Oh, agreed with ME3. BioWare is way too proud of their game.fiendishchicken wrote...
Mr Massakka wrote...
A 2-sided medal.BP93 wrote...
Speaking of how ME3 was screwed up:Chris Priestly @BioEvilChris
Hey! Fellow gamers. RE6 a combined 0.4 user score? No one is taking you seriously anymore when you review bomb a game like this.
Oh...the irony. Silly gamers, we should just buy off IGN and get a favorable review instead. Amirite?
And hate to break it to you Taboo, but Shepard is totally staring at her cleavage in that picture.
- It definitely doesn't deserve a 0. No game does.
- If it would have been rated 5/10 what it maybe actually deserves, the rating wouldn't have that much impact. Less pressure from the dissappointed fans.
Varmint Shooter '98 begs to differ.
That said, ME3 is not a 10/10 game. Bioware needs to let their ego go. Actually, outside of ME, I don't care anymore, they're not getting another dime from me.
Any future game by them I play will be bought used or borrowed. Or stolen/pirated.
But I won't sink to that level.
However, Chris already stated: "The guy who says it is bad, explains why and rates it a 3 is FAR better than a 0 score saying "this sux so bad. Total fail. Trololol"" and that I can agree with.
The question that remains at the developer is, if you accept these 0 reviews as a clear message from the fans, or write it off as some trolling you can ignore.
Modifié par Mr Massakka, 03 octobre 2012 - 05:40 .





Retour en haut




