Nrieh wrote...
I wonder. Is it just me or anyone else is also gets crazy when people treat KaidanAsh as ONE character (VS)?..
There is an ongoing thread about why would Undina promote himher to spectre. I don't understand how can there be some univresal motivation about it, and even less I understand how people really make no difference between them. I know BW screwed both, and they share same damn scenes (horizoncoup) which prevents Kaidan from using his biotics in both cases...I feel there is something wrong about this. Could tolerate it for ME2 (as not much difference for 1 cut and a pic on the table), but in ME3 they ARE hell different. And Kaidan does not get drunk aboard, lol. I don't like how they treated Ash in ME3, but that's not the matter. They are different, anyway, no matter if I like her or not. Thoughts?
I think part of the reason that they are so drastically different in ME3 was becuase of complaints in ME2 that they were essentially the same character, and that which one you chose to save was irrelevant unless you romanced one of them.
As far as the promotion thing goes--I've kind of subconciously headcannoned that Udina made the request because he/she was one of Shepard's former crew so it was more a political move or for show or something. This will probably get me virtually blundgeoned, but I never really saw Kaidan or Ashley as Spectre material. But then again, when Shepard was made a Spectre, I kind of thought the same thing about him/her in retrospect. Especially when you think about other Spectre NPCs like Nihlus, Saren (especially in the books), and Vasir who are all totally badass. They all make Shepard look like kind of a crappy Spectre.
Edit: He sure is cute though
Modifié par txmn1016, 11 juin 2012 - 04:53 .