Jonata wrote...
...there could be many points of view about why Jack is what she is during ME2, and how she actually is, but she has one of the most compelling personality of the entire trilogy and one of the best character arc, so you cannot say she is a cliche or an "emo grimdark" girl (jeez!), that means you do not understood the character behind her attitude. There's nothing wrong with that, but it's simply not right and kind of shallow.
I’ll preface this by stating explicitly that what I write below is my
opinion.
I didn’t say she
is a cliché. I wish I could express my problem with how she was portrayed in ME2 better, because the distinction between “she
is emo grimdark” and “she came across as emo grimdark” is the crux of my argument. I‘ll also remind you that I was responding to someone else calling those who didn’t like ME2 Jack shallow, which is essential in understanding the context.
Someone else a couple posts up talked about how Jack is putting up this tough front that you have to get through, but that’s explicitly not my point either.
The way the on-ship Jack was written is
not the tough front of someone who’s genuinely troubled for want of a better word. The way she is written is the tough front of an emo grimdark person with imaginary problems. The writers cranked her up to 11 when 10 or even 9 would have been better and more realistic.
That is my problem. It’s a failing of the writing, not the character itself, and I think that was a turnoff for many people.
You’re welcome to disagree, of course, but please don’t insult my intelligence by asserting that there’s one single correct interpretation.