Careful, else you'll come across like clennonjtav wrote...
I choose Control. My problems with Synthesis boil down to narrative inconsistency rather than ethics. I hate Destroy with the burning heat of a thousand suns.
Ieldra2 wrote...
That wasn't what I meant. I wanted a decision about the data, but it would not have involved betraying Miranda or not. The main Miranda-related decision would've been to make her take over Cronos Station and what remains of Cerberus destroy it all.
lol, excellent.Dr. Doctor wrote...
I like the concept of Synthesis but I think it would work better if it was just Shepard becoming synthesized instead of all life everywhere suddenly being changed at the molecular level. Then the epilogue could hint at the potential for others to join Shepard (similar to the JC Denton ending of Deus Ex: Invisible War)
I'm not opposed to the idea of Destroy it's just that it's a bit of a pain when there's a conversation about Control or Synthesis and someone comes in with "Y U NO CHOOSE DESTROY?!". We get it, you like that option. The other thing is that in the entire time that the Crucible was constructed nobody thought to write an operations manual or at least breif Shepard on how the thing was thought to be set off?:
Alliance Medical Center, Lowell City, Mars
Miranda: You do know that there was an activation icon for the Crucible.
Shepard: I didn't notice it, blood loss must have been messing with my head.
Miranda: Really? Shooting out a capacitor that was designed to store ten gigawatts of energy seems like more of an effort than touching an icon.
Shepard: That's what I get for listening to the kid.
Miranda: What kid?
Shepard: The one that told me what the Crucible could do. Said it was the intelligence that guided the Reapers and it lived in the Citadel or something like that. Everything after running to that beam is hazy, I have no if what I saw there was real or just some kind of dream.
kratos0294 wrote...
lol, excellent.Dr. Doctor wrote...
I like the concept of Synthesis but I think it would work better if it was just Shepard becoming synthesized instead of all life everywhere suddenly being changed at the molecular level. Then the epilogue could hint at the potential for others to join Shepard (similar to the JC Denton ending of Deus Ex: Invisible War)
I'm not opposed to the idea of Destroy it's just that it's a bit of a pain when there's a conversation about Control or Synthesis and someone comes in with "Y U NO CHOOSE DESTROY?!". We get it, you like that option. The other thing is that in the entire time that the Crucible was constructed nobody thought to write an operations manual or at least breif Shepard on how the thing was thought to be set off?:
Alliance Medical Center, Lowell City, Mars
Miranda: You do know that there was an activation icon for the Crucible.
Shepard: I didn't notice it, blood loss must have been messing with my head.
Miranda: Really? Shooting out a capacitor that was designed to store ten gigawatts of energy seems like more of an effort than touching an icon.
Shepard: That's what I get for listening to the kid.
Miranda: What kid?
Shepard: The one that told me what the Crucible could do. Said it was the intelligence that guided the Reapers and it lived in the Citadel or something like that. Everything after running to that beam is hazy, I have no if what I saw there was real or just some kind of dream.
Who knows, maybe Shepard was under substances during the end
Would explain a lot.
Sable Rhapsody wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
That wasn't what I meant. I wanted a decision about the data, but it would not have involved betraying Miranda or not. The main Miranda-related decision would've been to make her take over Cronos Station and what remains of Cerberus destroy it all.
Miranda can handle Cerberus until she needs the cavalry to storm Cronos Station. I'll deal with the Reapers.
Modifié par MASSEFFECTfanforlife101, 29 septembre 2012 - 03:24 .
Miranda´s hot! <3fiendishchicken wrote...
No post for 5 hours. Something is wrong here.
Debate!
Ghost1017 wrote...
I have lemons.
fiendishchicken wrote...
Ghost1017 wrote...
I have lemons.
That's a fight I'd love to see!
katcrave wrote...
fiendishchicken wrote...
katcrave wrote...
The ultimate fight for me would be between these 5 ladies (who are my 5 favorite fictional female characters as well. And my favorite actress of course.):
Coming in at #1 is the perfect Australian woman Miranda Lawson of course. Played by the lovely Miss Yvonne Strahovski, as you all know.
[snip]
At #2 is the beautiful and dangerous Agent Sarah Walker, CIA. Again portrayed by Miss Strahovski
[snip]
P.S. Sorry I'm ultra bored right now. And I feel like an obsessed fanboy. I need some beer.
fiendishchicken wrote...
katcrave wrote...
The ultimate fight for me would be between these 5 ladies (who are my 5 favorite fictional female characters as well. And my favorite actress of course.):
Coming in at #1 is the perfect Australian woman Miranda Lawson of course. Played by the lovely Miss Yvonne Strahovski from Down Under, as you all know.
At #2 is the warm, sexy, and dangerous Agent Sarah Walker, CIA. Again portrayed by Miss Strahovski
P.S. Sorry I'm ultra bored right now. And I feel like an obsessed fanboy. I need some beer.
Modifié par fiendishchicken, 29 septembre 2012 - 07:32 .
Started watching BSG recently, and I like Starbuck. I don't actually find her attractive (not that she isn't) but I like the character. I think the best moment I've seen so far is when she punches Lee and he just straight up socks her one right back.katcrave wrote...
Miranda, Starbuck (BSG), Bastilla, Sarah Walker, Lt. Ellen Ripely.
fiendishchicken wrote...
Damn. I come back after 9 hours and this place is still on the same page...
Please tell me we're not fizzing out.
Retour en haut
