It's ingame reality, Roleplaying in the universe the characters are either straight, gay or bisexual. This should be left to peoples imagination, so in my game Ashley can be bisexual, whilst in someone elses game she can be straight, for example. I don't understand how, or in what manner, we throw reality out of the window ingame. And again personally if Ash isn't bisexual or gay then no harm done, but we shouldn't exclude it beforehand and not treat it as a possibility.Future Guy wrote...
Well, I was really trying to make a point. The supporters for s/s romance in the game, will argue about a character's sexuality based on reality, (in this case, Ash) and argue that nothing can preclude this character from actually being bisexual in ME3, based on reality.
Then after arguing for the validity of various characters' possible bisexuality, and the game is then released, like DA2 for example, with all of the romanceable LIs as bisexual, they then throw reality out of the window, and say "it's just a game, this isn't reality".
Which only shows me that they could care less about the character, and all they care about is getting what they want, with their arguments only being self serving to begin with.
And since I would like an S/S romance, my arguments would be somewhat self serving, but I don't want others to feel insulted by it, so it's a choice if you choose not to, then it doesn't happen in your universe.
and anti-S/S arguments are also based of reality, only in a different way, for example we look at percentages and if we then see that the chance that someone is gay or straight and then conclude that it should be the same ingame, it's the same problem, since both everyone S/S and otherwise can be realistic, neither is absolute.
ToP Ash:
Modifié par Mr. Brainheart, 09 septembre 2011 - 09:58 .





Retour en haut






