flemm wrote...
I don't think I quite follow. Wouldn't it be simpler, and more accurate, to say that Miranda does, in fact, determine the application/value of her enhancements, which is in turn what makes her wrong when she says that she can only take credit for her mistakes?
Let me ask you this: is it a foreseeable consequence what Miranda does with her gifts? If not, then Miranda's father cannot be judged by what Miranda does with the gifts he gave her. He can neither be blamed nor praised for the consequences. Miranda is free, and Miranda's enhancements are neutral.
On the other hand, If you say that the value of Miranda's fathers actions, i.e. giving her enhancements (not the others), is determined by what she does with them, then you presume his responsibility for what Miranda does, for only if you can be said to have such responsibility can the action fall back on you.
But for anything morally neutral with regard to the consequences for others, it is usually counted as more desirable to give people what they want rather than deny them, for if it isn't bad, there is no reason to deny them. And who wouldn't want to be smarter and live longer? Thus, Miranda's enhancements are primarily a good thing.
Uh...this has gotten complicated.... There's likely a simpler way to express this.
Edit:
As for biotics, the telekinetic abilities can be used in many useful non-damaging ways. Depending on their exact nature, that may also apply to other biotic abilities. That they are primarily used as a weapon is a result of the prejudice against biotics, driving them out of the human cultural mainstream. Biotic abilities as as neutral as any tool.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 03 octobre 2011 - 10:24 .