50128 réponses à ce sujet

[ratzerman]

TobiTobsen wrote...

Badpie wrote...

I can't tell if the article indicates that "let her/him go" is directed AT Ash or Kaidan or ABOUT them.  Seems like from the way it's written Shepard is talking TO them.

I understood it the same way. As if Kaidan and Ashley are holding someone hostage and Shep is directing his "Let him/her go" AT A/K.

It's gotta be ABOUT them, right? That's why she recorded male and female versions of the line. It Ash was the one holding someone hostage, the hostage would either be a him or a her. Not both.

[xxSgt_Reed_24xx]

ratzerman wrote...

xxSgt_Reed_24xx wrote...

One problem....

I already killed Balak! 

Hmmmm..... OK, replace Balak with a crazy, indoctrinated TIM.

No... not timmeh!!!

[Badpie]

xxSgt_Reed_24xx wrote...

ratzerman wrote...

xxSgt_Reed_24xx wrote...

One problem....

I already killed Balak! 

Hmmmm..... OK, replace Balak with a crazy, indoctrinated TIM.

No... not timmeh!!!

It'll come right from this scene:

TIM:  Hey Williams, your grandpa totally founded Cerberus lol u mad bro?
Ash: FFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUU- *holds gun to his head*
TIM:  Stop I have major excite secret for win whole war gasp! Kill me you no get!
Ash: .....FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Shep:  Let him go!
TIM:  LOL I'm totally a chick! *takes off mask*
Shep:  Let her go!
Ash:  *shoots*
Shep: NO!
CRITICAL MISSION FAILURE

[xxSgt_Reed_24xx]

Badpie wrote...

xxSgt_Reed_24xx wrote...

ratzerman wrote...

xxSgt_Reed_24xx wrote...

One problem....

I already killed Balak! 

Hmmmm..... OK, replace Balak with a crazy, indoctrinated TIM.

No... not timmeh!!!

It'll come right from this scene:

TIM:  Hey Williams, your grandpa totally founded Cerberus lol u mad bro?
Ash: FFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUU- *holds gun to his head*
TIM:  Stop I have major excite secret for win whole war gasp! Kill me you no get!
Ash: .....FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Shep:  Let him go!
TIM:  LOL I'm totally a chick! *takes off mask*
Shep:  Let her go!
Ash:  *shoots*
Shep: NO!
CRITICAL MISSION FAILURE

LMFAO!!! :lol::lol:

I would buy this.

DLC NAO!

[Pups_of_war_76]

ratzerman wrote...

Here's the quote from the New York article...

"Shepard, however, is forced to save one character and sacrifice the other, and, in Mass Effect 2, whichever of the two was saved reappears to remonstrate with him or her. The result of the conversation, which can play out in various ways, determines how the character of A/K will interact with Shepard in Mass Effect 3."

"The new scene involves a tense exchange between Shepard and A/K. The first line of the scene was simple enough: 'Let her/him go.' But Hale had to say it multiple times, with different emphases, in order to communicate every possible state of alarm with which Shepard would react to A/K. Hale did her customary four takes of "Let her go," which she followed with four takes of "Let him go." Two were growly, hateful takes, and two were hard, urgent takes. As she finished, Hale flexed as if to indicate a deepening transformation into Shepard. She was then told that her lines had to be recorded as though she were running.

Hale's next line was 'No!' Livingstone turned to Walters and asked, 'Is this a panicked 'No' or an angry 'No?''
'It's a' - Walters hesitated - 'futile 'No.''
Hale nodded. 'No!' she said, stirringly, a moment later.
'More compassion,' Livingstone said. 'Less heightened.'
Hale tried again, and her 'No!' seemed to emerge from some alarmed, half-strangled place in her throat."

:-(

[jlb524]

ratzerman wrote...

It's gotta be ABOUT them, right? That's why she recorded male and female versions of the line. It Ash was the one holding someone hostage, the hostage would either be a him or a her. Not both.

Yes.

Unless the hostage is your ME2 LI.  *I kid*

[Badpie]

Pups_of_war_76 wrote...

ratzerman wrote...

Here's the quote from the New York article...

"Shepard, however, is forced to save one character and sacrifice the other, and, in Mass Effect 2, whichever of the two was saved reappears to remonstrate with him or her. The result of the conversation, which can play out in various ways, determines how the character of A/K will interact with Shepard in Mass Effect 3."

"The new scene involves a tense exchange between Shepard and A/K. The first line of the scene was simple enough: 'Let her/him go.' But Hale had to say it multiple times, with different emphases, in order to communicate every possible state of alarm with which Shepard would react to A/K. Hale did her customary four takes of "Let her go," which she followed with four takes of "Let him go." Two were growly, hateful takes, and two were hard, urgent takes. As she finished, Hale flexed as if to indicate a deepening transformation into Shepard. She was then told that her lines had to be recorded as though she were running.

Hale's next line was 'No!' Livingstone turned to Walters and asked, 'Is this a panicked 'No' or an angry 'No?''
'It's a' - Walters hesitated - 'futile 'No.''
Hale nodded. 'No!' she said, stirringly, a moment later.
'More compassion,' Livingstone said. 'Less heightened.'
Hale tried again, and her 'No!' seemed to emerge from some alarmed, half-strangled place in her throat."

:-(

I feel a dejected spaghetti western coming on, Pups....

[Pups_of_war_76]

Badpie wrote...

Pups_of_war_76 wrote...

ratzerman wrote...

Here's the quote from the New York article...

"Shepard, however, is forced to save one character and sacrifice the other, and, in Mass Effect 2, whichever of the two was saved reappears to remonstrate with him or her. The result of the conversation, which can play out in various ways, determines how the character of A/K will interact with Shepard in Mass Effect 3."

"The new scene involves a tense exchange between Shepard and A/K. The first line of the scene was simple enough: 'Let her/him go.' But Hale had to say it multiple times, with different emphases, in order to communicate every possible state of alarm with which Shepard would react to A/K. Hale did her customary four takes of "Let her go," which she followed with four takes of "Let him go." Two were growly, hateful takes, and two were hard, urgent takes. As she finished, Hale flexed as if to indicate a deepening transformation into Shepard. She was then told that her lines had to be recorded as though she were running.

Hale's next line was 'No!' Livingstone turned to Walters and asked, 'Is this a panicked 'No' or an angry 'No?''
'It's a' - Walters hesitated - 'futile 'No.''
Hale nodded. 'No!' she said, stirringly, a moment later.
'More compassion,' Livingstone said. 'Less heightened.'
Hale tried again, and her 'No!' seemed to emerge from some alarmed, half-strangled place in her throat."

:-(

I feel a dejected spaghetti western coming on, Pups....

Not so fast! 

We did react with similar leeriness to grimdark!Liara, and that ended up turning out alright (so far).

We shouldn't resort to spaghetti westerns until a dorky Casey Hudson interview a couple of months before release hints that Ash and Kaidan have both turned into Evil Communist Space Templars and croons about how much cooler and deeper the change makes them as characters. 

[Badpie]

I mean they've already hinted at former friends becoming enemies and big show downs possibly with members of your squad. Then there's the whole easily used indoctrination excuse for anything. I sincerely doubt they're making any of these possibilities for squadmates who could be dead, therefore the entirety of the ME2 squad is out of the picture.

And if you think they're making their pet Liara betray Shepard or otherwise muck everything up you're crazy.  GUESS WHO THAT LEAVES.

Modifié par Badpie, 21 août 2011 - 08:30 .

[xxSgt_Reed_24xx]

Badpie wrote...

I mean they've already hinted at former friends becoming enemies and big show downs possibly with members of your squad. Then there's the whole easily used indoctrination excuse for anything. I sincerely doubt they're making any of these possibilities for squadmates who could be dead, therefore the entirety of the ME2 squad is out of the picture.

And if you think they're making their pet Liara betray Shepard or otherwise muck everything up you're crazy.  GUESS WHO THAT LEAVES.

Baaaaad Badpie!

You're not supposed to be a pessimist! lolz

[Badpie]

xxSgt_Reed_24xx wrote...

Badpie wrote...

I mean they've already hinted at former friends becoming enemies and big show downs possibly with members of your squad. Then there's the whole easily used indoctrination excuse for anything. I sincerely doubt they're making any of these possibilities for squadmates who could be dead, therefore the entirety of the ME2 squad is out of the picture.

And if you think they're making their pet Liara betray Shepard or otherwise muck everything up you're crazy.  GUESS WHO THAT LEAVES.

Baaaaad Badpie!

You're not supposed to be a pessimist! lolz

Realist. 

[ADLegend21]

Wow I wake up to find out Ashley and Kaidan can be in a hostage situation? I has a sad now......

[Badpie]

I mean it's all wild speculation.

[StrawberryDemon]

Hey I'm new so naturally the first thing I did was find the Ash forum

And I read the article in question, and I have my own little theory it says she says each line "two times" wheter it was simply because Hale couldn't do it the first time, OR because the other one's would be used for the Charm/Intimidate options and the "No" is if you use one of the non-persusive options. I'm probably miles out, no harm in speculation right?

[xxSgt_Reed_24xx]

Welcome to the Ash thread Strawberry! XD

Nice to have a new member.

[StrawberryDemon]

Thanks just looking forward to all the Ash goodness XD

[Mr. Brainheart]

Well you did want some news to talk about reed, Lol.

I was shocked at first, but I'm not getting crazy over it...It would be plain cruel to first makes us choose between Ash and Kaidan only to kill the other one aswell. This could also be an outcome of the game when you weren't quick enough essembling an army against the reapers, like a punishment.

Pehaps someone could tweet casey or someone? It's worth a shot.

Hi Strawberry!

Modifié par Mr. Brainheart, 21 août 2011 - 09:15 .

[xxSgt_Reed_24xx]

Mr. Brainheart wrote...

Well you did want some news to talk about reed, Lol.

Not this kind!!!

I don't remember saying, "man I wish they would release some info that sounds completely terrible in relation to Ash and that makes me think about horrible outcomes!" !!! lol

I swear... they better not kill her off or have her betray and leave Shepard. I'll cry. 

[StrawberryDemon]

True it would make the decision in ME1 quite pointless, but like you said perhaps it's a punishment for doing (Or not doing) something? Quite the mystery...

[Mr. Brainheart]

Remembering that they said that some sacrifices would be inevitable in a Q&A doesn't make me feel any better...(Alright I said I wouldn't go crazy over it, I was lying).

But yeah I'm guessing every squad member can die...so that would include the VS, if it is just as hard to get squaddies killed as in ME2 than I wouldn't worry.

[Badpie]

Hehe. I just tweeted this. Couldn't hurt.

@CaseyDHudson @macwalterslives On behalf of Ash/Kaidan fans everywhere I humbly request no unavoidable deaths or betrayals by them. They've had it rough enough already. Thanks.

[StrawberryDemon]

Oh I hate waiting for the games, I just get so...nervous? I know they said sacrifices, but Ash would be the BIGGEST sacrifice ever. (Personal opinion, and of course my Shepard's)

Same, if it's like ME2 then we've got nothing to worry about, but they could introduce a "Choice" system between squaddies and such.

[xxSgt_Reed_24xx]

StrawberryDemon wrote...

Oh I hate waiting for the games, I just get so...nervous? I know they said sacrifices, but Ash would be the BIGGEST sacrifice ever. (Personal opinion, and of course my Shepard's)

Same, if it's like ME2 then we've got nothing to worry about, but they could introduce a "Choice" system between squaddies and such.

I'd be fine with that... as that guarantees Ash to never die in any of my playthroughs rather than having a "she always gets captured/dies scenario"

Seriously, if that happened. I'd only play the game the once. I wouldn't wanna ever go through that kind of crap again.