lillitheris wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
Retconned that way
Your argument is that ME, released 2 years before ME2, was ‘retconned’ to…what is your argument?
Possibly the various retcons are getting lost a bit in the shuffle of the discussion. It's probably worth going back over some of this.
In ME1, Cerberus was a terrorist/extremist/xenophobic organisation of minor importance and influence, engaged in the type of relatively small-scale bombings, assassinations, etc. that one might associate with such a fringe organisation.
In ME2, Cerberus is revealed to function like a rogue black ops organisation, with the cutting edge technology, strong ties to the Alliance military and "big picture" objectives, such as defending colonies, defeating the Collectors, and eventually the Reapers, that one would associate with that type of organisation (but not with the fringe group from ME1).
In ME3, Cerberus works like the Sith, where basically everybody is a drone except the Emperor and his henchman, and the goal is galactic domination (something the ME1 organisation couldn't aspire to at all).
Certain characters, especially Miranda, only really make sense from the point of view of the ME2 portrayal, but they do make sense from that point of view.
The idea that what we see in ME2 is just a front is, of course, a retcon, and only possible from the point of view of ME3 Cerberus, *not* from the point of view of the ME1 fringe organisation. A organisation like that could never "pose" as a group responsable for the Lazarus Project, or create such a "front."
The organisation's cell structure (which, as I can recall, is really only dealt with in ME2), is a function of its nature as a covert black ops organisation. But there's really no mystery as to why people in the ME universe might join ME2 Cerberus: all the reasons that are *explained* by the people working for ME2 Cerberus.