Aahhhh.....one of my favorites.SpaceinMind wrote...
Can never have too much Miranda...
"I'll always want you in my life." Miranda Lawson in Mass Effect 3
#10126
Posté 22 août 2011 - 07:18
#10127
Posté 22 août 2011 - 07:20
Ieldra2 wrote...
Aahhhh.....one of my favorites.SpaceinMind wrote...
Can never have too much Miranda...
*snip*
Mine as well, she looks exceptionally beautiful in this one.
Modifié par SpaceinMind, 22 août 2011 - 07:20 .
#10128
Posté 22 août 2011 - 07:30
He would do it if it turned out Shepard couldn't be brought back without Reaper tech. If he really thinks Shepard is irreplaceable, that makes sense. No arrrogance about it. I still hope it isn't true though. Bad enough that Shepard has cybernetic parts enough that a VI can hack him and influence his perceptions, we don't need Reaper artifacts added to the mix.flemm wrote...
What makes it likely? I think its pretty unlikely, knowing what TIM knows about Reaper indoctrination, that he would allow the person being brought back to fight them to be implanted with this dangerous tech.
Well, there is a certain arrogance about the man. A certain hubris, one might even say. So, he would do it thinking the technology could be mastered. And he might be right, but perhaps only to a point. Clearly, he sees Reaper tech as potentially the way to defeat the Reapers (Collector Base decision, dead Reaper husk), and there is even a certain logic to that notion.
Apart from that, I agree with TIM insofar that understanding the Reaper's technology (if not necessarily using it ourselves) is a necessary condition for a decisive victory. But that's another topic.
#10129
Posté 22 août 2011 - 08:09
This one is from Jack RM. Even if i can't see miri too much, i like the kind of' 'action' that can be apreciated.

And here's something from the shuttle.
Modifié par Skullheart, 22 août 2011 - 08:10 .
#10130
Posté 22 août 2011 - 08:21
Ieldra2 wrote...
@nitefyre:
Yes, I hate the infertility as well. I have put together several reasons why it should be reversible or circumventable rather easily. Refer to the Miranda Lawson FAQ. It's a little outdated now with the new information about ME3, but the reasoning about the infertility stands.
I don't hate per say as more of - "Holy ****" that kinda sucks for her character given how she was brought into the world its actually pretty plausable . Still I like all the info I found out in the Shadow Broker Lair its cool to see some of the all the cast outside of what you see in the game ... and Like I theorized early on ... Leigon and EDI I knew it.
#10131
Posté 22 août 2011 - 08:33
#10132
Posté 22 août 2011 - 09:00
It isn't. There is no reason why a genetically engineered woman should be "perfect" in everything else but flawed in the one thing that could perpetuate that "perfection", of all things. It's just a common trope, or rather a combination of them, a fallout of science often being seen as bad if it touches the stuff of life. I don't need to mention that I hate that combination of tropes, right? It's especially annoying that it's applied to Miranda since genetic engineering is so common in Alliance space. Miranda's creation wouldn't even fall under the Sudham-Wolcott Genetic Heritage Act of 2161 - she doesn't have any completely new, so far non-human traits. Her enhancements can be said to be desirable for everyone.nitefyre410 wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
@nitefyre:
Yes, I hate the infertility as well. I have put together several reasons why it should be reversible or circumventable rather easily. Refer to the Miranda Lawson FAQ. It's a little outdated now with the new information about ME3, but the reasoning about the infertility stands.
I don't hate per say as more of - "Holy ****" that kinda sucks for her character given how she was brought into the world its actually pretty plausable.
BTW, that's also the reason why I think Miranda should come to embrace what she is instead of rejecting herself because of it. That her father damaged her self-esteem with his emotional abuse is the main thing I'd like to call him out for.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 22 août 2011 - 09:04 .
#10133
Posté 22 août 2011 - 10:05
Ieldra2 wrote...
Won't happen. At least it will be an avoidable option. Recall how Casey Hudson answered to a question about romance conclusions? "We have pretty much everything covered". If "everything" doesn't cover the most-wanted scenarios where Shepard and his/her LI survive, I'd be extremely surprised.hhh89 wrote...
I really hope not. I have a brother who'll play ME3, he'll be pissed if I break the CD.Mr Plow wrote...
oh God - if it's something like Shepard has Reaper tech in him and the only way to stop the Reapers is that Shepard has to interface/join with the Reaper Failsafe Device and sacrifice himself
snip
I know that there will be various options to finish the game, but I'd like to try in one playtrough to make Shepard sacrifice himself against the Reapers. But if this type of epilogue his linked to the theory that Mr Plow posted, I'll never try it.
#10134
Posté 22 août 2011 - 10:40
Though it didn't happen to Shepard, Elyvern's post-Reapers fanfic Degrees of Inheritance features something very similar as one thing that was necessary to defeat the Reapers. Posting the link here since this is also one of the best MIranda-themed fanfics in existence. Chapter 6 (of 7) is currently in the works.hhh89 wrote...
I know that there will be various options to finish the game, but I'd like to try in one playtrough to make Shepard sacrifice himself against the Reapers. But if this type of epilogue his linked to the theory that Mr Plow posted, I'll never try it.Ieldra2 wrote...
Won't happen. At least it will be an avoidable option. Recall how Casey Hudson answered to a question about romance conclusions? "We have pretty much everything covered". If "everything" doesn't cover the most-wanted scenarios where Shepard and his/her LI survive, I'd be extremely surprised.hhh89 wrote...
I really hope not. I have a brother who'll play ME3, he'll be pissed if I break the CD.Mr Plow wrote...
oh God - if it's something like Shepard has Reaper tech in him and the only way to stop the Reapers is that Shepard has to interface/join with the Reaper Failsafe Device and sacrifice himself
snip
#10135
Posté 22 août 2011 - 10:55
#10136
Posté 22 août 2011 - 11:15
#10137
Posté 22 août 2011 - 11:20
But... that wont happen. He's got super model space babes to worry about, sif he's interested in cybernetic space valkyrie's (Too Human flashes!)
#10138
Posté 22 août 2011 - 11:23
#10139
Posté 22 août 2011 - 11:26
#10140
Posté 22 août 2011 - 11:31
He would do it if it turned out Shepard couldn't be brought back without Reaper tech. If he really thinks Shepard is irreplaceable, that makes sense.
Regardless of the perceived arrogance or stupidity of the gesture, the point being: it's potentially in character for TIM to use Reaper tech to ressurrect Shepard.
#10141
Posté 22 août 2011 - 11:43
Arijharn wrote...
All one step closer in your master plan to get into TIM's pants?
But... that wont happen. He's got super model space babes to worry about, sif he's interested in cybernetic space valkyrie's (Too Human flashes!)
Oh she'll end up with TIM no question about it and If Miranda turns her back on him and Cerberus in ME3 then things will be getting very ugly for her...
#10142
Posté 22 août 2011 - 11:46
I would like to think so, you know....but "The only things I can take credit for are my mistakes" is rather indicative, especially since apparently the usually clear-thinking Miranda doesn't realize how wrong she is when she says that.Arijharn wrote...
I don't think Mr. 'Lawson' has really damaged her self-esteem at all really. She may have doubts due to her creation and therefore her 'place in the world,' but at the same time she's very confident, and confidence I think is a pretty hard thing to 'fake.'
@Seboist:
How will you manage that with the way Cerberus is set up in ME3?
@Arijharn:
ME3 has a new lighting system? Where did you get that information?
Modifié par Ieldra2, 22 août 2011 - 11:48 .
#10143
Posté 22 août 2011 - 11:51
Ieldra2 wrote...
I would like to think so, you know....but "The only things I can take credit for are my mistakes" is rather indicative, especially since apparently the usually clear-thinking Miranda doesn't realize how wrong she is when she says that.Arijharn wrote...
I don't think Mr. 'Lawson' has really damaged her self-esteem at all really. She may have doubts due to her creation and therefore her 'place in the world,' but at the same time she's very confident, and confidence I think is a pretty hard thing to 'fake.'
@Seboist:
How will you manage that with the way Cerberus is set up in ME3?
I haven't a freaking clue but i'll find a way. I'll be playing through ME3 with my ambivalent to Cerberus canon Shepard first.
I'm very worried with how Cerberus and TIM will be portrayed in ME3. Miranda not supporting keeping the base and those who did making a complete 180 were very bad omens of what's to come...
#10144
Posté 22 août 2011 - 11:59
Ieldra2 wrote...
Why would you think that? I hope you're right, but I can't see a reason to say is relatively safe but not the others.jtav wrote...
I think Miranda is relatively safe from being indoctrinated. VS and Liara not so much.
Meta-reasoing. Do you think they'd use something as dramatic as "indoctrinated squad member" on someone who isn't alive in all games? Besides it should theoreticakky hurt more to lose someone you've known since ME1.
#10145
Posté 22 août 2011 - 01:05
Arijharn wrote...
I don't think Mr. 'Lawson' has really damaged her self-esteem at all really. She may have doubts due to her creation and therefore her 'place in the world,' but at the same time she's very confident, and confidence I think is a pretty hard thing to 'fake.'
Confidence and Self-Esteem are two different things - One ties to how well one believes they can do something and the other ties to ones value in oneself
She is very confident in her abilites but her self esteem actually rather low because she see's herself as nothing of a tool - a means to end. Listen to how she speaks of the herself she talks as if she is selling herself as a Luxury car.
#10146
Posté 22 août 2011 - 01:12
jtav wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
Why would you think that? I hope you're right, but I can't see a reason to say is relatively safe but not the others.jtav wrote...
I think Miranda is relatively safe from being indoctrinated. VS and Liara not so much.
Meta-reasoing. Do you think they'd use something as dramatic as "indoctrinated squad member" on someone who isn't alive in all games? Besides it should theoreticakky hurt more to lose someone you've known since ME1.
Hmmm....that makes sense
*strokes chin thoughtfully*
Doing it to your LI would be quite the kick in the pants
#10147
Posté 22 août 2011 - 01:22
Meta-reasoing. Do you think they'd use something as dramatic as "indoctrinated squad member" on someone who isn't alive in all games?
You could be right, but I'm not sure. I think it would depend more on what is planned for new (non-import) games. Logically, since everyone is appearing in the game, everyone will be alive in a new game. That's the most efficient use of resources, it's unlikely that BW would have all these different voice actors come in for a certain number of imported games only. Doubly so since a lot of imported games will want to do the SM "correctly" in any event.
Decimating the squad takes a lot of effort or negligence, so the game is unlikely to be designed with that primarily in mind. More likely the design starts with everyone in the game, and then adjusts for absent squad members in imported games.
With that in mind, I would think that no one is really safe. They are not necessarily going to have lots of characters making generic and bland appearances, where nothing significant happens to them. The game can always revert to "that character is dead" mode, whatever happens.
Modifié par flemm, 22 août 2011 - 01:26 .
#10148
Posté 22 août 2011 - 01:24
That reasoning only holds if the premise is "indoctrinate someone". But what if it's part of a certain character's story arc. I'd say it would more likely be an element of Miranda's story arc than an element of another's. Which makes me worry since I do not want it to be.jtav wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
Why would you think that? I hope you're right, but I can't see a reason to say is relatively safe but not the others.jtav wrote...
I think Miranda is relatively safe from being indoctrinated. VS and Liara not so much.
Meta-reasoing. Do you think they'd use something as dramatic as "indoctrinated squad member" on someone who isn't alive in all games? Besides it should theoreticakky hurt more to lose someone you've known since ME1.
BTW, playing another ME1 game. Some of the sidequests are really tedious. "Geth incursions." Sometimes I curse myself for being such a completionist, but the game doesn't feel done if I don't do everything.
#10149
Posté 22 août 2011 - 01:27
Ieldra2 wrote...
@Arijharn:
ME3 has a new lighting system? Where did you get that information?
Just by looking at the footage, stuff like blooming and how shadow's work now are more 'hi-definition' than prior, there's actually a good youtube video that tries to portray the differences from memory.
#10150
Posté 22 août 2011 - 01:28
BTW, playing another ME1 game. Some of the sidequests are really tedious. "Geth incursions." Sometimes I curse myself for being such a completionist, but the game doesn't feel done if I don't do everything.
Tell me about it. The main story of ME1 is really strong, but that's like six missions. Everything else is so dull and repetitive, with WAY too much time spent in the Maco. I'm bringing another character through myself, and I'm not really looking forward to the middle game.






Retour en haut





