Collider wrote...
He believed what he was doing was the right thing to do, and that Miranda kidnapped Oriana in the first place.
He did except a money bribe, but he's also poor. Needs money.
Miranda claims Niket knew what she went through in her infancy and he also knew that Oriana had been with her surrogate family for 19 years. Therefore, Niket places money above everything else, therefore he has screwed up morals and values.
Miranda justifies her decision to execute him on the basis that he is a loose end, rather than as punishment for trying to get Oriana back to her father.
Killing Niket to protect Oriana is, IMO, much more justifiable than killing him as a punishment.
Gallimatia wrote...
I can't see that happening. Given that it has no effect on the romance in ME2 it would be odd to make it a defining moment now. If there was a variable for that I'd think they would have used it somewhere in ME2 first and foremost.
You do get some different lines in ME2 depending on what you choose. It could be just that or they could expand this in ME3.
Or I could be completely mistaken. If I chance upon the source, I'll be sure to post it, ofc.
Also making people use the admire line to unlock material? Not cool.
What kind of reasoning is that?
"Making people kill the Council to unlock material? Not cool."
Different choices lead to different material, simple as that.
jtav wrote...
Not a universal indicator, no, but the players who keep the CB do seem to be the ones who extol her ruthless side.
Define "ruthless side". For example, I defend destroying the base just as strongly as I defend the control chip and the experiments in ME1. I would certainly be unhappy if I had a sentimental Miranda who puts emotions before reason in ME3 just because of one decision where I can't even influentiate the way she looks at it.
Ieldra2 wrote...
Regarding the CB decision, how about an opportunity to convince her you made the right decision if you kept it? I would absolutely appreciate an opportunity to engage in a little debate with Miranda.
Yeah, definitelly.