Mr Massakka wrote...
... and I am still waiting for the announcement that makes me "hold onto my ME3 forever".
Guess I was right that this quote was all about random DLC to extend on the mediocre game (rather than fixing something)
Taboo-XX wrote...
To be honest it looks like the DLC is better than quite a bit of the core game. If that's the case perhaps it will balance out the less than satisfactory elements.
It happens.
A "true" Extended Cut.
![=]](https://lvlt.forum.bioware.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sideways.png)
Modifié par flemm, 04 septembre 2012 - 03:31 .
Her future after ME3 with some users strongly opposing Miranda founding a new Black Ops organization to replace Cerberus, future pregnancy where the debates seems to be between those who wish Miranda could find a to naturally conceive and others who wish she creates her progeny the way Henry Lawson created her.oh brother wrote...
@Ieldra - what are the issues? Collector base, and...?
flemm wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
To be honest it looks like the DLC is better than quite a bit of the core game. If that's the case perhaps it will balance out the less than satisfactory elements.
It happens.
A "true" Extended Cut.
Ideally it will work like that.
Though I think the fourth DLC in line is entitled:
"Dreaming of Starbrat"
Probably for all those fans who have been clamoring for more heavy-handed symbolism
MisterJB wrote...
Her future after ME3 with some users strongly opposing Miranda founding a new Black Ops organization to replace Cerberus, future pregnancy where the debates seems to be between those who wish Miranda could find a to naturally conceive and others who wish she creates her progeny the way Henry Lawson created her.oh brother wrote...
@Ieldra - what are the issues? Collector base, and...?
Thing is, it extends on the campaign, continues the legacy... as if it was satisfactory.Taboo-XX wrote...
To be honest it looks like the DLC is better than quite a bit of the core game. If that's the case perhaps it will balance out the less than satisfactory elements.
It happens.
A "true" Extended Cut.
Mr Massakka wrote...
Thing is, it extends on the campaign, continues the legacy... as if it was satisfactory.Taboo-XX wrote...
To be honest it looks like the DLC is better than quite a bit of the core game. If that's the case perhaps it will balance out the less than satisfactory elements.
It happens.
A "true" Extended Cut.
I want the DLC to fix something: Make choices matter, make Shepard role-playable again, include side-lined characters and arcs... not again "You and your awesome ME3 squad get another random mission".
I am just not interested in such stuff. I mean, Leviathan even clarifies the Reapers and I am not interested at all.
I'll list them. Note that this is a tendency. Not everyone will be in the same group on all the issues, but there appears to be a correlation. I'm calling these group I and II for the first and second listed traits, respectively:oh brother wrote...
@Ieldra - what are the issues? Collector base, and...?
Modifié par Ieldra2, 04 septembre 2012 - 03:53 .
Sure, that could work, but honestly? It's blind speculation.Taboo-XX wrote...
Mr Massakka wrote...
Thing is, it extends on the campaign, continues the legacy... as if it was satisfactory.Taboo-XX wrote...
To be honest it looks like the DLC is better than quite a bit of the core game. If that's the case perhaps it will balance out the less than satisfactory elements.
It happens.
A "true" Extended Cut.
I want the DLC to fix something: Make choices matter, make Shepard role-playable again, include side-lined characters and arcs... not again "You and your awesome ME3 squad get another random mission".
I am just not interested in such stuff. I mean, Leviathan even clarifies the Reapers and I am not interested at all.
The thing is is that if it expands upon things that needed to be and rectifies some mistakes it may make flaws less apparent.
I'm trying to think of a comparison to make but I'm unsure about what to say. I'm sure you know who Wim Wenders is but others won't so I'll use something else.
There was a film in 1976 called Novecento with Robert De Niro that ran 315 minutes uncut. When it first came to the United States it was cut down to about 245 minutes.
It ruined the film. Plots became unclear and the film was just a mess. Looking at the longest extant version now (it's been restored to it's full length) I can say it's a pretty good film but still flawed.
If Bioware plays there cards right they may end up with something like that.
Modifié par Taboo-XX, 04 septembre 2012 - 03:56 .
fiendishchicken wrote...
Mr Massakka wrote...
... and I am still waiting for the announcement that makes me "hold onto my ME3 forever".
Guess I was right that this quote was all about random DLC to extend on the mediocre game (rather than fixing something)
It probably doesn't mean much. We've probably already seen more than half of the DLC scheduled anyway.
I would mind more MP though. It does give it a little bit more replayability.
Mr Massakka wrote...
Sure, that could work, but honestly? It's blind speculation.
They haven't shown anything that goes into that direction yet and my blind faith in something positive from BioWare decreased to near zero since ME3.
Tell me. Can be in a PM if you don't want to bring it up in the public, but I want to know.Taboo-XX wrote...
Oh God I was hoping one of those would never come up. One of those plays into some terrible things. And it's not the one you think it is.
V or the W complex.
Oh the humanity Ieldra.
Keep that **** quiet.
Then they will have to scratch very deep to fix a significant amount of issues.Taboo-XX wrote...
Mr Massakka wrote...
Sure, that could work, but honestly? It's blind speculation.
They haven't shown anything that goes into that direction yet and my blind faith in something positive from BioWare decreased to near zero since ME3.
Both Story related DLC's have done nothing but fix some of the issues. If Bioware stays this way it might fix some issues.
But some will never go away. The game will always be flawed.
The Auto-Dialouge already in the game is here to stay.
Modifié par Mr Massakka, 04 septembre 2012 - 04:10 .
Modifié par oh brother, 04 septembre 2012 - 04:11 .
Modifié par Taboo-XX, 04 septembre 2012 - 04:10 .
jtav wrote...
I see the commonality. One group wishes Miranda to be "normal" insofar as the idea exists. There's a strong traditionalist streak. The other wishes Miranda to buck convention as far as characterization allows.
Steelcan wrote...
Did I miss something?
Modifié par Taboo-XX, 04 septembre 2012 - 04:29 .
Modifié par Yannkee, 04 septembre 2012 - 04:30 .
. Agreed, but I'm still confused as to what's going on:?Yannkee wrote...
There are no groups among the fanbase, only people with different opinions.
Personally, I'm part of no group, I just like the character I've seen from the begining of ME2 to the end ME3 (even if I hate the fact that the character was sidelined).
I have my own interpretation about some things, but this interpretation is no better than others.
Steelcan wrote...
Agreed, but I'm still confused as to what's going on[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/uncertain.png[/smilie]
Yannkee wrote...
There are no groups among the fanbase, only people with different opinions.
Personally, I'm part of no group, I just like the character I've seen from the begining of ME2 to the end ME3 (even if I hate the fact that the character was sidelined).
I have my own interpretation about some things, but this interpretation is no better than others.
Modifié par oh brother, 04 septembre 2012 - 04:35 .
No, it's a majority trait, nothing more. Basically you're claiming there are no true non-comformists and individualists out there. That's very debatable. Also, people might want to be accepted, but by who? That varies considerably. Certainly not by everyone.Taboo-XX wrote...
Certain things are inherent in people. People want to fit in and be accepted. This is science fact and is not debatable.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 04 septembre 2012 - 04:38 .
Retour en haut