Aller au contenu

Photo

Best game ever!


307 réponses à ce sujet

#251
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

Persephone wrote...

Dariuszp wrote...

Yes, characters are bunch of bi/gay people (how is that Hawk can only gather this kind of people ? bad luck or what ?) that want to f*** you. Nothing more.

About dialogues. "I WIN" scenerio is in ME. Here you just have 3 answers. Good/stupid/bad in this order. With icons so you can be sure. It's so stupid and simple that it's insulting like csfteeeeer said.


Have you even PLAYED DAII? Given the outright lies above, I doubt it. Never mind your constant sexism and repetetive vitriol spouting. Go play BG with its stereotypical "romances". (Sorry, as a woman, I despise Anomen)


He's trolling Persephone. Rather badly I might add. To Darius....



http://www.fatwallet.com/query/tpc.php?pvid=589827537&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fatwallet.com%2Fstatic%2Fattachments%2F5323_obvious_troll.jpg&t=&h=%3CIMG%20border%3D0%20src%3D%22%2Fstatic%2Fattachments%2Fthumbnails%2F5323_obvious_troll.jpg%22%3E&sel=%23t13641530%3E.post_content%3E.userMsg%3ETABLE%3ETBODY%3ETR%3ETD%3E.attachment-preview%3EA%5Bhref%3D'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fatwallet.com%2Fstatic%2Fattachments%2F5323_obvious_troll.jpg'%5D&1309153631937&redir=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fatwallet.com%2Fstatic%2Fattachments%2F5323_obvious_troll.jpg

#252
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages
I wish trolls these days were as adorable as this

Image IPB

And no, this is not me trying to troll.

#253
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages
let me guess: The Witcher?

#254
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages
Yes, but they genuinely are adorable!

#255
Dariuszp

Dariuszp
  • Members
  • 500 messages
No ;-) I just said that Shooters have low point of entry (shooters are simple and very easy to play) so it's perfect for stupid people. And they want to make RPG the same. Lower point of entry. But entire RPG genre supose to be complex right ? Not anymore i see... Years ago they NEXT game got new features, upgrades nad stuff. They try to make things better. Dont know what happened but now they do oposite thing.

One of the most stupid shooters was Prey. You was fighting with monsters, get killed, have some minigame and you return to fight. No penalty. To put this game to test i fight some boss only with basic weapons and no dodging of hiding. Gues what, it's take longer to kill but i still kill him and win. How ? Shoot. Get killed. Minigame. Shoot, get killed. Minigame. Shoot... bam... he is dead. Call of Duty ? Simple. You point, you shoot. If you get killed, you spawn 5 meters bofore place you were and do it again. Even enemies will be in the same place. Still, except hardest difficult settings, you just stand there and shoot. On hardest if you take too much bulletts, you take cover, wait 5 seconds to regein your health and go forward. Almost like GOD MODE. It's hard to get killed in a shooter! I didnt say that it's only for stupid people. I play shooters. Bad Company 2 on multiplayer, i did like old Rainbow Six games and few others. Still except few tactic games like SWAT, Rainbow Six and few others - shooters today are one of the easiest games out there.

@The Ethereal Writer Redux, here you go:

Image IPB

#256
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

 I just said that Shooters have low point of entry (shooters are simple and very easy to play) so it's perfect for stupid people.



you literally just said that shooters are made for stupid people in your first sentence....



Congratulations. You're a massive idiot.


EDIT: For proof.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 27 juin 2011 - 06:06 .


#257
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages
Well technically he said it's easier for stupid people. Not that it's only stupid people who play them.

Whatever worth that premise has.

#258
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages
not much.


EDIT: When you're not playing against 6 year old campers (and that's rare mind you), you do have to think about how you're going to kill someone in Call of Duty. It's not as easy as people make it out to be.


Of course, if you camp your ass off it's easy. Because you're camping.


But then there's also the objectives like capture the flag, sabotage, etc. You actually have to devise a strategy. Pointing and shooting isn't going to be enough.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 27 juin 2011 - 06:18 .


#259
Dariuszp

Dariuszp
  • Members
  • 500 messages
Yeah but here you talk about multiplayer. That's different. I was talking about single player. Multiplayer is different story because everyone have same amount of health, armor (in some games). They can select weapons that they like. They need skills to dodge/shoot, brain to outsmart enemies and experience.
Best example - Bad Company 2. How you know that someone is fresh in BC2 ? After he shoot from a window he hide behind wall. Send him a granade... he will learn.

#260
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages
Single player has you facing AI and AI sucks for most games. It's not just limited to shooters.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 27 juin 2011 - 06:24 .


#261
Wolfborn Son

Wolfborn Son
  • Members
  • 99 messages
Best game ever? No. I'd give that title to either Baldur's Gate II or Castlevania: Symphony of the Night.

Better than Dragon Age: Origins? I personally think so. Neither even in my top twenty, but I had far more faults with DA:O than I did DAII. For a game that was hailed as the "spiritual sequel" to Baldur's Gate II, it came off more as a better version of Neverwinter Nights. <sarcasm>At least Dragon Age II had exploding enemies.</sarcasm>

EDIT:  Cleared something up.  My rage against DA:O not even being close to Baldur's Gate II crossed by brain!

Modifié par Wolfborn Son, 27 juin 2011 - 07:20 .


#262
snfonseka

snfonseka
  • Members
  • 2 469 messages
 No offence, but OP needs to play some more games :innocent:.

#263
Cyberarmy

Cyberarmy
  • Members
  • 2 285 messages

snfonseka wrote...

 No offence, but OP needs to play some more games :innocent:.


End of the line :)

#264
Gunderic

Gunderic
  • Members
  • 717 messages

Persephone wrote...

Dariuszp wrote...

Yes, characters are bunch of bi/gay people (how is that Hawk can only gather this kind of people ? bad luck or what ?) that want to f*** you. Nothing more.

About dialogues. "I WIN" scenerio is in ME. Here you just have 3 answers. Good/stupid/bad in this order. With icons so you can be sure. It's so stupid and simple that it's insulting like csfteeeeer said.


Have you even PLAYED DAII? I doubt it. Go play BG with its stereotypical "romances".


... Opposite day? Sometimes I get the feeling that's all people here care for, too...

#265
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

Gunderic wrote...

Persephone wrote...

Dariuszp wrote...

Yes, characters are bunch of bi/gay people (how is that Hawk can only gather this kind of people ? bad luck or what ?) that want to f*** you. Nothing more.

About dialogues. "I WIN" scenerio is in ME. Here you just have 3 answers. Good/stupid/bad in this order. With icons so you can be sure. It's so stupid and simple that it's insulting like csfteeeeer said.


Have you even PLAYED DAII? I doubt it. Go play BG with its stereotypical "romances".


... Opposite day? Sometimes I get the feeling that's all people here care for, too...


Sorry. I usually play female characters. I don't get multiple romance options in unmodded BGII. I'm stuck with Anomen. Stereotype on legs. Thank the Maker for Mods!:D

#266
Dragonageloverrr

Dragonageloverrr
  • Members
  • 95 messages
i really loved this game the combat made it a little more better but the story was what got me feeling kinda sad there was no real ending just a cliffhanger

#267
Gotholhorakh

Gotholhorakh
  • Members
  • 1 480 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

 I just said that Shooters have low point of entry (shooters are simple and very easy to play) so it's perfect for stupid people.



you literally just said that shooters are made for stupid people in your first sentence....


No. A low point of entry making it perfect for stupid people is not the same as saying it's MADE FOR stupid people, or that only stupid people play them.

Ambidextrous tin openers are perfect for left-handed people. They are not MADE FOR left-handed people. :D

Modifié par Gotholhorakh, 27 juin 2011 - 05:19 .


#268
Chromie

Chromie
  • Members
  • 9 881 messages

Gotholhorakh wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

 I just said that Shooters have low point of entry (shooters are simple and very easy to play) so it's perfect for stupid people.



you literally just said that shooters are made for stupid people in your first sentence....


No. A low point of entry making it perfect for stupid people is not the same as saying it's MADE FOR stupid people, or that only stupid people play them.

Ambidextrous tin openers are perfect for left-handed people. They are not MADE FOR left-handed people. :D


Dragon Age 2 is perfect for stupid people.

#269
Realmzmaster

Realmzmaster
  • Members
  • 5 510 messages

Ringo12 wrote...

Gotholhorakh wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

 I just said that Shooters have low point of entry (shooters are simple and very easy to play) so it's perfect for stupid people.



you literally just said that shooters are made for stupid people in your first sentence....


No. A low point of entry making it perfect for stupid people is not the same as saying it's MADE FOR stupid people, or that only stupid people play them.

Ambidextrous tin openers are perfect for left-handed people. They are not MADE FOR left-handed people. :D


Dragon Age 2 is perfect for stupid people.


Really? Please elaborate. Because I am hoping someone with your superior intellect can give a better explanation than this one liner. Because last time I checked it requires a greater degree of intelligence to use a computer and or video game system. Not to mention reading comprehension if you want to read the manual and in game text.

#270
Dariuszp

Dariuszp
  • Members
  • 500 messages
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1-1+1+1+1+1x0 = ?

Here. Test for your inteligence. If you fail - you cannot play DA II (joke) :P

#271
philippe willaume

philippe willaume
  • Members
  • 1 465 messages

Dariuszp wrote...

1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1-1+1+1+1+1x0 = ?

Here. Test for your inteligence. If you fail - you cannot play DA II (joke) :P


Is that not more a math synthax test?
you see a gu that liked DA:0 would have used inverted polish.

phil

#272
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

Dariuszp wrote...

1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1-1+1+1+1+1x0 = ?

Here. Test for your inteligence. If you fail - you cannot play DA II (joke) :P


dammit.... 0 isn't it.


12... I think.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 27 juin 2011 - 10:46 .


#273
Sutekh

Sutekh
  • Members
  • 1 089 messages

Dariuszp wrote...

1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1-1+1+1+1+1x0 = ?

Here. Test for your inteligence. If you fail - you cannot play DA II (joke) :P


Ok, I'll bite.

Multiplication goes first, and there's a minus in ambush in there, so we have:

(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)+(1-1)+(1+1+1)+(1x0) =

9 + 0 + 3 + 0 =12

#274
Gunderic

Gunderic
  • Members
  • 717 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Dariuszp wrote...

1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1-1+1+1+1+1x0 = ?

Here. Test for your inteligence. If you fail - you cannot play DA II (joke) :P


dammit.... 0 isn't it.


12... I think.


Don't think you can play Dragon Age 2 anymore. :P

EDIT: going by the first answers ( not 12 ).

Modifié par Gunderic, 27 juin 2011 - 10:50 .


#275
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages
Being out of school for so long makes you forget about necessary math stuff....


like PEMDAS.


damn you brain, how could you forget PEMDAS?!

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 27 juin 2011 - 10:49 .