What do you mean?MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...
What's the new convention called?
oh the convention?
Modifié par Eyeshield21, 16 septembre 2011 - 10:50 .
What do you mean?MASSEFFECTfanforlife101 wrote...
What's the new convention called?
Modifié par Eyeshield21, 16 septembre 2011 - 10:50 .
Modifié par MASSEFFECTfanforlife101, 16 septembre 2011 - 10:56 .
I have some hope things won't go that way. But yeah, that's my greatest fear as well.jtav wrote...
Briefly speaking, that the Miranda I saw on Lazarus Station is gone. I want the woman who's own hands are not clean and for whom the mission comes first. I've sen too many female characters who appear cold and ruthless but just need someone to show them the light and really want marriage and children and drop the cause the moment they meet our hero. Paranoid? Maybe. And yet, the idea nags at me.
jtav wrote...
Briefly speaking, that the Miranda I saw on Lazarus Station is gone. I want the woman who's own hands are not clean and for whom the mission comes first. I've sen too many female characters who appear cold and ruthless but just need someone to show them the light and really want marriage and children and drop the cause the moment they meet our hero. Paranoid? Maybe. And yet, the idea nags at me.
I don't expect it either, but they all need to have a truce or they'll end up dead.flemm wrote...
I'm not really concerned about her losing her committment to the mission or capacity to be ruthless (within certain bounds). What will change, I think mainly, will be the mission, i.e. she won't be aligned with Cerberus anymore, because she will no longer be deluding herself as to the nature of that organisation.
I don't expect her to be fully allied with the Alliance either, though. What I expect is a temporary and uneasy pact/truce in order to deal with Cerberus and the Reaper threat, at which point Miranda goes her own way. Something along those lines.
Eyeshield21 wrote...
I don't expect it either, but they all need to have a truce or they'll end up dead.
Modifié par flemm, 16 septembre 2011 - 11:29 .
jtav wrote...
I'd love to see Miranda transition to faction leader. The only thing I would miss is banter.
Modifié par flemm, 16 septembre 2011 - 11:46 .
flemm wrote...
I'd miss the banter and having her on the squad for the rest of the game. But if she's on the squad for a good chunk of the game and plays a prominent role on some of the Cerberus missions, then transitions to faction leader, I agree that could potentially be pretty damn cool.
Modifié par naledgeborn, 17 septembre 2011 - 12:04 .
naledgeborn wrote...
She has to be available for the 'final battle' though.
naledgeborn wrote...
They don't have to be mutually exclusive. Her father's empire would give her the resources she'd need to destroy and rebuild Cerberus without integrating (back?) into the Alliance's chain of command. That could be one of the choices in ME3.
Modifié par flemm, 17 septembre 2011 - 12:29 .
Not a fair comparision. Kelly has a delusioned view of Cerberus.Seboist wrote...
It's sad to see Kelly being more of a Cerberus loyalist than Miranda in ME2.
What makes you think Shepard didn't turn himself in?jtav wrote...
Shep is in chains in the SR-2 brig in the comic and they're on Omega. Looks as if s/he didn't turn themselves in after all. Could Miranda be in Alliance custody when the game starts?
Modifié par MisterJB, 17 septembre 2011 - 12:59 .
jtav wrote...
Could Miranda be in Alliance custody when the game starts?
jtav wrote...
It would make a certain amount of sense thematically. She would be mistrusted by the crew. And things have changed on the SR-2. What better way to highlight that than having the former XO back on the ship as a criminal there by sufferance?