ElitePinecone wrote...
I think it's a legitimate thing to talk about; if we're wondering about options (or the lack of options) it's probably good to question why they're here now, why they weren't there before, and how to make sure they're more likely in future projects.
But one thing though - this is the fourth or fifth time I've said it, but Bioware's staff are (generally) some of the most liberal people *evar*. Producers, managers, writers, exeutives - they all regularly blog and tweet about causes like feminism or lgbt rights. Not just in the Dragon Age team, but also among many of ME's staff.
So as much as we get frustrated with the ridiculous answers to questions (Shepard is a pre-defined character with a pre-defined view!), I'd suggest it's more likely to be other pressures (the publisher, time constraints, a scared executive team, retailers) and not the fault of the writers or designers that there's been an absence of s/s.
More likely it was a business decision (the target market would run screaming from the room if an m/m romance was in the game) and not a deliberate slight.
Admittedly, I don't follow tweets, or that sort of thing. The only information I get concerning BW staff are from second-hand sources, when being discussed by regular people like in this forum. I difinetely get the impression that BW staff are liberal, and I don't believe in the slightest that any ommision was a [purposeful] slight against us. I highly doubt that the creatives would shy away from m/m, and I agree that the decision to omit would be top-level for business reasons alone.
Oh, and I'm not the type of person who believes that gay characters/content
needs to be in every game (or any for that matter), because for most games, it wouldn't make sense, or would feel forced. But one correction regarding your comment: there was s/s, just not m/m, and that disparity is partly what makes me so angry about the whole mess.
This was my path of discovery/rage after playing ME1:
- Find out mShep can't romance Kaidan: oh well, you can't have everything in life
- Find out f/f was present: what? that hardly seems fair
- Liara doesn't count as s/s because <verbal gymnastics>: well that's bull****
- Shepard is defined and can't be gay: double bull****! especially since ME is supposedly about choices; you can play as a woman; choose different backgrounds, etc
- Find out m/m dialogue was present on the disc: so it appears m/m was present but later cut... now I'm mad
- Time constraints: triple bull****! playing as male or female, the dialogue with Kaidan is 99.9% the same, and in an 80 hour game they couldn't finish a 2 min m/m scene (or even do an embrace-fade to black)?
There is no reason that m/m content needs to be in any game. But with ME, given all of the above, I get the impression that it was purposefully excluded at some point. The real question in my mind is, was that decision internal (BW), or
external (in this case, MS). Given BW's liberal-ness, this is why I lean
toward MS being the culprit. And I'm not trying to build a case against MS, because again, just speculation on my part. It's just... none of the explanations really add up for me.
In fact, having rehashed all this, I realize it's all Liara's fault! I love ME, and could have played through a trilogy none-the-wiser, but Liara's inclusion is what tipped the balance

Ultimately, they've become more inclusive for part 3, which imo is great in-and-of itself. We'll just have to wait to see how great it turns out.
/end therepeutic rant