RinjiRenee wrote...
SolidBeast wrote...
Why not? Are you implying that gender and sexuality is the only relevant trait in a character? That homosexuals must only relate to homosexuals and heterosexuals must only relate to heterosexuals?
It's a pretty important thing when it comes to wanting to romance that character, I'd say yes to that.
And because homosexuals don't have the same amount of option as heterosexuals, I am more willing to forgive them.
Trolololol I don't even read fanfiction because of silly things like this.
umm... but when the same reasoning was given by people trying to explain why they didn't want previously m/f LI's only to be availabel for s/s - they were terribly wrong and shallow etc etc?
I'm sorry, if sexuality is important, its important no matter which sexuality it is. and if its secondary to the character themselves, then the boundary is purely personal. and you are perfectly entiteled to your personal boundaries. and hopefuly understand better the personalboundaries of others, even if they run oposite to yours.
someone a while ago said, why they wanted m/m romance despite being a straight female. they relate to playing male character better. they don't like playing female characters. but they still like guys, so if they want to romance someone, they want to romance a guy.
this same reasoning works in another direction. someone doesn't like playing a male character, but they relaly REALLY like a particular romance that's not normaly available to them. sometimes it means modding Ashley, or Miranda, or Jack, or Tali to like femshep. and sometimes? it can mean modding Steve.
personaly, I don't share this, OR like this, so i plan on romancing Steve with a maleShepard, because anything esle feels like it doesn't fit. but I understand, beleive me I understand why others might not feel the same way. i don't have to like it and neither to you. but try to understand it.