Skullheart wrote...
wow. Did I miss a cat fight?
Rarrrrrr
Modifié par flemm, 15 septembre 2011 - 03:43 .
Skullheart wrote...
wow. Did I miss a cat fight?
Modifié par flemm, 15 septembre 2011 - 03:43 .
Rarrrrrr

flemm wrote...
The sky is green.
Also... Don't touch my Miranda!
Actually, Omega, serious question: where does this hypothetical actually come from?Omega4RelayResident wrote...
So yeah if in game Miri said something like "I cant see anyone ever getting attached to Mr. Brittle Bones over there." If she was'nt kidding around I would knock her teeth out and send her packing back to TIM if that was an option. Some things are just crossing the line.
I mean, sure, if Miranda or anyone else suddenly became like a serial killer or kitten-strangler or *insert whatever despicable thing*, I wouldn't like that either. But so what, really? She isn't going to start mocking Joker for his disability anymore than she is going to start strangling kittens on a regular basis.
So, I guess, if the point was to inform everyone that you don't like people who make fun of the disabled, well, mission accomplished. But Omega, I've got to tell you, I would have given you the benefit of the doubt on that one anyway. And I'm pretty sure everyone agrees that, no, Miranda making fun of the disabled would not be good. But I feel like, having established that universal truth of ultimate obviousness, we can move on
Modifié par Omega4RelayResident, 15 septembre 2011 - 04:54 .
Melrache wrote...
1-2 get the point across, overdoing is never funzies.
This reminds me of Miri the most. Simple, beautiful, but still kinda badass looking.





Modifié par Ieldra2, 15 septembre 2011 - 05:51 .
Melrache wrote...
Wrong, there can never be too many, only too few. These pics we've seen 1000000000 times already.
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
atoms of course.Skullheart wrote...
Pixels vs atoms. Can't decide yet...
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 15 septembre 2011 - 06:19 .
Dave of Canada wrote...
Strahovski is Miranda, Miranda is not Strahovski. This isn't a Strahovski appreciation thread.
Dave of Canada wrote...
Strahovski is Miranda, Miranda is not Strahovski. This isn't a Strahovski appreciation thread.
(Under the sig)raziel1980 wrote...
@ Ieldra2, where in the hell do you get the mod to remove that visor from Miri's AAP armor???
Modifié par Vertigo_1, 15 septembre 2011 - 06:45 .
Melrache wrote...
Stating the obvious doesn't make you look smart.
Vertigo_1 wrote...
(Under the sig)raziel1980 wrote...
@ Ieldra2, where in the hell do you get the mod to remove that visor from Miri's AAP armor???
|
|
V
Modifié par Spanky Magoo, 15 septembre 2011 - 06:55 .
<Omega4RelayResident wrote...
Melrache wrote...
Wrong, there can never be too many, only too few. These pics we've seen 1000000000 times already.
And all this time I thought Miri and Yvonne are the two different sides of the same coin....
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Obvious, Obvious, and ObviousDave of Canada wrote...
Strahovski is Miranda, Miranda is not Strahovski. This isn't a Strahovski appreciation thread.
Don't think I don't know - or appreciate - that. I wouldn't want a Miranda as ruthless as TIM. The problem is that using the technology of the base as such cannot be seen as morally reprehensible by any rational moral reasoning. Or do you really think that liquefying people is all the base is good for? Or that any researcher worth her name would assume that beforehand? The experiments on Pragia, Overlord, the Rachni studies - these are obviously problematic at least, the damage done to intelligent beings cannot be discounted and things remain ethically problematic even if you justify the experiments.flemm wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
So I find myself unable to reconcile this line with Miranda. I think it was put in to make Miranda acceptable for Paragons with complete disregard of her character consistency.
I understand your point of view, but I don't think I really agree. Or, I should say, I agree that we need more information and that Miranda's motivation needs to be further explored in ME3. But I don't agree that it's hard to reconcile this scene with Miranda as we know the character.
One of the things that makes Miranda interesting is that she is ruthless, but within certain bounds. This is in evidence throughout the game. Witness her insistence that the cell running experiments on Jack was "not really Cerberus." And her rationalisations of certain Cerberus activities in conversation with Shepard: We stopped experimenting on the Rachni as soon as we learned they were sentient. Another project was a "tragic mistake," etc.
I don't see this as an example for idealization and rationalization. Why? She has a point. It makes no sense for TIM to send Shepard into a trap after he spent several billion credits to bring him back from the dead. Not before he has done his task and - as far as TIM is concerned - acquired Reaper technology (in the form of the base, but he couldn't know the form it would take at that point) for him.So, she has a somewhat idealized vision of Cerberus, and that mix of pragmatism and idealism is characteristic of her: "I believe in what Cerberus stands for. I believe in our goals."
So, where does this tendency to idealize and rationalize come from? Well, probably from the fact that Cerberus was originally a refuge from her father. She was dependant on the organisation and needed/wanted to believe that this was her place in the world. On the Collector Ship there is obvious dismay in her voice at the thought that TIM might betray her. "There has to be another explanation."
The problem here is the blanket statement "Using anything from this base......." It does not apply to Cerberus in any way, it's a statement of moral absolutism with complete absence of the pragmatism that should also be there at this point. Up to that point, morality and expediency had a balance in Miranda, which may differ depending in your interpretation but neither part was absent. Neither pragmatism or morality ruled Miranda's character exclusively. That's gone with this statement, and more to the point, it's gone in a completely irrational way. With this statement, she goes from a reasonable limited pragmatism to being exactly the sentimental morally absolutist Paragon most of us here dislike.So, really the resignation scene is partly about Miranda leaving the cocoon of Cerberus and striking out on her own. Or finally admitting that her goals and those of TIM are not identical. "Betrayal" of herself or betrayal of her mission. Or betrayal of the people who would die in Cerberus' next botched experiment. Probably all of the above.
Then she should have said so. She should have said something that amounts to "I can't justify keeping it, knowing what you'll do with it" (Meaning TIM to whom she was speaking to at that point). What she says instead amounts to "This technology is evil". That's not Miranda speaking, sorry. TIM forces her to choose between Cerberus and Shepard, leading to her resignation. I find that a little problematic given her history but I can accept it as character development. But her reasoning is off the rails.I mean, she knows how it will be used and who will be using it. It's not an academic or theoretical question.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 15 septembre 2011 - 07:39 .
Modifié par Omega4RelayResident, 15 septembre 2011 - 07:38 .