ADLegend21 wrote...
I haven't seen anything in ME3 to indicate that ashley took the persuasion to heart, however, but I can headcanon right?[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie]
Well I guess I'm kindof asking what your headcannon is, then.
krukow wrote...
Well, the xenophobic stuff was gone anyways by ME3 (as were other aspects of her personality). However, I
don't know how problematic it would have been. It would have required more conversation possibilities, which would have resulted in more... autodialogue. So in a perfect world it would be cool, I don't think implimenting it in ME3 would have made the game better.
I don't think it would have necessarily resulted in more autodialogue, but maybe it could just change how the VS reacts to what Shepard says? I dunno. You're right, though, ultimately, it wouldn't change the game and you'll still have the same rainbow colored endings.
DWH1982 wrote...
Persuading her in ME1 seems more like making her consider a viewpoint she really hadn't considered before. For the most part, it doesn't result in a major change in her personality. Can't really say what happens with Kaidan, since I've never done that.
One big thing does change that I don't like: She argues in favor of saving the Council. It just doesn't feel "right" to have her arguing that point, if only because I think she'd view preserving the fleet as the more practical option.
Sorry, bad choice of words I guess - the VS is still the same person, just looks at the galaxy a little
differently.
Anyway, Kaidan does the same thing - arguing to let the council die, instead of his default save the council speech, which feels like a pretty serious contrast. There aren't any other major consequences, but "renegade"Kaidan does have some funny lines.
Thanks for entertaining my thought experiment. Just wanted a different set of opinions from fellow VS fans.
Edit: Ugh, formatting fail.
Modifié par leborum, 07 août 2012 - 01:51 .