SolidBeast wrote...
ElitePinecone wrote...
<snip>
snip
I understand the fairness thing, I really do.
I was just struck that it seems petty to insist on a character's exclusivity *solely* because opening them up to other genders would 'water down' the available options or be considered unequal. Because that only works if you're tallying mShep and femShep LIs.
In absolute terms, an m/m LI is an m/m LI. What femShep players do with them seems irrelevant, doesn't it? While I do get the fairness issue (one m/m LI against however many other m/f and f/f ones), excluding female players from a Cortez romance *solely* because you think they're already over-entitled is odd, if the aim is eventually to have all LIs romancable by all genders.
And if the argument is that being bisexual weakens the character, then we're back to the biphobia and "nooo character ruined because bisexual people aren't unique" argument that we've heard so much from s/s detractors.
Personally, I think erring on the side of giving players greater choice where appropriate is never a bad thing. Part of me does appreciate the exclusivity of characters like Sam and Steve, if only because we've literally seen almost nothing of the type in the industry (perhaps Fallout aside?).
That said, if femShep players really did want to romance Cortez, and Bioware felt compelled to make it work with the character (instead of a grating 'married gay character falls for femShep' scenario) I'd be happy for them in a heartbeat.
Blacklash93 wrote...
Kelly still managed to look pretty distinctive, though.
Well... until Kenson came along, anyway.
Ugh. Don't remind me. Chakwas and Kelly face mix of doom D: