Ricvenart wrote...
Implied Werewolf sex = fine, Implied Gay Werewolf sex = Call the police? I'm not saying it wouldn't be inappropriate but it's a weird place to draw the line.
I agree. I'm just trying to say they don't really compare, the differences between Biowares character driven romances and Fables random ones. I'll just leave it at that, I don't think reaver was intended to be a negative portrayal of bi sexuality, it was just his Dorian Grey complex, but that is as far as lionhead goes really for s/s within a story, for good or bad.
Was it the part where you fell into a coma for 5 months? Or when the big bad the game had been building up came and went?
Because people will wail and gnash at the teeth at one of the few openly gay couples being into beastility. We both know that what would happen. Better off to avoid the headache.
Pretty sure Reaver is just bad all around. Everything about him is supposed to be creepy to me.
Nah it was the part where...where X...
erilben wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
...
[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/pouty.png[/smilie]
You've gots to be kidding me. He did not say that with a straight face. Walmart? WALMART?!?
All
he said was for Walmart to "suck it" in response to when people were
talking about same sex options, and about how Bioware was saying that
dumb thing about asari not counting. If you want see it for yourself: here

![=]](https://lvlt.forum.bioware.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sideways.png)

*facepalms*
Modifié par Ryzaki, 15 février 2012 - 03:50 .