Last I will say on it. I agree, it's a perfectly acceptable (and interesting) premise. Just the way it is represented and implemented in ME is incredibly flawed.Ieldra2 wrote...
These synthetics are not more intelligent than humans. The short version of "the problem" can be phrased like this: "When an synthetic has been created which is more intelligent than an organic, the age of organics is at its end." From then on, the future will be determined by synthetics, and eventual extinction will result not because of any malice, but because of the same disregard that makes humans on Earth habitually cause the extinction of life forms less intelligent than they are. That, too, needn't necessarily happen, but it's an acceptable premise for a story.
"I'll always want you in my life." Miranda Lawson in Mass Effect 3
#48751
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 07:12
#48752
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 07:14
Awesome work! I vote for the second.
#48753
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 07:22
I'm willing to attribute it to small-minded jealousy and other unfavorable circumstances and give her the benefit of the doubt.
Modifié par CrutchCricket, 01 mai 2012 - 07:26 .
#48754
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 07:26
Yes....but it would have come across as Lovecraftian had they not revealed the Reapers' purpose. The visual presentation made sure of that.CrutchCricket wrote...
...because it is evident to me that there can (and most likely do) exist things too vast for our current forms to comprehend- and I don't mean this in a Lovecraftian way.
And here you have the essence of why I like Synthesis. It represents a step towards this "becoming more".Our perspective as human beings is terribly limited if you step back to take a look. It's based on imagination and our imagination is limited only to what we can experience. It is of course natural to keep wanting to go further. But there is an upper limit to how high the human form can go. We have to change into something more to go higher (not that that would be impossible) But right now, it's beyond the scope of our world or the ME world.
Besides, what I support is a striving towards greater understanding, even if it takes us beyond what we are now, as opposed to accepting or even enforcing the limits of what we are now as borders that should not be crossed. Don't tell me that not revealing the Reapers' purpose would not have come across as the latter. There's enough that remains mysterious about them in a good way, such as the workings of their minds (vast an incomprehensible, says Legion). Also the Catalyst. It says "The Citadel is part of me". So, it consists of more than the Citadel. What are the other parts? Enough unresolved mysteries that the Reapers remain beyond human comprehension.
@all:
Sorry for the OT again, but this is a topic too interesting to just cut off.
#48755
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 07:27
Mr Massakka wrote...
Searching for a way to bring Shepard back, obviously.Ieldra2 wrote...
Hmm...thinking of things Miranda would do after the war. She wouldn't be trusted with any sensitive work by the Alliance, and she has lost every home base she ever had.
If there's any chance of that. But I think she has too much of a sense of duty to humanity to focus on a personal project. Unless it's a real and immediate possibility.
I have to change my earlier stance, btw. I agree with CrutchCrickett that Alliance work with Hackett is quite possible. The man who sent Shepard on the "The Negotiation" mission in ME1 would appreciate her. Her actions regarding Cerberus in ME3 (the email) speak for themselves, and the Crucible project had a lot of people with Miranda's kind of idealism.
While I'm at it, does anyone else like Shepard's line to TIM as much as I do: "Cerberus was supposed to be humanity's sword, not a dagger in its back".
#48756
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 07:27
Either way, good! I dislike confrontation.
I get the feeling MisterJB does.Ieldra2 wrote...
While I'm at it, does anyone else like
Shepard's line to TIM as much as I do: "Cerberus was supposed to be
humanity's sword, not a dagger in its back".
Modifié par hot_heart, 01 mai 2012 - 07:29 .
#48757
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 07:29
I like the style of the first better. I can't give a reason.Aliqaiser wrote...
OK, folks,
Here are 2 of my Idea's of the planets surface, (just different Atmosphere)
I would like you to choose, the one you find most appropriate, the one with the most votes, will get the final touches, I still have alot to do, These are only 50% completed.
Let me know what you think.
http://s1265.photobu...yofThelost6.jpg
and
http://s1265.photobu...yofThelost8.jpg
#48758
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 07:34
What do you expect? I don't like it. Even as I like it, because it's something Ashley would say. But it has underscored why Cyrus Shepard is with Miranda and not Ashley. In fact, given that comment, I'd be hard-pressed to make a maleShep who stays with Ashley. I would have to roleplay very far from myself.Attila 6 wrote...
What do you guys think about when Ashley calling accusing Miranda that she is not a real person ?
#48759
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 07:37
#48760
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 07:41
Not necessarily. We were given enough of a purpose in ME2. They harvest entire species to make more of themselves. That was sufficient to again keep it firmly out of the Lovecraftian area while keeping their ultimate purpose unknowable (and there had to be an ultimate purpose as simple continuity is not enough for a machine). We didn't need to know the ultimate purpose to keep us out of cosmic horror territory and to promote further discovery. The intermediate purpose worked for that just as well.Ieldra2 wrote...
Yes....but it would have come across as Lovecraftian had they not revealed the Reapers' purpose. The visual presentation made sure of that.
Yes, synthesis represents that but like I said that notion is beyond the scope of ME (or at least of this trilogy). It's too complex an idea to introduce so offhandedly and in the last 5 min no less.And here you have the essence of why I like Synthesis. It represents a step towards this "becoming more".
Besides, what I support is a striving towards greater understanding, even if it takes us beyond what we are now, as opposed to accepting or even enforcing the limits of what we are now as borders that should not be crossed. Don't tell me that not revealing the Reapers' purpose would not have come across as the latter. There's enough that remains mysterious about them in a good way, such as the workings of their minds (vast an incomprehensible, says Legion). Also the Catalyst. It says "The Citadel is part of me". So, it consists of more than the Citadel. What are the other parts? Enough unresolved mysteries that the Reapers remain beyond human comprehension.
And yes I will tell you exactly that, that we could've expressed advancement without detailing the ultimate purpose. Ax the holokid and synthesis but keep the basic paths of destroy and control (the latter perhaps achieved by merging with or supplanting the Harbinger consciousness). Shepard is given the choice to ascend to Reaper level where he can finally understand the ultmate purpose even if that is never shown. You can imagine from that what you will.
Modifié par CrutchCricket, 01 mai 2012 - 07:43 .
#48761
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:05
Then I realised; Lawson!
Because of Miranda I might have found my new name.
#48762
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:12
Considering that the only Shep that I romanced Ash with managed to stay loyal to her, I won't be getting that dialogue.Attila 6 wrote...
What do you guys think about when Ashley calling accusing Miranda that she is not a real person ?
#48763
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:18
*points to signature*Ieldra2 wrote...
While I'm at it, does anyone else like Shepard's line to TIM as much as I do: "Cerberus was supposed to be humanity's sword, not a dagger in its back".
Modifié par MisterJB, 01 mai 2012 - 08:19 .
#48764
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:20
...or some other suggestion of your own?
#48765
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:21
When do you get that dialogue?MisterJB wrote...
*points to signature*Ieldra2 wrote...
While I'm at it, does anyone else like Shepard's line to TIM as much as I do: "Cerberus was supposed to be humanity's sword, not a dagger in its back".
Modifié par kratos0294, 01 mai 2012 - 08:44 .
#48766
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:29
Serenity fits with the usual names of Mass Effect bars.hot_heart wrote...
Guys, help! Name for a fictional fancy bar on the Citadel: Chyrs or Serenity?
...or some other suggestion of your own?
#48767
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:45
Agreed :happy:Mr Massakka wrote...
Serenity fits with the usual names of Mass Effect bars.hot_heart wrote...
Guys, help! Name for a fictional fancy bar on the Citadel: Chyrs or Serenity?
...or some other suggestion of your own?
#48768
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:48
Both are on their way to a shuttle.
#48769
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:48
#48770
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:51
Go after Oriana. Leng has a tracerB)MisterJB wrote...
What do you feel about Miranda or Shepard having to choose between pursuing Kai Leng who holds the research done in Sanctuary or Henry Lawson who has Oriana?
Both are on their way to a shuttle.
... Assuming that this is not the case: Go after Kai Leng. Miranda understands that saving the galaxy is more important than her sister. Eitherway, Henry won't kill Oriana. There will be another chance to rescue her after the war is over.
Modifié par Mr Massakka, 01 mai 2012 - 08:56 .
#48771
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 08:52
MisterJB wrote...
What do you feel about Miranda or Shepard having to choose between pursuing Kai Leng who holds the research done in Sanctuary or Henry Lawson who has Oriana?
Both are on their way to a shuttle.
First thought: Yay! I get an actual choice.
Second thought: Yay! I get to kill Oriana.
#48772
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 09:09
#48773
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 09:11
I was waiting for this one.
Thank you, Neeh.
Modifié par MisterJB, 01 mai 2012 - 09:13 .
#48774
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 09:14
#48775
Posté 01 mai 2012 - 09:20





Retour en haut








