wright1978 wrote...
Well i've said on numerous occasions that there needs to be a lot more than in leak Miranda wise for me to be in any way happy.
There's also the central conversation of "her" mission missing from the script. There could be quite a bit going on there between the five people taking part in it. I just hope they didn't try to wrap everything except the endgame thing up in that one conversation.AgitatedLemon wrote...
I mean other than that.
Not having an end game contribution would just be downright silly.
wright1978 wrote...
Well i've said on numerous occasions that there needs to be a lot more than in leak Miranda wise for me to be in any way happy.
Ieldra2 wrote...
There's also the central conversation of "her" mission missing from the script. There could be quite a bit going on there between the five people taking part in it. I just hope they didn't try to wrap everything except the endgame thing up in that one conversation.AgitatedLemon wrote...
I mean other than that.
Not having an end game contribution would just be downright silly.
Miranda appears to get special treatment among the ME2-exclusives. So I still hope for her presence at...er...*spoiler location*.jtav wrote...
I think they will. It works that way for everyone else.
flemm wrote...
wright1978 wrote...
Well i've said on numerous occasions that there needs to be a lot more than in leak Miranda wise for me to be in any way happy.
Agreed. There has to be significantly more for it to be even complete, let alone awesome (which is what it should be).
However, for that precise reason, I think it is more... prudent to reserve judgment for the moment. It will be complete, at the very least.
android654 wrote...
I've read Thane's story. It makes sense to say the least.
wright1978 wrote...
flemm wrote...
wright1978 wrote...
Well i've said on numerous occasions that there needs to be a lot more than in leak Miranda wise for me to be in any way happy.
Agreed. There has to be significantly more for it to be even complete, let alone awesome (which is what it should be).
However, for that precise reason, I think it is more... prudent to reserve judgment for the moment. It will be complete, at the very least.
Hopefully come the end of March you can have 'your i told you so moment' then. In the meantime i'll keep the fire lit in the rage furnaces.
Thanks, but the first 20 questions are either (1) about what I already know, (2) what I don't need to know that desperately, or (3) nonsense.wright1978 wrote...
Gamespot are taking a poll of ME3 questions to ask devs in case people are interested.
http://tinyurl.com/me3poll
wright1978 wrote...
Hopefully come the end of March you can have 'your i told you so moment' then. In the meantime i'll keep the fire lit in the rage furnaces.
Modifié par flemm, 18 janvier 2012 - 09:36 .
How about, keep it lit, but not let it burn out of control... yet.flemm wrote...
wright1978 wrote...
Hopefully come the end of March you can have 'your i told you so moment' then. In the meantime i'll keep the fire lit in the rage furnaces.
Believe me when I say: the fire is lit. Has been lit for some time now. In that sense, I'm right there with you.
But I've taken a close look at what we have, and... I'm no longer sure about a bunch of stuff that seemed really obvious after the leak.
So, the rational side of me thinks we should keep the fire lit, yes, but also wait a bit before burning anything in it.
Or something
That metaphor got a little out of hand
Td1984 wrote...
How about, keep it lit, but not let it burn out of control... yet.
AgitatedLemon wrote...
I'm curious to see if there's any content NOT shown in the leak pertaining to Miranda.
Probably just wishful thinking though.
jtav wrote...
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...
@ Dr. Doctor Do we really say that in ME3?
highlight to view
Yes but it's death dialogue.
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...
jtav wrote...
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...
@ Dr. Doctor Do we really say that in ME3?
highlight to view
Yes but it's death dialogue.
Td1984 wrote...
How about, keep it lit, but not let it burn out of control... yet.flemm wrote...
wright1978 wrote...
Hopefully come the end of March you can have 'your i told you so moment' then. In the meantime i'll keep the fire lit in the rage furnaces.
Believe me when I say: the fire is lit. Has been lit for some time now. In that sense, I'm right there with you.
But I've taken a close look at what we have, and... I'm no longer sure about a bunch of stuff that seemed really obvious after the leak.
So, the rational side of me thinks we should keep the fire lit, yes, but also wait a bit before burning anything in it.
Or something
That metaphor got a little out of hand
When it's time to let it burn out of control, why not both? Let the whole damn galaxy burn.AgitatedLemon wrote...
Td1984 wrote...
How about, keep it lit, but not let it burn out of control... yet.flemm wrote...
wright1978 wrote...
Hopefully come the end of March you can have 'your i told you so moment' then. In the meantime i'll keep the fire lit in the rage furnaces.
Believe me when I say: the fire is lit. Has been lit for some time now. In that sense, I'm right there with you.
But I've taken a close look at what we have, and... I'm no longer sure about a bunch of stuff that seemed really obvious after the leak.
So, the rational side of me thinks we should keep the fire lit, yes, but also wait a bit before burning anything in it.
Or something
That metaphor got a little out of hand
Which is better, gasoline or gun powder?
Retour en haut