Again we come back to the commonality of a name like "Lawson". And I see no reason why Lawson should be well known, to the player or anyone else. With all the things we assume he's doing in pursuit of his legacy keeping his head down and not being an overt mogul helps keep the public eye off him wihout having to resort to a false alias (not that he'd be greatly incovenienced to use one if the need arose).MisterJB wrote...
Logically, of course not. Just like I can't imagine why Shepard didn't imediatelly recognize the surname rather than going "Who exactly is your father?"
Not to mention that revealing her real name to Shepard or anyone he brough aboard whose loyalties to Cerberus were sketchy at best is nonsensical.
It's not just nonsensical, it's also insulting to the fans. They obviously had no clear idea who Miranda's father was supposed to be at the time of ME2. And, when they decided to include him in ME3, they just called him Lawson because they tough revealing that Miranda's name was fake would confuse the fans.
But the biggest offender is that people speculated about who her real father was much like they speculated who the SB or TIM were.
Henry Lawson is no one. He is a completely new character unlike, say, an Eldfell or an Ashland.
We don't even have any clue as to what kind of business the Lawson family runs.
As for using her name in front of Shepard's recruits I don't find it problematic because a)TIM himself already showed Shepard enough trust to talk to him face to face (sort of) and
This really isn't a big deal. I think you're just making too much of it.





Retour en haut






