lillitheris wrote...
I disagree, I think several people assert exactly that. Almost in the exact words, too.
No. The only one who has articulated that point of view is you. Several times.
At best it is a sort of caricature or over-simplification of one point that a few people have made, as part of a larger argument, with regard to Cerberus' cell structure.
The reason you argue against a simplistic view that only you have presented is because that view is easy to contest, whereas the ones actually presented by the people you are talking to are not.
This is the very definition of a Straw Man:
A straw man is a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position.
Modifié par flemm, 20 septembre 2012 - 05:26 .