Yes, I get it. Not every lesbian or gay will openly broadcast their sexual preference or stereotypically act a certain way. But that is real life, not a video game.
Modifié par naledgeborn, 24 juin 2011 - 04:07 .
Modifié par naledgeborn, 24 juin 2011 - 04:07 .
naledgeborn wrote...
If Miranda were a lesbian or bisexual she should have been in Mass Effect 2. At the very least it could have been openly stated or subtly implied like Jack. It wasn't therefore making it so in Mass Effect 3 is a retcon.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 24 juin 2011 - 04:40 .
Guest_Nyoka_*
So you think in video games all characters should openly broadcast their sexual preference or stereotypically act a certain way.naledgeborn wrote...
Not every lesbian or gay will openly broadcast their sexual preference or stereotypically act a certain way. But that is real life, not a video game.
Ieldra2 wrote...
A bi Miranda is a retcon. From tvtropes.org:
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 24 juin 2011 - 04:46 .
Ieldra2 wrote...
The problem with a retcon is that the absence of an f/f romance in ME2 has established Miranda as straight in most players' minds, which results in a cognitive dissonance in ME3 should she become bi.
Ieldra2 wrote...
Personally, I also fear that bi Miranda will result in more generic romance dialogue.
Ieldra2 wrote...
A bi Miranda is a retcon. From tvtropes.org:
"Retcon = Retroactive Continuity.
Reframing past events to serve a current plot need. When the inserted events work with what was previously stated, it's a Revision; when they outright replace it, it's a Rewrite. The ideal retcon clarifies a question alluded to without adding excessive new questions. In its most basic form, this is any plot point that was not intended from the beginning. The most preferred use is where it contradicts nothing, even though it was changed later on."
The problem with a retcon is that the absence of an f/f romance in ME2 has established Miranda as straight in most players' minds, which results in a cognitive dissonance in ME3 should she become bi.
Personally, I also fear that bi Miranda will result in more generic romance dialogue. That's the main reason I'm against it.
Modifié par The Uncanny, 24 juin 2011 - 04:54 .
Guest_Nyoka_*
Reframing past events.Ieldra2 wrote...
Reframing past events to serve a current plot need. When the inserted events work with what was previously stated, it's a Revision; when they outright replace it, it's a Rewrite. The ideal retcon clarifies a question alluded to without adding excessive new questions. In its most basic form, this is any plot point that was not intended from the beginning. The most preferred use is where it contradicts nothing, even though it was changed later on."[/i]
First, you are not the spokesman of most players. You speak only for yourself.The problem with a retcon is that the absence of an f/f romance in ME2 has established Miranda as straight in most players' minds
That's an implementation thing unrelated to Miranda's character. You want a good romance, I want a good romance. We want the same thing.Personally, I also fear that bi Miranda will result in more generic romance dialogue.
Modifié par Nyoka, 24 juin 2011 - 05:03 .
They tried that in DA2. They made it so that you could roleplay almost any romance (exception: Anders) as if the character were straight or lesbian/gay without any contradictions. In principle a very good idea. But unfortunately, my perception of the character is not only shaped by my own playing experience, but also by that of others I communicate with. If I know a character is bi from another source, then I cannot roleplay as if she weren't any more.The Uncanny wrote...
But here is my point: why? How is it cognitive dissonance unless she sits down in front of MaleShep and says "Oh by the way, I sleep with women too. That isn't a problem for you is it?"
Additional lines, maybe, but not differing visuals. I don't think we'd have gotten the kiss scene in the romance were Miranda bi, and that's one of my favorites. In DA2, I found that Isabela's f/f romance was not convincing, it felt like a patch of the straight romance. I agree that it could theoretically be handled well, but I doubt that it will be.Also I don't see it making her romance more generic. Any s/s romance has always been implemented with a few additional lines of variant dialogue. The writer's focus is, and should be, on the character and the emotions.
A retcon does not require a contradiction. It is a reinterpretation. As the text says, in its simplest form, a retcon is any plot point that was not intended from the beginning.Nyoka wrote...
Reframing past events.
You need Miranda rejecting a same sex relationship, so we can reframe that rejection into acceptance. Didn't happen. You don't have any past event to reframe.
It is a plausible suppostion. I challenge you to disprove it or replace it with an equally plausible one.First, you are not the spokesman of most players. You speak only for yourself.
It is not as simple as that. See my previous post for the explanation.Second, if she's straight in your game, that's fantastic. Don't romance her with femshep. Romance her with Manshep. Simple as that.
If her character being bi is likely to result in a lesser implementation of the romance, then I have grounds to prefer the s/s options not to be present.
That's an implementation thing unrelated to Miranda's character. You want a good romance, I want a good romance. We want the same thing.Personally, I also fear that bi Miranda will result in more generic romance dialogue.
Ieldra2 wrote...
But unfortunately, my perception of the character is not only shaped by my own playing experience, but also by that of others I communicate with. If I know a character is bi from another source, then I cannot roleplay as if she weren't any more.
Would you please stop putting words into my mouth and opinions into my brain. Miranda remains my favorite character and I will continue to romance her regardless of what they do to her sexual orientation. Nonetheless, I have a very strong preference for a non-bi Miranda. Is that so hard to understand?The Uncanny wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
But unfortunately, my perception of the character is not only shaped by my own playing experience, but also by that of others I communicate with. If I know a character is bi from another source, then I cannot roleplay as if she weren't any more.
So what it ultimately comes down is 'if Miranda is an f/f option I'll lose interest in her because she's an f/f option'.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 24 juin 2011 - 05:18 .
Ieldra2 wrote...
Would you please stop putting words into my mouth and opinions into my brain.
Ieldra2 wrote...
Miranda remains my favorite character and I will continue to romance her. Nonetheless, I have a very strong preference for a non-bi Miranda. Is that so hard to understand?
Modifié par Ieldra2, 24 juin 2011 - 05:24 .
Master Shiori wrote...
*snip* Considering the distinct lack of information about her sexual preference or history, other than a brief relationship with Jacob which Miri doesn't even bring up at any time, *snip*
Guest_Nyoka_*
As the text says, a retcon is "reframing past events to serve a current plot need". And there are no past events to reframe in this case.Ieldra2 wrote...
A retcon does not require a contradiction. It is a reinterpretation. As the text says, in its simplest form, a retcon is any plot point that was not intended from the beginning.
Sorry, I only accept arguments.It is a plausible suppostion.
Yes, it really is as simple as that. The identity thing is irrelevant in your game, since in your game, she is straight. No identity crisis. I thought you said in your mind she is established as straight. That's okay. You don't need to change your mind on that. She will continue to be straight for you.It is not as simple as that. See my previous post for the explanation.
Good thing then that her character being bi is not likely to result in a lesser implementation of the romance, as proven by the most developed NPC in the Mass Effect series, who incidentally happens to have also the most developed romance related dialogue, including even lines regarding Shep's other romances.If her character being bi is likely to result in a lesser implementation of the romance, then I have grounds to prefer the s/s options not to be present.