No, the Code doesn't.
But the sense I get from Samara is that... her self-image as a Justicar does, I guess? She became a Justicar as a sort of abdication of personal responsibility. She doesn't want to make another mistake like Morinth, but of course having a vampire for a daughter isn't something that's actually within her control. It's just... a thing that happened. So she fled into a worldview where things can't ever just happen. If her actions cleave to the Code, she can't screw up again. She's safe, and she's absolved of any kind of Morinth-like guilt and free of any Morinth-like mistakes in the future.
But that very much requires there being
nothing but the Code. Other Justicars follow the Code for other reasons, and thus presumably can have personal lives so long as those lives don't interfere (I imagine it'd be a hassle, since you'd have to shank your beloved if she shorted a tip, but every relationship has its foibles). But Samara making decisions of her own outside the Code would give her responsibility and allow her to screw up again, which would defeat the whole point. So she avoids relationships because they make her no longer 100% by-the-Code Justicar.
Which has nothing to do with the Ardat-Yakshi thing directly, and of course, why would it? She doesn't have to have kids to have sex with Shep, and even if they did have kids they wouldn't be pureblood and couldn't be A-Y anyway.
But it does still draw the unfortunate inadvertent connection that "a pureblood who prefers other asari swore herself to celibacy in order to cleave more closely to the ultimate standard of asari lawfulness and righteousness," which adds a bit of extra institutional/legal support to the queer-hating metaphor that we're otherwise supposed to dismiss as wrong.
Modifié par Quething, 23 octobre 2011 - 02:46 .