enough.Shoo.From board intro topic...
Mass Effect 3 also has same sex relationships. If you do not enjoy or approve of same sex relationships, please stay out of discussion on these topics.
#10918
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 02:56
Again, for a game with such a passionate fanbase from both sides (pro s/s and not), it's the safer route to have romances initiated by the player. If only to avoid the extra headache we'd get from people whining about a possible flirting line that could possibly hurt the player's delicate feelings (perhaps I'm being too harsh, but to me if you felt comfortable of your sexuality, you wouldn't care at all if a member of the same sex showed an interest. But I'm overanalysing again...).
If the fanbase wasn't so...immature regarding certain parts of the game, then I would be all for adding more and more realism to a game like Mass Effect, meaning that members of the same sex (if it fit their personality) could make advances on you, and if you didn't like it you'd just have to deal with it. Personally, I'm getting sick of having to justify it to what appears to be a certain group of people over and over again because it's pointless.
But hey, let's just be happy we have made 'progress' and try to ignore the possible downsides as best we can. Fits for my birthday
Modifié par katerinafm, 07 octobre 2011 - 03:10 .
#10919
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 03:04
Modifié par Chris Priestly, 07 octobre 2011 - 04:20 .
#10920
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 03:40
Modifié par Chris Priestly, 07 octobre 2011 - 04:20 .
#10921
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 03:42
#10922
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 03:57
Modifié par Chris Priestly, 07 octobre 2011 - 04:20 .
#10923
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 04:00
#10924
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 04:00
Modifié par Chris Priestly, 07 octobre 2011 - 04:21 .
#10925
Posté 07 octobre 2011 - 04:04
lazuli wrote...
What sort of romance culmination scenes do you guys/gals expect in ME3? I'm not anticipating much beyond a fade to black, what with all of the possible romances available at this point in the series. If it's unbalanced and certain characters receive a more prolonged or elaborate scene, I suppose we can expect all kinds of fan-rage.
Well, DA:O had the epilogue screens and I wasn't that pleased with them. They're certainly the easiest thing to do. Something like the kissing scene in Jade Empire might be nice, right after the final reaper is destroyed with the sun setting behind its smoldering corpse. =P





Retour en haut





