That's where these theories come in:flemm wrote...
MisterJB wrote...
I can understand wanting the antagonist to be an incomprehensible cosmic force but, like fleem said, that ship has sailed regarding the Reapers. And I am fine with it, ME should be about humanity rising above the Reapers.
One thing that's really been lost in all this discussion is that what the Reapers do is horrific and brutal. That's yet another big problem with how they have been handled.
If they were treated more as a cosmic force then the inhumanity and brutality becomes a strong point because, well, the universe is inhuman and pretty brutal a lot of the time to organic life. It's the order of things.
But when you start trying to say: these creatures exist for practical reasons, what they do makes sense in rational terms, they are not so different from us, then people will balk at that because then the inhumanity and brutality becomes something you have to account for, just as you would if any other sentient beings were accomplishing these horrific acts.
*On the nature of the Catalyst and the Reapers, and why Synthesis is an attractive choice by me.
*The Truth: the Reapers want Shepard to succeedThe Truth: the Reapers want Shepard to succeed[/url] by JustinElenbaas
Short version: the Reapers are as much victims as servants of the cycle, they're enslaved by the Catalyst, and they're complicit in Shepard's success to some small degree, as much as their "indoctrination" allows them to be. That explains why Harbinger doesn't attack the Normandy.
Oops, top of the page....

As usual, the good Miranda pictures are from ME2.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 08 juillet 2012 - 07:42 .





Retour en haut






