82210 réponses à ce sujet

[MASSEFFECTfanforlife101]

Great. I'm going to end up seeing this movie, though the rest of my family will not be interested. They'll wonder why I wold pick to see this, of all movies, but I'll never say why.

Yvonne was Sarah Walker, then Miranda Lawson, and now, she is a Koala.

I'm not sure if I should "squee" or....idk.

Modifié par MASSEFFECTfanforlife101, 06 août 2012 - 06:19 .

[Taboo]

Luis you won't be seeing it because it won't be coming here. You'll have to import and follow the steps I posted on the last page.

Do you want to it that badly? It could cost one hundred dollars or more.

[jtav]

My God, I thought you were joking about the koala being named Miranda. *dies laughing*

[MASSEFFECTfanforlife101]

Taboo-XX wrote...

Luis you won't be seeing it because it won't be coming here. You'll have to import and follow the steps I posted on the last page.

Do you want to it that badly? It could cost one hundred dollars or more.

Oh....well never mind.

Modifié par MASSEFFECTfanforlife101, 06 août 2012 - 06:28 .

[fiendishchicken]

Taboo-XX wrote...

Luis you won't be seeing it because it won't be coming here. You'll have to import and follow the steps I posted on the last page.

Do you want to it that badly? It could cost one hundred dollars or more.

Besides it looks terrible. I don't understand this fascination with CGI films. Btw, the film is actually South Korean.

[flemm]

jtav wrote...

My God, I thought you were joking about the koala being named Miranda. *dies laughing*

I notice that the Miranda Koala is also a *gray* character.

[MASSEFFECTfanforlife101]

I would like to see Yvonne play the voice of the LEADING Character of a Well-Made/High Budget Animated Film. Come on, Disney or Dreamworks....DO SOMETHING!

[fiendishchicken]

flemm wrote...

jtav wrote...

My God, I thought you were joking about the koala being named Miranda. *dies laughing*

I notice that the Miranda Koala is also a *gray* character.

Modifié par fiendishchicken, 06 août 2012 - 07:07 .

[Taboo]

fiendishchicken wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Luis you won't be seeing it because it won't be coming here. You'll have to import and follow the steps I posted on the last page.

Do you want to it that badly? It could cost one hundred dollars or more.

Besides it looks terrible. I don't understand this fascination with CGI films. Btw, the film is actually South Korean.

Eh, if it was produced with Korean money it's a Korean film. If it was produced with Australian money it's an Australian film. It certainly looked like the production companies were Australian to me. What you have is a co-production. They couldn't get financing from just one source. South Korea does a lot of animation work.

But you've seen this story before, a million times. In fact I'm fairly certain another film looked just like this and it came out a year or so ago...

[fiendishchicken]

MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...

I would like to see Yvonne play the voice of the LEADING Character of a Well-Made/High Budget Animated Film. Come on, Disney or Dreamworks....DO SOMETHING!

You'd see her if she was in a bad porno.

[MASSEFFECTfanforlife101]

I do not want Yvonne to degrade herself to pornography.<_<

Modifié par MASSEFFECTfanforlife101, 06 août 2012 - 06:35 .

[Taboo]

Actually, she has a higher chance of being naked simply because she isn't American. Once you leave the US the clothes start to come off more.

It's not something I'm partial to, as most nudity cannot be justified in context other than titillation, which appears to be what Miss Strahovski is famous for.

If she's ever going to be nude, she'll be nude in Dexter. Bet on it.

Although it probably won't be her unless it's a full body shot.

[MASSEFFECTfanforlife101]

Why would she be nude in Dexter?

Modifié par MASSEFFECTfanforlife101, 06 août 2012 - 06:38 .

[krukow]

MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...

Why would she be nude in Dexter?

So she can get wrapped in plastic and cut into pieces.

It's gonna happen.

It's gonna suck.

[MASSEFFECTfanforlife101]

krukow wrote...

MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...

Why would she be nude in Dexter?

So she can get wrapped in plastic and cut into pieces.

It's gonna happen.

It's gonna suck.

:crying::crying:

[Taboo]

Uh no. She'd be wearing pads on her breasts and groin in that scene.

The audience for the last Season of Dexter was incredibly low. REAL low. I think it may have been the lowest viewership in Showtime's histroy.

They've already played around with a female killer with Julia Stiles and yet only two years later they're bringing in a new one. Why?

Sex appeal. That's what she's known for. She's young, bright, and it's a whole new world. I'm more than certain that she'll be in various states of undress throughout the season. Because it's Showtime they can show a lot more. There are no restrictions on certain things.

In theory she could be right out there with full frontal nudity. I seriously doubt it will come to that point but that's the extreme it could go to.

I think she's a bit more cautious than that, as those pictures would hit the internet so fast the room would spin.

Modifié par Taboo-XX, 06 août 2012 - 06:46 .

[fiendishchicken]

Taboo-XX wrote...

Uh no. She'd be wearing pads on her breasts and groin in that scene.

The audience for the last Season of Dexter was incredibly low. REAL low. I think it may have been the lowest viewership in Showtime's histroy.

They've already played around with a female killer with Julia Stiles and yet only two years later they're bringing in a new one. Why?

Sex appeal. That's what she's known for. She's young, bright, and it's a whole new world. I'm more than certain that she'll be in various states of undress throughout the season. Because it's Showtime they can show a lot more. There are no restrictions on certain things.

In theory she could be right out there with full frontal nudity. I seriously doubt it will come to that point but that's the extreme it could go to.

I think she's a bit more cautious than that, as those pictures would hit the internet so fast the room would spin.

I wouldn't mind if it was tasteful nudity (is there such a thing) that shows off more the beauty of the female body rather than just sex appeal or physical hotness.

Taboo would know more than I do in this case.

[fiendishchicken]

krukow wrote...

MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...

Why would she be nude in Dexter?

So she can get wrapped in plastic and cut into pieces.

It's gonna happen.

It's gonna suck.

I see her being taken out in a more conventional way. Like maybe Jennifer Carpenter shoots her or something.

[krukow]

fiendishchicken wrote...I wouldn't mind if it was tasteful nudity (is there such a thing) that shows off more the beauty of the female body rather than just sex appeal or physical hotness.

Taboo would know more than I do in this case.

In Dexter??  LUL, no.

Dexter makes the original ME3 endings look like art.  That comparison doesn't make sense, but I'm going with it anyways, Dexter is that bad now.

[Caihn]

Stop your speculations, you have no idea what they have decided for her character.

And we really don't care about her being nude or not. 
She's a talented actress who is already esteemed for her professionalism and her personality by her previous and new colleagues.

Modifié par Yannkee, 06 août 2012 - 06:57 .

[fiendishchicken]

krukow wrote...

fiendishchicken wrote...I wouldn't mind if it was tasteful nudity (is there such a thing) that shows off more the beauty of the female body rather than just sex appeal or physical hotness.

Taboo would know more than I do in this case.

In Dexter??  LUL, no.

Dexter makes the original ME3 endings look like art.  That comparison doesn't make sense, but I'm going with it anyways, Dexter is that bad now.

maybe not in Dexter but in some indie film or something.

[hot_heart]

piratewars.deviantart.com/art/Fight-for-the-Lost-210227515

With Yvonne Strahovski, my only concern would be that she is picking 'fun' roles over ones that might help career longevity. I'm not 100% sure on that front, but whatever makes you happy, I guess.

Modifié par hot_heart, 06 août 2012 - 06:58 .

[krukow]

Yannkee wrote...

Stop your speculations, you have no idea what they have decided for her character.

She's a woman on Dexter who's murdered people at some point.

...this only ends one way...

Edit: That is a great poster Hot_Heart!

Modifié par krukow, 06 août 2012 - 06:58 .

[Taboo]

fiendishchicken wrote...

I wouldn't mind if it was tasteful nudity (is there such a thing) that shows off more the beauty of the female body rather than just sex appeal or physical hotness.

Taboo would know more than I do in this case.

Ever share a room with a girl? Is it sexual when she steps out of the shower? No. It's a state of being. She's just been cleaning herself like you do. There is no connotation of sexual anything. Although that doesn't mean it won't lead to anything, THEN it becomes sexual.

The United Kingdom recognizes this, and does not punish films or television that show it. Natural nudity is acceptable in films that are G (Or "U" in their case) here.

I don't really care either way, but I don't see Showtime doing it in that context...for a woman. If there's one thing HBO and Showtime are really bad at, it's showing nudity in a manner that ISN'T grossly sexualized. I remember watching Rome for the first time and being absolutely blown away by how explicit it was. I wasn't offended, but I was certainly amazed at the gall of the producers.

[Caihn]

krukow wrote...

Yannkee wrote...

Stop your speculations, you have no idea what they have decided for her character.

She's a woman on Dexter who's murdered people at some point.

...this only ends one way...

Speculations.