Aller au contenu

Photo

"I'll always want you in my life." Miranda Lawson in Mass Effect 3


82210 réponses à ce sujet

#79001
hot_heart

hot_heart
  • Members
  • 2 682 messages

fiendishchicken wrote...
Are you some kind of Femi****? Honestly, your stuff is wtf worthy in nearly every post. What exactly do you want?

Dude, I understand you're passionate, but I don't think it's nice to label and attack others just because they share a different opinion.

jtav may not be offended, but I don't think it gives off a good impression to others.

EDIT: Hey, page snipe.
Image IPB

Modifié par hot_heart, 24 septembre 2012 - 04:56 .


#79002
Skullheart

Skullheart
  • Members
  • 4 345 messages
Mmmm... one more problem I had with the jay w: he didn't write Miranda, he just tried to write her.

#79003
lillitheris

lillitheris
  • Members
  • 5 332 messages

Steelcan wrote...

 The most likely scenario.  Unfortunately I detest the romances from ME1.  So for those of us who d not worship Liara, and I'd not romance Ashley or Kaidan, we get a screw you from BW


Liara has the least romance-specific content, so…

(Also glad to see how you, like, totally weren’t trying to troll in the Liara tread…)

#79004
hot_heart

hot_heart
  • Members
  • 2 682 messages

lillitheris wrote...
Liara has the least romance-specific content, so…

You sure about that one?

#79005
jtav

jtav
  • Members
  • 13 965 messages
Of team members, yes. To the point of comedy because even a romanced Liara will talk about what good friends you are with the lock in being "friends doesn't cut it."

I'd say the "intended" path was Ash (ME1) Miranda (ME2) Liara (ME3)

#79006
krukow

krukow
  • Members
  • 3 943 messages

jtav wrote...

Of team members, yes. To the point of comedy because even a romanced Liara will talk about what good friends you are with the lock in being "friends doesn't cut it."

I'd say the "intended" path was Ash (ME1) Miranda (ME2) Liara (ME3)


I don't think there was an "intended path", so much as the major romances.  The three from ME1 were all equal, ME2 was MIranda/Jack/Jacob, and ME 3 went back to the original 3 (as evidenced by the original game-ending slides).

#79007
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 358 messages

lillitheris wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

 The most likely scenario.  Unfortunately I detest the romances from ME1.  So for those of us who d not worship Liara, and I'd not romance Ashley or Kaidan, we get a screw you from BW


Liara has the least romance-specific content, so…

(Also glad to see how you, like, totally weren’t trying to troll in the Liara tread…)

. First of all Liara is basically shoved down our throats in ME3.  And as or the thread.  I asked a question and everyone flipped out.

#79008
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 358 messages

krukow wrote...

jtav wrote...

Of team members, yes. To the point of comedy because even a romanced Liara will talk about what good friends you are with the lock in being "friends doesn't cut it."

I'd say the "intended" path was Ash (ME1) Miranda (ME2) Liara (ME3)


I don't think there was an "intended path", so much as the major romances.  The three from ME1 were all equal, ME2 was MIranda/Jack/Jacob, and ME 3 went back to the original 3 (as evidenced by the original game-ending slides).

. Having to see Liara in the flashbacks:sick::sick::sick:

#79009
krukow

krukow
  • Members
  • 3 943 messages

Steelcan wrote...

krukow wrote...

jtav wrote...

Of team members, yes. To the point of comedy because even a romanced Liara will talk about what good friends you are with the lock in being "friends doesn't cut it."

I'd say the "intended" path was Ash (ME1) Miranda (ME2) Liara (ME3)


I don't think there was an "intended path", so much as the major romances.  The three from ME1 were all equal, ME2 was MIranda/Jack/Jacob, and ME 3 went back to the original 3 (as evidenced by the original game-ending slides).

. Having to see Liara in the flashbacks:sick::sick::sick:


You know that's who your shepard really loves.  Don't deny it!  SuperMac has ruled on this!

#79010
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 358 messages

krukow wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

krukow wrote...

jtav wrote...
Of team members, yes. To the point of comedy because even a romanced Liara will talk about what good friends you are with the lock in being "friends doesn't cut it."

I'd say the "intended" path was Ash (ME1) Miranda (ME2) Liara (ME3)


I don't think there was an "intended path", so much as the major romances.  The three from ME1 were all equal, ME2 was MIranda/Jack/Jacob, and ME 3 went back to the original 3 (as evidenced by the original game-ending slides).

. Having to see Liara in the flashbacks:sick::sick::sick:


You know that's who your shepard really loves.  Don't deny it!  SuperMac has ruled on this!

. If I could would have killed Liara off in my play through.

Modifié par Steelcan, 24 septembre 2012 - 06:38 .


#79011
ghost9191

ghost9191
  • Members
  • 2 287 messages
"the word makes its demands. and it demands obedience"

#79012
hot_heart

hot_heart
  • Members
  • 2 682 messages

krukow wrote...
I don't think there was an "intended path", so much as the major romances.

Yeah, I don't think there's any 'conspiracy'. The game was rushed, therefore, they made the decision to put a little more into the party characters. It's partly why everyone's got tweaked scenes rather than completely exclusive ones, really.

Also, this really isn't productive discussion anyway, so best to drop it, I figure.

#79013
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

wright1978 wrote...
Overlapping romance-non romance content makes sense from a resource usage standpoint.
Bloating her content wih filler does not. It either suggests a junior writer writing very poorly or for her tragic story arc reasons they were keen to keep her removed from her major ties to the Cerberus arc.


You have no proof other than what's in your head. There is zero intention to do anything.  You're looking for any proof you can at this point. I apologize for being blunt but you need to understand you're beginning to sound like the IT people.

People just can't accept that it's simply bad. Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad.

There is no need to Look Back in Anger when thinking about this.

#79014
wright1978

wright1978
  • Members
  • 8 116 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

wright1978 wrote...
Overlapping romance-non romance content makes sense from a resource usage standpoint.
Bloating her content wih filler does not. It either suggests a junior writer writing very poorly or for her tragic story arc reasons they were keen to keep her removed from her major ties to the Cerberus arc.


You have no proof other than what's in your head. There is zero intention to do anything.  You're looking for any proof you can at this point. I apologize for being blunt but you need to understand you're beginning to sound like the IT people.

People just can't accept that it's simply bad. Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad.

There is no need to Look Back in Anger when thinking about this.


And you have no proof either. All we have is the evidence on which to speculate. I repeatedly mention that it may be sheer appalling writing but i equally see that it could be a desire to aim her at tragic fate to which her Cerberus ties were an inconvenience.

#79015
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
As Ieldra and I discussed yesterday there is only YOUR canon. There is nothing else.

There is lots and lots of porn in the Alliance's future.

And because of hot_heart plenty a crude sex joke.

Rubbing off? Come off it.

Oh God that sounds even worse.

#79016
krukow

krukow
  • Members
  • 3 943 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

There is lots and lots of porn in the Alliance's future.


Tha hell?

#79017
Skullheart

Skullheart
  • Members
  • 4 345 messages
There is super mac canon.

#79018
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

wright1978 wrote...
And you have no proof either. All we have is the evidence on which to speculate. I repeatedly mention that it may be sheer appalling writing but i equally see that it could be a desire to aim her at tragic fate to which her Cerberus ties were an inconvenience.


In the abscene of evidence the most likely answer is "no". That's science. Real world things.

The burden of proof is on you, not me. You can provide none, therefore the point is moot.

#79019
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

krukow wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

There is lots and lots of porn in the Alliance's future.


Tha hell?


Yes. When taking the money from her father's bank account I suggested leaving all of Joker's porn for them to find.

Shepard has rubbed off on Miranda you see.

#79020
flemm

flemm
  • Members
  • 5 786 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...
You have no proof other than what's in your head. There is zero intention to do anything.  You're looking for any proof you can at this point. I apologize for being blunt but you need to understand you're beginning to sound like the IT people.

People just can't accept that it's simply bad. Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad.


Proving a point like that isn't a requirement. Obviously the content is the result of choices made by the people involved in creating it. Consumers aren't a part of that process, but can still have opinions on why certain choices were made.

If anything, the insistance that the content can't/wasn't supposed to really mean anything, is lazy, is just bad, etc., reflects more poorly on it than anything.
 
Having said that, I don't contest the idea that it is bad. "Why" is more of a moot point, really, in the long run.

Modifié par flemm, 24 septembre 2012 - 07:27 .


#79021
krukow

krukow
  • Members
  • 3 943 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...
Yes. When taking the money from her father's bank account I suggested leaving all of Joker's porn for them to find.

Shepard has rubbed off on Miranda you see.


For starters, that was EDI's idea, not Shepard's.  So EDI has apparently rubbed off on Miranda.

And since you all turned the "rubbed off" into a sexual joke...

Image IPB

#79022
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
Man it's really hard not to make a joke out of that isn't it? I didn't see it before but I do now.

#79023
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

krukow wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...
Yes. When taking the money from her father's bank account I suggested leaving all of Joker's porn for them to find.

Shepard has rubbed off on Miranda you see.


For starters, that was EDI's idea, not Shepard's.  So EDI has apparently rubbed off on Miranda.

And since you all turned the "rubbed off" into a sexual joke...

Image IPB


Miranda wouldn't know about it.

EDI is also...dead so it's kind of difficult to do anything from her end.

THE ART.

#79024
wright1978

wright1978
  • Members
  • 8 116 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

wright1978 wrote...
And you have no proof either. All we have is the evidence on which to speculate. I repeatedly mention that it may be sheer appalling writing but i equally see that it could be a desire to aim her at tragic fate to which her Cerberus ties were an inconvenience.


In the abscene of evidence the most likely answer is "no". That's science. Real world things.

The burden of proof is on you, not me. You can provide none, therefore the point is moot.


The content is the evidence. Scientists theorise based on what they see.

#79025
krukow

krukow
  • Members
  • 3 943 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

krukow wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...
Yes. When taking the money from her father's bank account I suggested leaving all of Joker's porn for them to find.

Shepard has rubbed off on Miranda you see.


For starters, that was EDI's idea, not Shepard's.  So EDI has apparently rubbed off on Miranda.

And since you all turned the "rubbed off" into a sexual joke...

Image IPB


Miranda wouldn't know about it.

EDI is also...dead so it's kind of difficult to do anything from her end.

THE ART.


Nope, Miri was bi-curious with EDI before she died. 

It's my canon because you said so.