feliciano2040 wrote...
Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm sensing some of you guys let Niket take a mass accelerator round to the gut!
I didn't, but I hate that interrupt. Shepard's line makes him sound like a monumental vagina.
feliciano2040 wrote...
Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm sensing some of you guys let Niket take a mass accelerator round to the gut!
Modifié par naledgeborn, 08 décembre 2011 - 04:23 .
Modifié par jtav, 08 décembre 2011 - 04:23 .
Modifié par CrutchCricket, 08 décembre 2011 - 04:23 .
CrutchCricket wrote...
Miranda: Then you're the only loose end. (raises gun)
(Shepard shoots Niket in the head)
Miranda: Why?
Shepard: You're too close on this one. It would've hurt you.
Modifié par naledgeborn, 08 décembre 2011 - 04:25 .
Modifié par enayasoul, 08 décembre 2011 - 04:31 .
jtav wrote...
But yes, I let her take the shot. He deserves it, and Miranda's a big girl.
CrutchCricket wrote...
I never claimed it was wrong for either of them. I just don't want her to do it impulsively based on her anger. Hence why I gave the contrasting Garrus example. If she had been cool and methodical about it like he had, I'd have no problem. My Shepard lets Garrus take the shot every single time. If someone's betrayed you with the consequence that people you care about die/are in mortal peril, they die. Morality has nothing to do with it.
Modifié par feliciano2040, 08 décembre 2011 - 04:39 .
jtav wrote...
Crutch, that would be terribly insulting. Too much of "taking on her sin so she doesn't have to." If it's wrong for Miranda to kill, it's also wrong for Shep.
Modifié par naledgeborn, 08 décembre 2011 - 04:32 .
True. An additional conversation after the mission where she and Shepard have to work this out would also have been acceptable.naledgeborn wrote...
I think Miranda would intially be pissed off at Shepard. But she'd get over it and understand why he did it (for her).
Perhaps you've forgotten the trigger-happy asari merc with a shotgun standing beside him. Not only is he responsible for her being there (thus commited to something dangerous), but said trigger happy merc will prevent his detainment (and I don't just mean she shoots him if Miranda doesn't). Yes the killing will be motivated by vengeance but I'm fine with that. Besides the alternative is indeed him dying for nothing but trigger-happiness. This has no effect on Miranda's motivations but it is worse nonetheless.Xilizhra wrote...
NIket is unarmed, easily detained, and not even really committed to doing anything dangerous. There's no reason for him to die other than vengeance, and I consider that utterly invalid.
Xilizhra wrote...
NIket is unarmed, easily detained, and not even really committed to doing anything dangerous. There's no reason for him to die other than vengeance, and I consider that utterly invalid.
Xilizhra wrote...
NIket is unarmed, easily detained, and not even really committed to doing anything dangerous. There's no reason for him to die other than vengeance, and I consider that utterly invalid.
Xilizhra wrote...
NIket is unarmed, easily detained, and not even really committed to doing anything dangerous. There's no reason for him to die other than vengeance, and I consider that utterly invalid.
jtav wrote...
He betrayed his oldest friend and is assisting in the kidnapping of adult so she can be returned to a father we know abused one daughter and killed/disposed of others. For money. Oh, yes, he deserves it. I only regret I can't make it slow and painful. Him and Mr. Lawson. I want them to suffer.
medicine wrote...
Niket knows too much. You can't trust him, since it didn't actually work last time. He might've another "change of heart" in credits, and there's too much at stake.
Modifié par feliciano2040, 08 décembre 2011 - 04:56 .
It certainly doesn't matter to Niket, and I believe Miranda's not killing him will be better in the long run. Besides, we don't know that Enyala would just shoot him.Perhaps you've forgotten the trigger-happy asari merc with a shotgun standing beside him. Not only is he responsible for her being there (thus commited to something dangerous), but said trigger happy merc will prevent his detainment (and I don't just mean she shoots him if Miranda doesn't). Yes the killing will be motivated by vengeance but I'm fine with that. Besides the alternative is indeed him dying for nothing but trigger-happiness. This has no effect on Miranda's motivations but it is worse nonetheless.
Also, because he thinks that Miranda is at fault for kidnapping Oriana to begin with; it doesn't sound like Niket was privy to a lot of the "abuse" information, as it was never brought up in their conversation. In any case, no one "deserves" to die.He betrayed his oldest friend and is assisting in the kidnapping of adult so she can be returned to a father we know abused one daughter and killed/disposed of others. For money. Oh, yes, he deserves it. I only regret I can't make it slow and painful. Him and Mr. Lawson. I want them to suffer.
Hm, Wrex on Virmire? Not to mention probable incidents occurring in ME3. But it doesn't matter because it's Shepard's call right now, not Miranda's, and Shepard doesn't have your supposed betrayal fog.Funny thing about how betrayal works; you really don't stop and think about... anything. You just pick a target and start firing. Doubt anyone would act drastically different from Miranda were they in her shoes. In fact a lot of people wouldn't even bother with "Why?", they'd just start firing.
Not if he doesn't know Oriana's new location.Oh yes, it is.
Niket knows too much. You can't trust him, since it didn't actually work last time. He might've another "change of heart" in credits, and there's too much at stake.
Xilizhra wrote...
Hm, Wrex on Virmire? Not to mention probable incidents occurring in ME3. But it doesn't matter because it's Shepard's call right now, not Miranda's, and Shepard doesn't have your supposed betrayal fog.
jtav wrote...
Miranda's kidnapping of Oriana is the exact same situation as the battered wife who takes the kids so the husband can't get to them. Also, Oriana is an adult. Her father would no longer have custody anyway.
Xilizhra wrote...
NIket is unarmed, easily detained, and not even really committed to doing anything dangerous. There's no reason for him to die other than vengeance, and I consider that utterly invalid.
Modifié par CastonFolarus, 08 décembre 2011 - 05:14 .