Ieldra2 wrote...
I'm sorry, but "That's unhealthy" is ONE possible response. Not mine. Also, she never expresses a preference, except with her sister and Shepard. If she doesn't see a problem, I don't see why I should insist it is one. Really, the level of loathing I have for this kind of assumption cannot be expressed in words. It's just the same kind of thinking that says Miranda softening up means "humanizing" her. Staying distanced is just as human, damn it, and it's not better or worse than being the gregarious type. DAMN IT!
Having a small group of people that one cares deeply about, and being relatively distant otherwise is healthy, certainly at least as healthy as being defined entirely by superficial gregariousness.
*Not* running with the crowd all the time, and being defined constantly by the lowest common denominator, is a good thing, for example, and that's not something one can attain if one is afraid of being seen as a little aloof and distant at times.
Anyway, ultimately, yes, that is part of the issue with how Miranda is written in ME3, as opposed to how Weekes wrote her in 2. Basically, Weekes correctly saw Miranda's "big picture" focus as a good thing, but also something that needed to be tempered by a more personal connection that is undervalued at the start.
Jay's perception was far too simplistic: everything associated with Miranda's professional side was bad in his mind, only the personal connection was good. I say "was" his perception, because that's how he saw it when he wrote the role, one can hope his perception has evolved by now.
Modifié par flemm, 13 septembre 2012 - 07:25 .