EDIT: Ooo, been a while since I had a ToP.
Modifié par viggorrah, 21 décembre 2011 - 08:28 .
Modifié par viggorrah, 21 décembre 2011 - 08:28 .
Modifié par SgtPepper667, 21 décembre 2011 - 09:11 .
Modifié par viggorrah, 21 décembre 2011 - 09:22 .
CDRSkyShepard wrote...
ekurian wrote...
Soooo... Is it too late to join the Jokermance boat?
It's never too late to jump on the Jokermance boat!
Modifié par Negam, 21 décembre 2011 - 09:23 .
Ah! Thank you! I was about to drive myself crazy, haha.viggorrah wrote...
Thanks, Peps.
How to link to the thread: you have the image tags yes? All you do is put "[url =social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/325/index/7625605][/url]" (minus the space) around them. So it'll be like *url tag* *img tag* */img tag* */url tag*
EDIT: formatting.
Negam wrote...
This.
I'll ask you this again, because the first time I did, only Namira did offer an answer, and I'm still curious. If there is no proper Jokermance in ME3, would at least a fling a lá Kelly be enough for you? Would you settle for a non-full-fledged romance?
Edit: Oh, welcome, Ekurian. :happy:
I normally wouldn't support it, but at this point I just want Joker and Shepard to share an intimate moment together. I wouldn't call it a "fling", more like a "first date" XD I'm working on a Shepard, Sera, to be fully committed to Joker, no matter if he has a romance or not. She'll be single through the whole series if she has to. She's pretty much my canon Shep, haha.ekurian wrote...
I will not settle for anything less than a fully fledged romance, DAMNIT. *slams hand down on desk*
Joker deserves it!
I wasn't much for the Kelly-fling myself- I suppose it works for some people, but not me. I'm comitted like that.
I like this human. XDekurian wrote...
I will not settle for anything less than a fully fledged romance, DAMNIT. *slams hand down on desk*
Joker deserves it!
I wasn't much for the Kelly-fling myself- I suppose it works for some people, but not me. I'm comitted like that.
ekurian wrote...
Negam wrote...
This.
I'll ask you this again, because the first time I did, only Namira did offer an answer, and I'm still curious. If there is no proper Jokermance in ME3, would at least a fling a lá Kelly be enough for you? Would you settle for a non-full-fledged romance?
Edit: Oh, welcome, Ekurian. :happy:
I will not settle for anything less than a fully fledged romance, DAMNIT. *slams hand down on desk*
Joker deserves it!
I wasn't much for the Kelly-fling myself- I suppose it works for some people, but not me. I'm comitted like that.
SgtPepper667 wrote...
I normally wouldn't support it, but at this point I just want Joker and Shepard to share an intimate moment together. I wouldn't call it a "fling", more like a "first date" XD I'm working on a Shepard, Sera, to be fully committed to Joker, no matter if he has a romance or not. She'll be single through the whole series if she has to. She's pretty much my canon Shep, haha.
I like you. You're awesome.ekurian wrote...
SgtPepper667 wrote...
I normally wouldn't support it, but at this point I just want Joker and Shepard to share an intimate moment together. I wouldn't call it a "fling", more like a "first date" XD I'm working on a Shepard, Sera, to be fully committed to Joker, no matter if he has a romance or not. She'll be single through the whole series if she has to. She's pretty much my canon Shep, haha.
Me too /D If he doesn't have a romance in ME3, my poor F!Shep will forever stare longingly at him. During every. Single. Cutscene. Even the serious ones where she should be doing her leader thing. If they have a 'fling', she'll still do it because she wants more.
Bioware what have you turned me into?
Ok so there's one "Yes"! Now to wait for the others.SgtPepper667 wrote...
Viggorrah...that is PERFECT. Valentine's Day...the ultimate love holiday. Count me in!
Now I kinda feel bad for saying that I would accept a fling...XD I guess I just REALLY want to see Joker and Shep together. He really does deserve a full fledged romance. I shouldn't settle for anything less >.<
All of this is so me, too!ekurian wrote...
SgtPepper667 wrote...
I normally wouldn't support it, but at this point I just want Joker and Shepard to share an intimate moment together. I wouldn't call it a "fling", more like a "first date" XD I'm working on a Shepard, Sera, to be fully committed to Joker, no matter if he has a romance or not. She'll be single through the whole series if she has to. She's pretty much my canon Shep, haha.
Me too /D If he doesn't have a romance in ME3, my poor F!Shep will forever stare longingly at him. During every. Single. Cutscene. Even the serious ones where she should be doing her leader thing. If they have a 'fling', she'll still do it because she wants more.
Bioware what have you turned me into?
Modifié par CDRSkyShepard, 21 décembre 2011 - 10:56 .
SgtPepper667 wrote...
I like you. You're awesome.
-gif snip-
viggorrah wrote...
Ok so there's one "Yes"! Now to wait for the others.
And yes, I agree. ekurian is pretty damn awesome.
Modifié par ekurian, 21 décembre 2011 - 10:59 .
ekurian wrote...
Edit for above post: SR2 Kittens? Does this mean... Kittens in Joker hats? Because that would be the cutest thing in the world.
Modifié par SgtPepper667, 21 décembre 2011 - 11:02 .
We're a very loving thread. :3ekurian wrote...
SgtPepper667 wrote...
I like you. You're awesome.
-gif snip-viggorrah wrote...
Ok so there's one "Yes"! Now to wait for the others.
And yes, I agree. ekurian is pretty damn awesome.
Y-you guys [smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/crying.png[/smilie]
I FEEL SO LOVED.And what is this about kitties and Valentine's day? Aw heck- I don't know what it is but I'm in anyway!
Edit for above post: SR2 Kittens? Does this mean... Kittens in Joker hats? Because that would be the cutest thing in the world.
Modifié par viggorrah, 21 décembre 2011 - 11:06 .
viggorrah wrote...
We're a very loving thread. :3
But yes. We intend to invade the BSN, starting on Valentine's Day it's looking like, by changing our avatars to cute kitties wearing SR2 hats; it's another way of showing that WE WANT OUR PILOT IN ME3!
And yes, that's exactly what that means. Here's mine (although I'm gonna change it a bit):